similar to: Recommended dovecot version

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Recommended dovecot version"

2005 Aug 31
4
Oddities with Debian unstable dovecot
Hello, I'm running an Debian etch box with unstable and ever since the last upgrade to dovecot, I've seen odd things. At times, I would see emails would go missing from the Inbox or other folders, and I couldn't move emails that were moved from the Inbox to another folder back into the Inbox. These have seen gone away since I removed all dovecot.* files and .index* files from my
2005 Nov 17
2
Dovecot LDA config problem on RHEL 4 x86_64
Hello, Has anyone succeeded on configuring and compiling Sieve capable Dovecot LDA on RHEL 4 x86_64 platform? I am having problems with configure script hanging on sed while creating Makefiles. # ./configure --with-dovecot=../dovecot .. checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking for library containing
2008 Jan 20
4
v1.1.beta14 released (Compile Error)
On Jan 20, 2008, at 12:15 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:48:09 +0200 > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > Subject: [Dovecot] v1.1.beta14 released > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <1200836889.12450.99.camel at hurina> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >
2005 Jul 12
5
mysql
Hello, Does dovecot require mysql in order to work? Fedora rpms are claiming mysql dependencies. I'm sure you're aware of the long-lived arguement of postgresql v. mysql. If it wasn't your intention to force this, then please snarl at Red Hat. If it was your intention, then grrrrr! Thanks for this product. I like it for it's speed and stability. Jim Edwards
2005 Jan 26
1
mbox slowness in dovecot-1.0-test61
Hi, We're trying out Dovecot to see if it's a good replacement for UW-imapd. It seems to be very slow in opening an mbox file, even after it's been indexed. (I mean way slower than UW) Here's some info on the system: Dovecot-1.0-test61 SuSE 8.1, Linux kernel 2.4 Using NFS to access mail. I've tried turning off mmap, using dotlocking, using fcntl locking (lockd, etc. are
2005 Feb 23
1
Nightly stable & SSL-problems
Getting it otherwise to work, but I still can't get it to listen any SSL-ports. been testing: protocols = imap imaps pop3 pop3s listen = 193.65.59.150 ssl_listen = 193.65.59.150 doesn't help. with: ssl_disable = no of course. protocol imap { # Login executable location. login_executable = /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login # IMAP executable location mail_executable =
2005 Nov 29
3
Is Timo OK?
Hi, does anyone know where Timo is around lately? I haven't seen a post from him for some weeks now and "normally" Timo is quite active when it comes to supporting his 'dovecot' warp drive :-) Udo Rader -- bestsolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH http://www.bestsolution.at -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:
2005 Oct 21
1
imaps on alternate ports
I'm trying to test out dovecot 1.0 alpha 3 prior to an upgrade from dovecot-0.99.14, but I cannot get imaps listening on anything other than 993. I've tried putting listen = *:2023 in the global section or in the imap { } section. No luck. What is the proper format for a config that only runs imaps and only listens on a particular port? -- Andrew Clark Campus Network Programmer
2005 Mar 07
1
Upgrade to new server question
I'm vainly trying to get a new server ready to become the default mail server. We have a SAN, so I don't need to move the mailboxes (I can mount the same partition from both machines), but the question is what version of dovecot to load. I'm assuming that I cannot run both 0.99.14 and 1.00.x on the same maildirs (the indexes differ?). However, is it safe for me to mount the
2005 Sep 07
1
More verbose logging of POP transactions?
Hi all - I'm brand new to dovecot (0.99.14 on freebsd 5) and am just playing with it a bit. POP works just fine, but the only thing that shows up in my logs is this: Sep 7 11:46:25 freebsd5 pop3-login: Login: philip [10.28.61.200] Thought maybe syslog was quietly eating things, but told dovecot to use it's own log file and it didn't improve. Is there a way to turn on more
2005 Nov 03
1
assertion problems w/ 1.0alpha4
Hey list, I have been using 0.99.14 for a while now but recently decided to try to upgrade to 1.0alpha4 to get the latest and greatest. I'm building from source myself on a Slackware 10.0 machine. Slackware ships with UW-IMAP configured to keep your inbox in /var/spool/mail and your other folders in ~/. I've been using the same setup for dovecot so that the migration is
2005 Sep 27
1
Mail directory funkiness
I am using dovecot-0.99.14-4.fc4 on FC4, was testing using mbox and than switched to using Maildir. default_mail_env = maildir:~/Maildir >From evolution when I create a folder the folder is created in ~/mail instead of ~/Maildir I am still rather new to dovecot, but this does not make sense. I made sure to restart dovecot, even added a .procmailrc. cat .procmailrc
2005 Nov 01
1
popa3d migration problem
Hello, I tried to migrate from popa3d to dovecot but I couldn't manage with 'pop3_reuse_xuidl = yes' option. First of all it turned out that the feature is not supported in dovecot for Fedora Core 4 (dovecot-0.99.14-4.fc4). So I downloaded latest stable release of Dovecot but it didn't have this option included too. Then I compiled the newest alpha version (dovecot 1.0.alpha4)
2005 Nov 21
1
dovecot-lda macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
I'm trying to get dovecot-lda working on a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE box (also had the same problem on 5.4) When I run autogen.sh I get the following output: aclocal:configure.in:13 <http://configure.in:13>: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal. configure.in <http://configure.in>: installing
2005 Dec 06
1
Segfault when using multiple servers
Should it be possible to run multiple dovecot servers on the same mailboxes (Maildir in my case)? I've a setup where 2 dovecot 0.99.13 servers write to the same mailboxes, which dovecot apparently does not like too much. Example (using imap): - Login with mail client on server1 - Login with webmail on server2 - Delete a mail using webmail on server2 - Hit send/receive in the mail client
2004 Sep 02
1
1.0-test38
http://dovecot.org/test/ - Recent flag fixes - saving/copying mails into maildir which didn't have index files was broken - output stream fix - pop3 crashfix - mbox_dirty_syncs fixes, also disabling it didn't work before - etc. There are still some crashes and I don't remember if I fixed a problem with mboxes where expunging mails while new mails were coming caused some
2004 Sep 05
2
1.0-test40
http://dovecot.org/test/ - Fixed dying with SIGIO signal with busy Maildir + Linux + IDLE system - Fixed maildir syncing: "UIDs not ordered in file" errors could have occured sometimes wrongly - --with-ioloop=epoll enables epoll code with Linux 2.6. Untested after my changes. - Pretty big changes in internal index handling code (I started this change 2-3 months ago..) Keywords are
2004 Oct 12
1
Does dovecot support subfolders in Outlook (and in general)
Ok, I am playing around with dovecot and things are running relatively smoothly. I am using Outlook as that is what the client uses for Email. I can copy messages to and from the IMAP folder. I can create folders from the root directory fine. My question is this. I have folders like this: IMAPServer --Inbox --Trash --WorkToDo Now when I try and create a subfolder in "WordToDo"
2004 Dec 08
1
Non standart mbox path
Hi! I need set to dovecot non standart mbox path. For example, /var/service/mail/%u. How I can do it? I see default_mail_env parameter, but I don't undestend how it used. Thanks!
2004 Dec 19
1
1.0-test59
http://dovecot.org/test/ No-one had been testing 1.0-tests with Evolution? It was pretty much completely broken with messages having attachments. - test58's output stream code change were entirely wrong and caused bad breakages with mbox. - Named pipes are now treated as write-only mboxes (blocks if no-one is reading, perhaps it should timeout in a few seconds?) - FETCH BODY[n.xxx]