similar to: Another Assertion Failure in Current CVS Version

Hi, An assertion that I haven't seen before: Apr 20 11:15:32 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) gdb output from the core file of imap is attached. My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, INBOX is NFS mounted from a Solaris 10 system, imap and imaps only. Jeff Earickson

We're in a bit of a panic here as we're getting a lot of errors along the lines of: May 2 12:39:00 lenny dovecot: IMAP(XXXXX): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) We didn't see this until our mail servers went under a full load and now we've trashed the ability of nearly all our users to read email.

On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 18:56 +0000, Michael Stevens wrote: > Hi. > > I'm running 1.0alpha5 on FreeBSD 5.3. I'm using mbox mailboxes. > > I keep getting: > > Jan 8 18:53:12 saigo dovecot: imap(mstevens): file > mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion > failed: (start_pos < data_size) > Jan 8 18:53:13 saigo dovecot: child

Hallo! I installed dovecot at a customers and it is not working. Neither the 1.0.alpha4 (Debian testing) nor the 1.0.beta2 (Debian unstable) do. in /var/log/mail.err I get following error message over and over again: Feb 7 07:12:02 harmserv dovecot: imap(duerkop): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) Feb 7 07:12:02

Mar 9 16:15:19 bob dovecot: imap(username): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106(mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) Getting these errors like crazy. Any ideas? Thanks! Regards, Matt Juszczak

Hi, Dovecot 1.0 beta7 is dying on me. My logfile shows: May 10 15:54:28 hermes dovecot: IMAP(alden): UIDs broken with partial sync in mbox file /var/mail/alden May 10 15:54:28 hermes dovecot: IMAP(alden): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) May 10 15:54:28 hermes dovecot: child 14185 (imap) killed with signal 6 I'm

Just installed the latest (Dec. 12) CVS version and one user keeps getting this assertion failure. Todd dovecot: Dec 13 15:53:01 Error: 29718 imap(username): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /mailhome/new/o/h/username/mbox (4863 > 3417, seq=780, idx_msgs=1913) dovecot: Dec 13 15:53:06 Error: 29718 imap(username): file mail-index-transaction.c: line 129

I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it''s data it won''t actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn''t check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn''t actually return anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look valid when it really isnt. Thanks, Signed-off-by:

Same as reported before: Assert: IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) Setup: 1.0alpha1 on Solaris 9, built with gcc 4.0.1 Debug output of the core is attached. Jeff Earickson Colby College -------------- next part -------------- Script started on

Having done a current checkout, creating a new FS and running iozone [1] on it results in an oops [2]. remove_suid is called, accessing offset 14 of a NULL pointer. Let me know if you''d like me to test any fix, do further debugging or get more information. Thanks, Daniel --- [1] # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda4 # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt /mnt# iozone -a . --- [2] [ 899.118926] BUG: unable to

Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc

Found a new segfault in imap. The first log entry always happens on my mailbox, but doesn't seem to affect anything. This is CVS version from Aug. 15. dovecot: Aug 21 17:16:56 Error: 28017 IMAP(todd): Corrupted index cache file /mailhome/new/t/b/todd/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: Duplicated field in header: hdr.RESENT-TO dovecot: Aug 21 17:19:44 Error: child 28017 (imap) killed with

Timo, My first assert in beta2. Syslog said: Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): Cached message offset 94625 is invalid for mbox file /var/mail/m/user Jan 24 09:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file mbox-sync.c: line 1471 (mbox_sync_do): assertion failed: (!sync_ctx->mbox->mbox_sync_dirty || (flags & MBOX_SYNC_UNDIRTY) == 0) Gdb

Hi, I've been running 1.0alpha1 in production since August 18, and got my first assert and core yesterday. Otherwise it has been running flawlessly. My setup: Sun E220R, Solaris 9, compiled dovecot with gcc 4.0.1, configured dovecot like so: #!/usr/bin/sh VERSION=1.0-alpha1 CC=gcc CFLAGS="-g -O" CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/openssl/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/openssl/lib \ ./configure

Dovecot 1.1.7 is running so smoothly that I gave up checking its log files daily. :) I've just had a look, and among the usual "IMAP(username): FETCH for mailbox Sent UID xx got too little data: xx vs xx" messages (that means that unfortunately sometimes some messages are still written truncated) I saw this assertion failure: file mbox-sync.c: line 1305

Hi, I''ve discovered that some btrfs code doesn''t check whether kmalloc() call succeeded. I poorly understand what this code does and how it can be changed, maybe it would be happy with __GFP_NOFAIL. Also there are BUG_ON() after kmalloc()''s, if they could be changed not to panic it would be great. --- ./fs/btrfs/compression.c 2010-07-06 16:45:48.000000000 +0400 +++

Just installed the version from CVS as of Oct. 27. I noticed three problems quite quickly: Still seeing "(imap) killed with signal 14" My INBOX closed with "access error" after reading it for a bit. There's nothing in the logs or anything, but this hasn't happened for quite a while now. There where quite a lot of incoming messages at the time and I was marking

Hi, My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format, mailboxes NFS mounted from another S9 system, imap. I got the following assert yesterday: Jan 30 19:57:15 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line 258 (index_mail_parse_header): assertion failed: (part != NULL) Jan 30 19:57:16 emerald dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] imap(user): file index-mail-headers.c: line

We''ve been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode''s sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik

I've attached two backtraces, one from a segfault and another from an assertion error in imap. I've seen a couple of the same assertion and this is the only segfault. It looks like they could be related. They both have to do with indexing anyway... The code is from CVS as of May 30. The segfault happened while imap was doing searches for my pine filters. I've also noticed that in