similar to: Tools to analyze status/stats?

Folks, I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post. My feeling was the OP is either an ignorant, unappreciative, self-centered, and emotionally

First off GREAT PROGRAM! It's the Wine team that is loosening the tyrannical grip of the "Other" software company on the computer using community worldwide, while at the same time making it easy for Linux users to still have the use of the programs they are used to, in turn making a transition of operating systems easy. That said, on to the issue. The issue is when using Wine

<pre>I have a machine with the follow specs.<br /><br />Linux hermes.business.com 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005<br />i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux<br /><br />pam-0.79-8<br />dovecot-0.99.14-4.fc4<br /><br />No one is able to receive e-mails due to authentication failures and yesterday afternoon<br />they were able to.<br

hi, I am trying to set up dovecot with digest-md5 as authentication mechanism and openldap as passdb. My problem is ... that I just can't get it working. PLAIN authentication works as expected, but no luck with digest-md5. An excerpt from the two configuration files: dovecot.conf: --------CUT-------- auth = default auth_mechanisms = plain digest-md5 auth_userdb = ldap

I'd previously had dovecot running on a Debian server but recently migrated to Suse. The nice, simple setup for dovecot on debian is not as easy using the dovecot sources. My lack of experience I'm afraid! I'd like to continue to use dovecot, especially as my current maildir directories are all set up ready to be use again. On suse (sles9) I have users authenticating by LDAP. In

hi, For some of our customers we provide a pop3 access, and after an upgrade to alpha3, it is not working anymore. All of our data is ldap based and everything is working as before for our IMAP customers, but our POP3 users fail. Obviously the pop3 login process does not read the data correctly that comes from ldap. after enabling mail_debug, I saw the following error in our log:

Hello, I am developing a Java application that requires me to read from and write to a samba share. When developing in a windows environment this was not a problem. I mounted the share as "M:/", built a path to a file, checked if the file exists using the Java function file.exists(), and went on my merry way. Now I am developing in a Linux environment(SuSE 10). I mount the samba

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87715 Bug ID: 87715 Summary: Changing resolution away from 1680x1050 results in scattered display Product: Mesa Version: 10.4 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

> As far as I know, ObjectFile is either COFF, ELF or MachO format, > statically compiled. But the pass manager for applying optimisation > passes works only on llvm-ir. I would not need to apply optimisations on the parts of the program in the object file. These are meant to be optimised beforehand. The only parts I want to run passes on are specific function that I know

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88262 Bug ID: 88262 Summary: 3.19 kernels hang during boot for an NV28 based card Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau

hi, I've just upgraded our dovecot installation to the most recent debian package (0.99.20050712) and now I'm running into some weird problems. Virtual (LDAP based) users cannot login anymore, the logfile shows this: -------CUT------- dovecot: Aug 02 12:34:25 Error: Logins with UID 200 (user some.user) not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file) -------CUT------- yet

Hi, I get my Email from my own SMTP server on the internet using "fetchmail". Some time ago I did the smart thing and configured dovecot to use SSL and the letsencrypt certificate that automatically renews. Welllll..... a few days ago my certificate expired and the fetchmail deamon running in the background had nowhere to complain. So I didn't notice. It turns out that dovecot

Hello Willy, Here is the dump from one of my bitcode files: 0000000 42 43 c0 de 21 0c 00 00 25 05 00 00 0b 82 20 00 As expected, 0x42 (= B), 0x43 (= C), xc0 and 0xde are in correct order. In your case, the first byte is read as 37 (= 0x25). I wonder why? When you check the bytes yourself, you get expected results. When the same bytes are read from Stream object, you get a different result (maybe

I would be surprised if someone hasn''t encountered this already, but I haven''t found any discussion of the nature of this problem. I run RehHat 5.0. If a user makes a mistake in the login process such as the following: login: mistake password: xxx Login incorrect! login: username password xxxx bash$ a ps will show, among other things, 2333 /bin/login --mistake. Since

Hi all, I wrote a program which recovers deleted file from Ext3/Ext2 FS.It's like crash proof program.For past few months i'm trying hard to get feedback or comments or criticizm on the tool.I hope to get from you. The link is , https://sourceforge.net/projects/giis/ Warm Regards, Lakshmipathi.G

This segfault occuring only under valgrind, in shell way, and in gdb way i have Invalid bitcode signature simple_scev_dynamic_array: /home/willy/apollo/llvm/include/llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h:258: storage_type *llvm::ErrorOr<llvm::Module *>::getStorage() [T = llvm::Module *]: Assertion `!HasError && "Cannot get value when an error exists!"' failed. Command terminated by

add -basicaa to your command line :) On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Willy WOLFF <willy.mh.wolff at gmail.com> wrote: > I play a bit more with MemoryDependenceAnalysis by wrapping my pass, and > call explicitely BasicAliasAnalysis. Its still using No Alias Analysis. > > How can I let MemoryDependenceAnalysis use BasicAliasAnalysis? > > Please, find attached my pass. >

I have a pretty simple setup. I''ve got a linux nat box, with some internal hosts. I''ve also got some servers in a dmz. It looks something like this: Internet | (external network) | | | | linux dmz nat hosts |

I picked up the following from Bugtraq. -----Forwarded message from David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET>----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <01BC5D8D.679DD4A0@frank56.pcisys.net> Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 21:56:05 -0600 Reply-To: David Phillips <phillips@PCISYS.NET> Sender: Bugtraq List

Hi, I was wondering how a linux box configured as a firewall stacked up against some of the commercial products like checkpoint-1 and gauntlet. Can someone direct me to a good book or online doc that compares linux to some other firewall methods? Mind you, I''m not talking about a firewall in the classical sense, ie ip forwarding turned off and used as a proxy, but the typical Linux box