similar to: a few questions about my experience with alpha1

As promised a few days ago, 1.0.alpha1 release is now available from Dovecot web page. Changes since 1.0-test80 include only one mbox assert crashfix and removed fsync() call when writing to transaction log, making it a bit faster. I changed the version number also since 1.0-tests to 1.0.alpha. I know '-' is problematic to binary package builders, maybe the new versioning is better?

I changed servers at the same time as changing from Alpha1 to Alpha2 but I'm on a faster server so it should be faster. But it seems slower especially deleting server side messages. Using mbox . Anyone else seeing tis?

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig I wanted to start stabilizing v2.2 release some months ago already, but I somehow got stuck adding more and more features. Now it looks like all of the necessary API changes are done, so everything I'm planning on near future can still be added to v2.2 without

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/alpha/dovecot-2.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig I wanted to start stabilizing v2.2 release some months ago already, but I somehow got stuck adding more and more features. Now it looks like all of the necessary API changes are done, so everything I'm planning on near future can still be added to v2.2 without

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/alpha/dovecot-2.0.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/alpha/dovecot-2.0.alpha1.tar.gz.sig So here's the first alpha version of Dovecot v2.0. There are still a couple of things left to do, but in general it should work for most people. I started using it for my own mails a few days ago and it seems to work without errors. Largest changes since v1.2:

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/alpha/dovecot-2.0.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/alpha/dovecot-2.0.alpha1.tar.gz.sig So here's the first alpha version of Dovecot v2.0. There are still a couple of things left to do, but in general it should work for most people. I started using it for my own mails a few days ago and it seems to work without errors. Largest changes since v1.2:

Hello, after one small modification I was able to compile samba. I have not yet tried to use it, but at least swat is working. It would be nice if anyone could modify the current code to resolve the specified problems. Mike The Problems: Only a nuisance: uid_t and gid_t are unsigned: /GNU-Source/samba-2.2.0-alpha1/source/smbd/sec_ctx.c: In function `initialise_groups':

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the first alpha release of Dovecot v1.1. I hope that it stabilizes into final release within a few months. There are a lot of new features since v1.0. The most important ones are listed at the end of this post. This is the only v1.1.alpha announcement I send

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the first alpha release of Dovecot v1.1. I hope that it stabilizes into final release within a few months. There are a lot of new features since v1.0. The most important ones are listed at the end of this post. This is the only v1.1.alpha announcement I send

Config shows... # 1.1.alpha1: /usr/local/conf/dovecot.conf protocols: imaps ssl_listen: 69.94.137.124:10943 login_dir: /common/pkgs/dovecot-1.1-alpha1/var/run/dovecot/login login_executable: /common/pkgs/dovecot-1.1-alpha1/libexec/dovecot/imap-login mail_debug: yes auth default: verbose: yes debug: yes debug_passwords: yes passdb: driver: sql args:

Hello Timo, I'm running dovecot-1.0.rc15 (imap and pop) postfix-2.3.5,1 procmail-3.22_6 (which is my LDA) on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE I'm still using the mbox format (I'm planning to migrate to Maildir soon), mailboxes are on an NFS filesystem. I regulary see stale dotlocks files (either from dovecot (29 bytes, hold the pid of the process) or procmail (1 byte) and processes

I'm using RC15 on Solaris 9. The wiki indicates that when a dovecot-shared file exists, "Dovecot uses the same permissions and GID when it creates index files, dovecot-uidlist file, new mail files, etc." In my case, Dovecot *is* creating new index files based on dovecot-shared, but dovecot-uidlist and individual message files don't completely match the permissions/group

During the early Dovecot LDA brainstorming discussions, there was some talk about the possibility of including an LMTP interface, and I've noticed that there's an "is it needed?" question about LMTP in Dovecot's TODO file. I'd like to put in a vote for LMTP, and I'm wondering if anyone else has a need for it. Specifically, I'd love an LMTP-enabled LDA that uses

Hi *, running dovecot 1.2.alpha1 I find the following messages in the log: Sep 10 01:28:38 seymour dovecot: IMAP(steffen,192.168.28.31): fchown(/home/Mail/steffen/subscriptions.lock) failed: Operation not permitted Sep 10 01:28:38 seymour dovecot: IMAP(steffen,192.168.28.31): file_dotlock_open() failed with subscription file /home/Mail/steffen/subscriptions: Operation not permitted Sep 10

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or v1.2.rc1. I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes like there were in 0.99->1.0 or

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or v1.2.rc1. I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes like there were in 0.99->1.0 or

I just upgraded my production box from 1.0-stable to 1.0.alpha1. I've noted some new errors in my dovecot logs: Aug 28 23:23:56 cliff dovecot: IMAP(rsferra): Corrupted index cache file /mail/mcad.edu/rsferra/Maildir/.Sent Items/dovecot.index.cache: indexid changed Aug 28 23:33:57 cliff dovecot: IMAP(acarr): Corrupted transaction log file /mail/mcad.edu/acarr/Maildir/.Deleted

Hi, I'm currently using 1.0.alpha1 without luck regarding a namespace issue. Maybe it's a general understanding problem on my side, but let's see :-) I would like to have my mail stored in Maildir format below ~/.maildir/, which works fine so far. I want any (sub)folders to be created like this: ~/.maildir/ /cur /new /tmp /.Folder/ /cur /new /tmp /.Subfolder/

Hi Timo, Just a quick question: do index files still need removing when upgrading from 1.0-stable (as in the testXX series) or will Dovecot regenerate them automatically? I'm expecting to go with 1.0-stable on Tuesday for my 20,000 users (as that's what I've been testing), but if we see lots of index issues, I may want to upgrade to alpha1 (or later) fairly soon afterwards and it

Just compiled samba-2.0.0-alpha1 on SGI Irix 6.2 (using vendor cc). It compiles and is running. Did env CC=cc CFLAGS=-n32 configure --prefix=/var make make install Initially, I tried to build outside the source tree but this failed. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ (Mr) David Billinghurst Comalco Research and Technical Support PO Box 316, Thomastown, Vic, Australia, 3074 Phone: +61