similar to: strange connection NG

The attached patch should fix the problem with dying imap on "Unrecognized event". The problem is that when we register a handle for IO_ERROR only, we still can get readable/writable event without EV_EOF being set. This case was not handled. -- Vaclav Haisman -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: io-kq.diff URL:

Hi, I want to change ports that Dovecot uses to listen for connections. I have listen = [::] in global section and listen = 0.0.0.0:10143 and listen = 0.0.0.0:10110 in protocol imap and protocol pop3 sections. The problem is that it doesn't seem to work for SSL ports of the two protocols and I get following error when I try to start the service: Fatal: listen(993) failed: Address already in

Hi, I would like to submit the attached patch. It implements IO loop using FreeBSD's kqueue/kevent syscalls. It is based on snapshot of CVS HEAD as of 2005-12-12. I could only give it limited testing on FreeBSD 5.4 but it works fine so far. Vaclav Haisman -------------- next part -------------- diff -rN -u old-dovecot-cvs/autogen.sh new-dovecot-cvs/autogen.sh ---

Hi, the attached patch contains these changes: 2005-12-15 22:18 Vaclav Haisman <v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> * src/lib/ioloop-kqueue.c: Fix IO_ERROR behaviour. * src/lib/ioloop-notify-kqueue.c: New file. * configure.in: Improve kqueue detection and handling. Cleanup. The configure.in changes that are not related to kqueue are there to make autoconf 2.59, automake 1.9.6 and libtool 1.5.20

Dear all, You & every mail-man saw Big Picture of qmail. I assumed qmail is black box.I want to extend big picture, i use qmail admin ,Devocot & vpopmail. I draw a few relation.Can you tell me whether i draw correct?Also i need to if i didn't draw relation tell me that i will draw that. Yours, Mohsen

Hi,all I have a POP3 problem about multi users from one IP address concurrent. [Issue description] The network architecture is as following. I have setup a mail server(sendmail/dovecot) in PlaceA with IP_A. And about 6 users are receving mail from the same IP_B( NATed public IP) in PlaceB. Their mails are many( about 1Mb/hour each) and ususally set fetch time as 10min/fetch. Then they

i use openbsd/i386, dovecot-1.0b3, i see some kevent error/warning message in maillog like this: -------------------------------------------------------- imap(username): kevent(1) in io_loop_handle_add() failed: Bad file descriptor imap(username): kevent(1) in io_loop_handle_remove failed: Bad file descriptor --------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk (/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.././03|L/../../7/03) -m root). The problem is that each time the test runs I get messages like the following in /var/log/messages: Oct 26 04:54:15 35 kernel: ad6: TIMEOUT -

Hi, when I move some recent mail from some mbox folder into Maildir folder the moved email sorts as the first (on top) in the folder while it should be on the bottom with the rest of the recent emails in the folder. This happens only when moving from mbox folder to Maildir folder. I am not sure if it is really Dovecot bug or not but I suspect it could be so because it only happens in this one

Since there have been so many requests, I guess it's time for beta3 now. There are a couple of issues that I'm still concerned about, but those probably happen with beta2 as well. If you're beginning to see more connection hangs/timeouts with this release, please tell me. * Dotlock code changed to timeout faster in some situations when the lock file is old. + Added support for

Hi, I have built two R packages. One of them (PKG1) needs to use the functions of the other package (PKG2). So I need to link these two packages together, so that the functions of PKG2 can be available to PKG1. And when I load one package using 'library("PKG1")', PKG2 can be loaded at the same. Any ideas welcome. -- View this message in context:

Hi Craig: It’s llvm 10.1 I think, I did the same thing, removing everything except the code block but still failed with llvm-as. Thank you Xuan Tang On Sep 3, 2020, 20:14 -0500, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com>, wrote: > I just pasted that code and ran it through llc, opt, and llvm-as. All passed without issue. What version of llvm are you using? > > ~Craig > > >

Hi Craig: I tried that, now the function is like this: ; Function Attrs: norecurse nounwind readnone ssp uwtable define { double, double } @add(double, double, double, double) local_unnamed_addr #0 {   %5 = call double @llvm.experimental.constrained.fadd(double %0, double %2, metadata !"round.downward", metadata !"fpexcept.ignore")   %6 = fadd double %1, %3

I had originally thought that I'd do a complete audit of the Dovecot's sources this weekend, but looks like I didn't. Hopefully I've been writing good enough code that the "1000 EUR for security hole" offer lasts for a long time. :) This release should fix the SSL parameter regeneration problem. There were two changes that were needed to fix it, but I had forgotten the

Hi: I am trying to implement interval arithmetic through llvm. I have a problem with the rounding mode with llvm.experimental.constrained.cos I have two pieces of codes: ; Function Attrs: norecurse nounwind readnone ssp uwtable define double @cosine_down(double returned) local_unnamed_addr #0 {   ; call the llvm intrinsic to perform downward cosine

Hi: Sorry I need to send email directly. I am new to llvm and trying to write interval arithmetic, which requires changing rounding mode during computation. The document I found https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#constrained-floating-point-intrinsics, seems to be doing the trick. Here is the piece of code that I did:

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:26:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:24?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:05:26 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:24?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On

Hi, On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 09:49 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 12:58:22 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 12:15:33PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp > > > xmit used all the desc, the xmit from the __dev_queue_xmit() may

On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:58:49 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 12:10:34 +0800, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > Due to historical reasons, the implementation of XDP in virtio-net is relatively > > chaotic. For example, the processing of XDP actions has two copies of similar > > code. Such as page,

If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp xmit used all the desc, the xmit from the __dev_queue_xmit() may encounter the following error. net ens4: Unexpected TXQ (0) queue failure: -28 This patch adds a check whether sq is full in XDP Xmit. Thanks. Xuan Zhuo (2): virtio_net: separate the logic of checking whether sq is full virtio_net: add checking sq is full