similar to: Dovecot and loadbalancer

Hi all, I've a problem with prefetch userdb function on 1.0.alpha4 ? I get this : Error: auth(default): ldap(mylogin,10.3.245.xxx): Multiple password replies Info: auth(default): ldap(mylogin,10.3.245.xxx): base=dc=boursorama,dc=fr scope=subtree filter=(&(objectClass= boursoramaMailAccount)(mailInternalAllowedProtocol=imap)) fields=uid,userPassword An ldapsearch with the same

Hi, somebody have an idea to make dovecot working safly with nfs without lockd ? It seems working without problem except for files ".customflags" and ".subscriptions" is exists a patch for use the dotlock locking method for these files ? Thanks, Cyril Feraudet

Hi all, for one of my developpements, I need to be able to connect an IMAP server with a login but without password. (I use dovecot 1.0.beta3) For the userdb, I use "userdb static" : userdb static { args = uid=114 gid=114 home=/mydev/mail/%u } But I don't know how to allow IMAP connection by my application without password. I won't connect to a database, having a

Hi all, I've a little pb with 1.0-stable on nfs share without lockd : with : - lock_method = dotlock - mmap_disable = yes I've : - dovecot: Jul 22 11:58:33 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxxx): open() failed with index file (null): Bad address with : - lock_method = dotlock - mmap_disable = no I've : - dovecot: Jul 22 11:59:47 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxxx): lock_method=dotlock and

Hi all, I've a problem during a big migration to dovecot. I'm not sure that is a really a dovecot bug ... but maybe somebody here know one solution ... I have more than 150000 imap account to migrate from an obscure mail system based on a database to an imap/dovecot system. During the migration (simple but very long process) I get a "Too many links" error from dovecot.

> You better take a look at doc/mail-storages.txt as stated in the comments > of the configuration file. > thanks, now it works. The dovecot.conf was wrong configured and the permissions in the /home folders where given not correctly Now we are able to read our mail with outlook and via SquirellMails Kind regards, Roland

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736 Bug ID: 1736 Summary: nftables - dynamic update for verdict map from the packet path Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

I'm having a problem with Mail.app and imap folders. I've got a new install of dovecot 1.0beta2, and am only experiencing this problem with Mail. Mutt works as expected, as well as thunderbird. When I create a folder using Mail.app, it is written to ~/Maildir/.INBOX.newfolder, which would be fine, if I wasn't telling everything that I wanted no prefixes. If I move that folder to

Hi all, I get an error when I try to join domain from CentOS 6.5. Have you an idea ? /etc/samba/smb.conf : --------------------- [global] workgroup = XXX server string = Samba Server Version %v log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 realm = XXX.YYY security = ads idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000

Hi, I have an Alteon in test (a sip/rtp load balancer). This Alteon sends to the asterisk box a "SIP OPTIONS" to know if asterisk is alive. However, asterisk sends me a 404 message and not a response like, for example, a Thomson (200 + SDP) I wrote a very little script (you can find it at the end of the email) to send an Options message to asterisk/phones to try. It works

Thanks for the reply. Le 2014-08-26 12:30, steve a ?crit?: > On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 12:02 +0200, Cyril Feraudet wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I get an error when I try to join domain from CentOS 6.5. Have you an >> idea ? >> >> >> /etc/samba/smb.conf : >> --------------------- >> [global] >> workgroup = XXX >>

Hi everybody, we're currently in the process of drafting our new mailserver-setup. Instead of a single-server-setup we'd like to have two equal servers behind a loadbalancer like LVS and shared mailhomes on NFS. We'd like to use dovecot for POP/IMAP, dovecot-deliver as LDA. - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to the same server behind the

We like to set up our mail system in two datacenters but the wiki<https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication> says "Shared folder replication doesn't work correctly..." I'm thinking about using an external loadbalancer to ensure that only one host will get connections. Normal operations: client ==imap=> loadbalancer ==imap=> host1 ==replication=> host2 Host1 or

I currently have samba 3.0.2 working with ldap as a filer sever Only. My question is how would I get samba working as file server that would handle 50k users. My main concern is that I want reliability. I would also like to be able to build horizantally if needed. I was first thing some type of cluster connecting to a SAN but I would rather do it like we do our webservices. We have x

Hi! I'm using dovecot for a while now and really like it. Actually dovecot 1.5 on Debian AMD64. Now I have to use a cifs mounted maildir directory and found it to be quite slow, though I already tuned it a lot. The only way to get it fast was to put INDEX and CONTROL files on the local disc and so outside of the maildirs. Performance is great but the problem is with submissions to

> I have 2 test servers with the below configuration. > > ========================== > Linux OS - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > Dovecot version - 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) > Postfix version - 2.10.1 > ========================== > > Trying to create High Availability. > > I have added both of the above servers behind a F5 load

Forwarded message: > From full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com Wed Apr 21 11:49:12 2004 > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com > From: Darren Bounds <dbounds@intrusense.com> > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] IETF Draft - Fix for TCP vulnerability > Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:19:58 -0400 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > >

Hi! I''ve been using Mongrel in a Rails setup with HAProxy as a loadbalancer. I used to use Pound, but HAProxy is much more performant and has the very nice option to limit the amount of requests sent to the backend servers/processes. In practice, this means that a new incoming request will not be sent to a Mongrel that''s already busy processing a request. There''s

Hi list, We, an OSS advocacy group, setup a Xen 3.1 machine composed of : . a 64 bits dom0 running Debian stable amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running OpenBSD amd64 . 2 hvm domUs running NetBSD i386 This machine is to be hosted and reachable from the Internet, but it will only have one public IP. Naturally, our first tought was to port-forward using iptables / netfilter. We didn''t really

Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both