similar to: Can't donwload mails with some attacchments

Yes ...Ive configured SAM to the settings in the config file and it tryies to connect then says invalid password , authentication required...It's the right password! I also dont seem to have an icecast GUI for the icecast server that I see in all the youtube tutorials? Therefor I c havent figured out how to start the server? I have accessed the admin interface just fine, but that's about

Hi, printer driver download with W2000/Xp (samba-2.2.7 and cups-1.1.18) and the Adobe PS Driver works fine for our location. But when I try to download a driver with W9X the driver installation widzard starts. Samba logs the following messages... (Cant determine number of printer driver files...) (see second apandix) The installation of the driver works with no error. (see first apendix) Has

That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or should I just grab them using wget? 2012/6/14 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> > wrote: > > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd > like > > to begin gradually extending

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

RC 2 is now available for testing (Early RC1 testing on a RedHat-based system with dynamic provider gateways uncovered a couple of debilitating defects in the enable/disable logic). Thank you for testing, -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > That reminds me: Do the web documents reside in a repository somewhere or > should I just grab them using wget? The website is at http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/www/trunk/ . The llvm docs are in llvm/docs. Which actually makes me wonder if the LLVM-project FAQ (in reference to Chandler's post in

The irony of this reply is killing me :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > You're not alone :) Don't let it bug you. > > I finally decided to install a GMail extension that enables reply-all for > all messages, because I kept forgetting. Perhaps you can find such an > extension or simply enable reply-all by default?

Hi guys, I understand Rails is licensed under the MIT license, does this allow me to write proprietary applications with Rails? Thanks a lot, Ed -- Encontr? a "Tu psic?pata favorito" http://tuxmaniac.blogspot.com Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant and productive. -- Seventh

If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just bare metal. I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the "noise" on the various mailing lists. Cheers, Mikael -- -- Love Thy Frog! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We've being running with Dovecot 1.0-stable since Tuesday, and on the whole it's gone very well (meaning nobody's noticed!). My best estimate is we're using half the disk accesses and 2/3 the CPU of UW-IMAP/Qpopper. We've quite a mixture of error messages in the logs, the most worrying of which is that several times we've had a few seconds of "xxx-login: Can't

Some of my users seem to be receiving the same e-mail over and over. This doesn't happen all the time, just once in a while it seems to get stuck in a loop. Is it possible that dovecot is the culprit here or is this a problem with something else? I'm running Postfix/amavisd/dovecot on Slackware 10.1. Regards, Savage

Hi, Just a brief follow-up on my link time issue: It was caused by excessive trashing; I tried rebuilding on a box with 8 gigs of RAM and observed the memory load while linking clang.exe: It peaked at 5 gigabytes memory, so now I've written this piece of info into the LLVM/Windows document that I posted earlier (I have already made a substantial number of corrections in the document). All in

Hi, all! I have the following environment here: - A Windows 2000 domain, with one server running Windows 2003 Server - A kerberos realm, using MIT Kerberos - A samba server, with security=ads The Windows 2003 server have a trust relationship with the MIT kerberos realm. Users logs on that kerberos realm on their Windows workstations, and are supposed to have access to the shares at samba

Hello, I'm new to LLVM and I had a question about it: when we call the JIT::runFunction, since llvm doesn't has a full FFI, there are some cases in which the JIT needs to codegen a stub function to call the function we are interested, my question is: this stub function will remains in the module until when ? What are the most efficient way to remove it from the module and memory ? For a

Email Lists wrote: > -> Once the number three, being the third number, be > -> reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Chicken of Antioch towards thy > foe, > > Ok... after much chasing around the yard and far too much clucking > baaaagokkkkk racket... I have the chicken!!! > > Still alive I might add. :-) > > Now, where in scripture do I find this again? :-)

Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> > The irony of this reply is killing me :) > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> You're not alone :)

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > If nobody else is doing it, I can translate the FAQ into Sphinx as I'd like > to begin gradually extending it so that it some day becomes more than just > bare metal.  I figure that extending the FAQ is one way to reduce the > "noise" on the various mailing lists. > > > Cheers,

btw, the "default reply-to-all" extension for gmail works great! On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Hehe, I intentionally left out the group because I just wanted to cheer > you up and let you know that there's more than one "retard" on the list. > > > 2012/6/14 Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> >

Hello, I'm using the llvm-c bindings for C, but I'm getting some problems, the LLVMCreateExecutionEngine is returning 1 but the error message is an empty string (it's !=NULL). The steps I'm doing is to create the module, then I call LLVMVerifyModule to verify and it works fine, later I call LLVMCreateModuleProviderForExistingModule and it returns !=NULL MP, so it's ok, but

Folks- With Rails 2.0.2, I''m seeing mocha failures where they did not fail with Rails 2.0.1 test_set_to_process_fail_in_transaction(FileRecordTest): NoMethodError: undefined method `ord'' for 63:Fixnum /home/wolpert/svn/rubylms/vendor/plugins/mocha/lib/mocha/class_method.rb:45:in `hidden_method''