Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Upgrade 3.4 --> 3.7 went awry: rpmdb hosed"
2005 Jul 20
4
Yum/rpm error (rpmdb versioning issue?)
Has anyone seen this before?
[root at shelob rpm]# yum update
rpmdb: Program version 4.2 doesn't match environment version
error: db4 error(22) from dbenv->open: Invalid argument
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Invalid argument (22)
error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 30, in ?
2005 Jul 14
2
Upgrading from RH AS-3 to ??
Hi!
I'm trying to upgrade my Redhat 3AS server, but I'm encountering
problems.
The first problem was, I didn't know what repository to use.
I settled on http://mirror.centos.org/, but using it is strange, as
not all mirror servers have all of the directories, and so sometimes
links appear broken, but the problem goes away if I hit reload.
A number of them have empty directories,
2004 Sep 21
1
yum updated to 3.3, rpmdb corrupted
I'd guess this is probably something pretty specific to my test box, but when I
yum updated to 3.3 my rpmdb got totally hosed. Unfortunately, I didn't save
the error that occured at the time because a rpm --rebuilddb _appeared_ to fix
the problem. Unfortunately I found out later that I was left with a db that
only contained a subset of the actual install base. I'm now trying to
2008 Jan 10
4
yum hangs when Reading Local RPMDB
All of a sudden yum hangs on a Centos 4.5 (updated to the latest patch
before 4.6) when I try to use it. "clean metadata" didn't help.
The output of -d5 shows it gets to the point of "Reading Local RPMDB" and
then sits there. The process doesn't die, but doesn't seem to do anything
from that point on. strace shows this: futex(0xb76dcae8, FUTEX_WAIT, 2,
NULL
I
2005 Jan 18
6
I'm gonna kill YUM (mailing list version ;-) )
Hi all.
Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer's problems ;-)
), since we've been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr recommended me to post
here, so let's see, I have my faith on you.
I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 .
Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this when I
try to do a yum update:
yum
2006 Sep 06
2
4.4 update quits unexpectedly
After 2 good updates to 4.4, my 3rd is giving me trouble. I did all 3
installs the same:
yum clean all
yum update python-sqlite sqlite yum
yum clean all
yum upgrade
This one, however, quits during the header download. I get "[Errno -1]
Header not complete, trying another mirror", then "[Errno 256] No more
mirrors to try".
I am not going thru a proxy, and I can't find
2005 Jan 18
1
I'm gonna kill Yum AND Outlook
Here we go again:
Hi all.
Most of you already know about my problems (well, my computer?s
problems ;-) ), since we?ve been discussing on the forum. Hughesjr
recommended me to post here, so let?s see, I have my faith on you
I have a dedicated server with RH9 that I upgraded to CentOS 3.4 .
Everything ok, but after the first yum upgrade and reboot I get this
when I try to do a yum update:
2005 Aug 21
3
YUM is seriously fubar
Okay, I have over 9 gigs of spare room on my main hard drive, so I don't
think var is filling up. I've set prelinking to be off (I think), and
yet still, YUM continues to freeze my computer.
If I try to do a search or install, about half the time it will go nuts
on the hard drive, I lose control of the mouse, and eventually I have no
choice but to hard reset.
What's wrong with
2004 Dec 14
4
Issues/thoughts re CentOS-4
This is a list of issues for discussion for CentOS-4. Most of it is
based on my experience from building/maintaining CentOS-2 and observing
CentOS-3. I have not seen the CentOS-4 beta yet so I don't know if any
of this is already done. If these have been discussed on IRC then
perhaps someone could produce a shot summary of the outcomes....?
* Just call it CentOS-4 not 4.1 etc. Too
2006 Aug 30
2
Yum updates packages for other arch too
Hi,
I have the x86_64 arch on my server so therfore i expect that yum
updates only x86_64 packages.
With the last *yum update* i?ve noticed a strange behaviour while
retrieving the needed packeges. As you you see, yum wants install
packages for different architectures:
glibc x86_64 2.3.4-2.25 base 4.9 M
glibc i686 2.3.4-2.25 base 5.1 M
.
.
2005 Mar 03
2
rpm corruption
I have recently deployed a number of CentOS-3.4 boxes and I am seeing
problems with rpm database apparent corruption. db4 errors like
DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND.
I have found that using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 seems to fix the problem
but I can''t find much info on why or if doing that is good or bad.
I have done --rebuilddb but with the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL that might be
making thinks worse... I just
2005 Feb 15
6
no kernel upgrade on 3.3
I have 2 servers:
On both, I did yum update.
One upgraded the kernel, the other didn't.
Why?
TIA,
Dave Augustus
2005 May 19
3
Timezone Configuration
Greetings All,
How to does one go about reconfiguring centos's time zone
configuration (to the eastern time zone (us)), via the command line?
I have tested other GNU/Linux distribution's documentation, tools,
files and relevant details with centos and have thus far been unable
to find a compatible solution.
My apologies if my question is very simple, I have done a fair amount
of
2007 Oct 10
3
yum $releasever thinks it's 1 instead of 3
I just upgraded one of my Tao boxes to Centos 3. The usual procedure is
to do a yum update twice, and all is fine.
This time, I had to rebuilddb before I could run the second yum update,
and once I started this, yum fails. It says that $releasever is "1.0".
Now I realize I could manually edit my yum.conf and make it go to 3, but
this may not fix the problem down the road. Can
2012 Jun 01
1
problems installing parted tool
i have downloaded the CentOS distribution that comes with Xen Cloud
Platform (XCP) at http://www.xen.org/download/xcp/index.html. i am
trying to install the parted utility.
yum install parted
however, i get the following message.
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Setting up Install Process
No package parted available.
Nothing to do
any ideas on what's
2006 Aug 03
2
RHEL4 to CentOS 4
Hi ,
For reasons I will not go in to does anyone know if you can convert a RedHat RHEL4 box to CentOS 4 ? I am hoping this possible with our re installing . If it if what do I need to do to get the system to run yum instead of the RedHat updates.
Thanks
Arun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2009 Feb 23
7
Recover rpm DB corrupted by disk failure?
Over the weekend my workstation (still on CentOS 3) started showing
SMART errors, so we shut it down and moved everything onto a new
drive. On reboot, the RPM database reports as corrupted and "rpm
--rebuilddb" segmentation faults.
Is there any reasonable way to recover from this, short of a complete
reinstall? The machine is otherwise up though it''s quite likely some
files
2008 Aug 07
1
Firewire/IEEE1394 support on centos.plus repro and yum update
Helo,
I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus
repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support.
But when y do a :
# yum update
The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro
I have tried with the
http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it
didn't take the right kernel :
2007 Dec 06
2
centos 5.1 netinstall iso bugged ?
Hi all,
i'm trying out a netinstall test installation.
When asked to where I do want to install I got a bunch of choices.
If i select HTTP I insert:
server: mirror.centos.org
path: centos/$releasever/os/$basearch
but then he says to me that he can't find the "boot.iso" in:
http://mirror.centos.org//centos/$releasever/os/$basearch
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
please note the double
2004 Sep 24
0
Fwd: Re: yum updated to 3.3, rpmdb corrupted
Quoting Martin Hamant <mh at accelance.fr>:
> on my freshly updated system ( 3.3 ):
>
> # cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release 3.3 (final)
> # rpm -qa | wc -l
> 483
>
> And no such error message ...
Indeed, in fact I'd be surprised if everyone was having this problem; I don't
suppose 3.3 would have been released if they were.
What I am suggesting is