similar to: alpha5: (message_body_search_ctx) assert

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "alpha5: (message_body_search_ctx) assert"

2005 Dec 19
0
alpha5: assert and core
My setup: Solaris 9, dovecot built with gcc 4.0.2. Mailboxes on remote NFS file mount from another S9 box (mbox format), index files local disk. IMAP usage only. Dovecot build like so: VERSION=1.0.alpha5 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include \ LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot.$VERSION --with-ssl=openssl \ --with-ssldir=/opt/openssl/ssl
2005 Sep 19
0
1.0alpha2: two asserts/cores
Hi, Two cores over the weekend, same assert message in syslog: imap(user): file message-body-search.c: line 393 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset <= part->physical_pos) Setup: Solaris 9, imap usage only, mbox format, dovecot compiled with gcc 4.0.1. gdb sessions of the two core files attached. Let me know if you need further analysis of the cores.
2005 Sep 07
0
1.0alpha1: new assert/core
Hi, I saw a new assert and core dump today in 1.0alpha1. Setup is Solaris 9, dovecot built with gcc 4.0.1, running as imap server for mbox format. The syslog said: IMAP(user): file message-body-search.c: line 393 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset <= part->physical_pos) A gdb analysis of the core dump is attached. BTW, I save core dumps in case you need
2005 Oct 18
1
1.0alpha3: assert and core
Hi, An assert and core with 1.0alpha3 on Solaris 9, mbox format, imap only, compiled with gcc 4.0.1. The syslog message was: imap(user): file message-body-search.c: line 393 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset <= part->physical_pos) gdb core dump analysis is attached. Jeff Earickson Colby College -------------- next part -------------- Script started on
2006 Sep 20
1
dovecot rc7 assert, core
Hi, Wow, I haven't had an assert/core in dovecot in a long time. Here goes: Setup: Solaris 10, dovecot built with gcc 4.1.1, imap and imaps only. User's home directory lives on a ZFS filesystem, but I don't think that makes a difference. So does every other user here (>3K). Assert: IMAP(mulepri): file message-body-search.c: line 393 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed:
2004 Dec 20
1
panic with search
Hello, My imap daemon get SIGABRT with following message. "pool_data_stack_realloc(): stack frame changed" This is caused with cvs head sources.(and or not with my last 2 patches.) This causes while doing search command. This is IMAP command log: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SORT THREAD=REFERENCES
2020 Sep 21
1
AW: doveadm search segfault Dovecot 2.2.22
Hey, i am now a bit deeper into dovecot debugging with gdb and have a full bt now, with debugging infos. Is there a patch that resolve this Problem in dovecot 2.2.22-1ubuntu2.13 for ubuntu 16? Here the bt: (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007ffff73cf3f3 in array_count_i (array=0x555555810d38) at ../../src/lib/array.h:155 No locals. #1 message_part_finish (ctx=ctx at entry=0x555555810ce0)
2007 Jan 11
0
mbox-rewrite errors
I've noticed a burst of about 12000 of these mbox-rewrite msgs in the log, spread over about 10 minutes. They are always for the same person (XXX'd out here), and have not occurred before or since. There's no evidence of device problems in the message log. Jan 10 17:46:43 ls1 imap-login: Login: XXX [::ffff:10.2.0.1] Jan 10 17:46:43 ls1 imap(XXX): file mbox-rewrite.c: line 429
2009 Sep 01
3
assertion failed while using sieve
Hi, there is a line in TODO: "- sieve-cmu.c crash: i_assert(buf->used - 1 == part->body_size.physical_size); ". Yes, we've really seen this crash. Therefore we upgraded to dovecot-1.2.3 with dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.11 in order to use sieve plugin (i.e. not cmu-sieve). We use Solaris 10 on Sun servers, we don't use NFS. However, unfortunately, dovecot with sieve crashes
2005 Aug 22
0
Segfault in imap
Found a new segfault in imap. The first log entry always happens on my mailbox, but doesn't seem to affect anything. This is CVS version from Aug. 15. dovecot: Aug 21 17:16:56 Error: 28017 IMAP(todd): Corrupted index cache file /mailhome/new/t/b/todd/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: Duplicated field in header: hdr.RESENT-TO dovecot: Aug 21 17:19:44 Error: child 28017 (imap) killed with
2003 Oct 05
2
those assertions
