similar to: Upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0alpha

What is involved in migrating from 0.99 to 1-stable? (I'd be creating a FreeBSD port to work with, but the main question I have is what would need to be done to configuration files.) Thanks, Jim -- Jim Trigg, Lord High Everything Else O- /"\ Hostmaster, Huie Kin family website \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN Verger and System Administrator, X HELP CURE HTML MAIL All

Hi, I have just noticed that one our box is still running ancient 0.99 version (shame on me). Is there anything what I have to take care about during update? I am completely aware about changes in configuration files so my question is mainly about existing maildirs. L??a -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Dovecot 1.0alpha (tested 0.99.14, 1.0alpha1, 1.0alpha4 and 1.0alpha5) does not return UID number in 'UID STORE uid-number +FLAGS (\Seen)' command response. Issue is not present in 0.99.14. >From IMAP RFC http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3501.txt 6.4.8. UID Command ... However, server implementations MUST implicitly include the UID message data item as part of any FETCH response

I realize that there have been some big changes in features and configuration file settings between 0.99.xx and 1.0-stable, so when I went to perform an upgrade on our testing server, I carefully combed through the configuration files and matched up everything I could. I fired up dovecot-1.0-stable and was pleased to see that it was happily running. I attempted to connect to it, and

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I

Since version 1.0 I experience strange problems with dovecot. At the moment I have beta 7 installed. I use FreeBSD 6.0. * Pop3 works * Imap works, but only when i telnet to localhost * In all other cases I can't connect to the server. Tried with squirrelmail, uebimau and thunderbird. Squirrelmail after a long time waiting: "ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server."

I need to migrate an old mail server running Dovecot (0.99.14) to a new server running Dovecot (1.0.7; as shipped with CentOS 5.2). My plan was to use the imapsync utility as this will "seamlessly" do the conversion from mbox to maildir between the boxes as well. I've got the MasterUser authentication working fine on the new host and was just about to start getting

Hello all, I have 1.0 Alpha 4. Is it better to shut down sendmail, uninstall dovecot 1.0a4 then install 1.0a5, or just install 1.0a5 over the top of 1.0a4? Thanks, Cliff

Great news! yay! I downshifted to dovecot 0.99-14 and pop server is working! Finally a pop-server and postfix and all! And no Courier! or Qmail! Whatever changed in the 1.0 release regarding MySQL is broken, and is working in the .99-14 release. I can finally use my mail server! :-) I'll keep an eye out for the 1.x stable release, hopefully it will have MySQL support working. Maybe

I tried this on a Linux (Ubuntu) server invoking R from the command line and the result was the same, except that I could kill the R session from another terminal window. From: Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt> To: Chris Triggs <cm.triggs at auckland.ac.nz>; "r-devel at r-project.org" <r-devel at r-project.org> Cc: Thomas Lumley <t.lumley at

OK. After checking the 0.99->1.0 migration documentation, it seems I've been a little confused between customflags and keywords. (Though this is partly due to my repeated requests for clarification being ignored.) The page (http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/UpgradingDovecot) says 1.0 does not use .customflags any more. Now, I'm hoping they're still supported, in which case

Hi all, I was looking to upgrade my dovecot .99.14 installation to 1.0alpha5 today and bumped into an issue. My setup is on Mac OS X 10.4 and I am using After reading http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot , I created a default dovecot.conf file with the following information grabbed from my prior installation: Snow:~ ed$ grep -v '^ *#' /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf|grep -v ^$

The issue seems related to R bug report 15012: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15012 As mentioned in the comments there, a pull request to the TRE library has recently been made, but I don't know about its status. Daniel ________________________________________ Von: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> im Auftrag von Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at

Can anyone help me with this issue? The CEO of our company keeps getting IMAP time out errors and "mailbox is in an inconsistent state" messages. He uses Outlook 2003. There are errors on the server side. This is what it says: "Jun 19 08:08:34 burmail imap(ed): Corrupted binary tree file /home/ed/mail/.imap/INBOX/.imap.index.tree: UID to be inserted isn't hi gher

Hi, i would like to ask, what is the Trigg monitor and the CUSUM monitor? Thank you

Hi, I am trying to create a samba server a a AD member, I have set up security = ads. I have made the necessary changes to nsswich.conf and krb5.conf. wbinfo returns a list of user & groups and also maps sucesfully between username and SID and vice versa. I have tried upgrading the fedora supplied binaries to the ones from the redhat mirror. However when doing a getent passwd I am only

Hi... I have come upon a problem with a regular expression which causes base-R to freeze. I have reproduced the phenomenon on several machines running R under Windows 10, and also under OSX on different Apple MACs. The minimal example is:- Oldterm is a vector of characters, e.g. "A", "B", "A", "*", "B" The regular expression is

Hi, I'm currently using Dovecot version 1.0 and I want to update it to the latest version. I know from version .99 to version 1.0 I had to change a few things on the dovecot config. When compiling the latest stable version should I just be able to use the same config I'm using for version 1.0 without making any changes ? Thank you Paul

I've been running dovecot 0.99.11 with postfix and postgresql in a production environment with about 25 real users and a couple hundred aliases split over a few domains for nearly a year now. No problems of any kind that I have noticed. Should I upgrade to the latest dovecot? What changes, if any, will I have to make? I've looked through the archives for a couple months without seeing

HI, First time posting here. can someone do let me know if there is a specific upgrade procedure from 0.99x to 1.x? Any comment will be appreciated. --Ivan. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20060613/0f1c7d94/attachment.htm