Hi, I did a bit of digging into the assertions from mbox-rewrite.c (hdr_parsed_size.physical_size == hdr_size). Every time it happens, hdr_size is 0, while hdr_parsed_size.physical_size is non-zero (presumably the correct value). Does this help track it down? I can't manage to get hold of an mbox that causes this though. Another infrequent assertion that's popped up: file
2006 Jun 26
1
Squirrel mail search tool fails
When I do a search in squirrelmail, it will start giving several results, but then fails. I use squirrelmail via https. maillog reveils: file message-body-search.c: line 391 (message_body_search_ctx): assertion failed: (input->v_offset <= part->physical_pos) Squirrel mail browser interface reveils: ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: SEARCH CHARSET UTF-8 ALL TEXT {4}
2003 Dec 17
2
Assert in Fedora dovecot-0.99.10.4-1
Hello, I'm seeing this in my dovecot log file: imap(blair): Dec 16 13:53:06 Panic: file istream.c: line 93 (i_stream_set_read_limit): assertion failed: (stream->v_size == 0 || v_offset <= stream->v_size) I get this consistently when I search for the string "unknown C primitive" across 10 mailboxes using the Windows Netscape 4.80 client. If there's any more
2009 Mar 12
0
Sieve - Backtrace after deliver(brabax): Panic: file sieve-cmu.c: line 264 (part_save): assertion failed: (buf->used - 1 == part->body_size.physical_size)
Hello, It's my first mailserver I set up. Thanks to everybody who contributes to dovecot. Dovecot works great for me! One thing I want to get rid off is this traceback error using dovecot with sieve. Somebody can help on this? System: Ubuntu server 8.10 dovecot --version 1.1.4 I filter for keywords in mail body with sieve. Mail is stored at lokal harddrive. I already deleted
2005 Jun 04
0
Crash and Assertion Error
I've attached two backtraces, one from a segfault and another from an assertion error in imap. I've seen a couple of the same assertion and this is the only segfault. It looks like they could be related. They both have to do with indexing anyway... The code is from CVS as of May 30. The segfault happened while imap was doing searches for my pine filters. I've also noticed that in
2006 Jan 31
1
beta2: strange assert
Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, mailboxes NFS mounted from another S9 system, imap. I got the following assert yesterday: Jan 30 19:57:15 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line 258 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL) Jan 30 19:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line
2008 Aug 29
1
Dovecot-1.1.2 assertion failure in preparsed_parse_next_header_init
Panic: IMAP(user): file message-parser.c: line 684 (preparsed_parse_next_header_init): assertion failed: (ctx->part- >physical_pos >= ctx->input->v_offset) Linux 2.6.24-19-386 Maildir on ext3 Looks similar to but different from http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-June/031523.html . #0 0xb7faf410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e6f085 in raise () from
2009 Oct 13
2
Panic: file sieve-cmu.c: line 262 (part_save): assertion failed: (buf->used - 1 == part->body_size.physical_size)
Hi everybody We are running in the same issue as Maciej Polewczynski does in http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-September/033645.html Is there already a solution? I dont think so? In the TODO-File for 1.2.2 this issue is still reported: #### [...] - sieve-cmu.c crash: i_assert(buf->used - 1 == part->body_size.physical_size); [...] #### I am not able to reproduce the problem but I
2007 Nov 15
1
imap process consuming 100% CPU (Dovecot 1.0.3)
> > Is this behavior cured, or do you continue to see it? > No, the behavior isn't cured. We still continue to see it with various clients. I have posted a couple of truss outputs, but so far no resolution. Sorry for the slow response. I've been "fighting other fires". Jackie > Jackie Hunt wrote: > >> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:37 +0200, Robert
2003 Apr 16
1
pop3 coredump
Hi- I was able to get a coredump out of the new pop3 (from 0.99.9-test4) by attempting to simulate the execution environment and simply running the pop3 program. Running the older pop3 from 0.99.8.1 works fine, repeatedly: % /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3 quit +OK Logging out. However running the new one: % /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3.new pop3(user9): Error: Corrupted index file