similar to: Error message? less messages

I have just installed my mail server on a Ubuntu Linux V.7.10 box with sendmail and dovecot imap from the Ubuntu packages. Each time the machines boots, I get the following messages: Starting mail server: dovecotWarning: Fixing permissions of /var/run/dovecot to be world readable Warning: Corrected permissions for login directory /var/run/dovecot/login After the boot the permissions visible

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1768 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjelen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- Created attachment 2523

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1768 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2523|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> ---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED CC| |jjelen at redhat.com Resolution|FIXED

Yes, it should incoming mail to inbox, where replication was requested (and mail was replicated succesfully, of course). After expunge via POP3, replication was not called at all. (It doesn't happens on IMAP connections, if I didn't mentioned in previous message) Log: Jul 26 10:54:11 mda11 dovecot: lmtp(jakub@***)<339><mMJrGzOMWVtTAQAALagawQ>: Debug: INBOX: Mailbox opened

Okay so it does work from smbclient, however I still can't get windows 10 to auth without prefix. Will try tommorow (CEST) at work on windows 7 one. S pozdravom, Jakub Veselý Správca siete GJH Novohradská 3, 82109 Bratislava 02/210 28 328 2015-08-16 20:56 GMT+02:00 Jakub Veselý <happy at gjh.sk>: > Never mind I am an idiot. I have been experimenting with passwords and was >

Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.3.2.1 on Xenial from upstream packages on two Dovecot servers connected with dsync over TCP. E-mails which are deleted via POP3 protocol are not correctly deleted on second server via dsync. Jul 25 09:29:19 mda11 dovecot: pop3(jakub@***)<7587><8xaJ1c1x9uEqAB7QADwAAAAAAAAAAL7v>: expunge: box=INBOX, msgid=<6a75db5d84ff257216a4340d7c0405b2 at

Never mind I am an idiot. I have been experimenting with passwords and was writing the wrong one after edit. It DOES work from smb client. S pozdravom, Jakub Veselý Správca siete GJH Novohradská 3, 82109 Bratislava 02/210 28 328 2015-08-16 20:51 GMT+02:00 Jakub Veselý <happy at gjh.sk>: > Edited smb.conf to match yours and restarted both smbd and winbind. Did > not work. Tried to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1768 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- Created attachment 2524 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2524&action=edit patch to verify this problem in regress test suite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelen <jjelen at redhat.com> --- Created attachment 2576 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2576&action=edit upstream patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Hello, Yeah, sorry, you are right. My new idea is that only one ExitBB is found because Header ("for.body") is already marked as visited. I'm pretty sure that someone had a good reason to do this that way, but I can't find it out :) Dan, can you look at this patch? Thanks -Jakub -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Here is our smb.conf: [global] netbios name = SAMBA-TEST workgroup = <dom> security = ADS realm = AD.<dom>.SK encrypt passwords = yes idmap config *:backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 70001-150000 idmap config <dom>:backend = ad idmap config <dom>:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config <dom>:range = 2000-60000 winbind nss info = rfc2307 winbind

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at

The following message occurs every two minutes in my log file when in diagnostic mode. Aug 22 13:58:00 WARNING[1133735216]: File chan_sip.c, Line 421 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call 46afc0866a7987591248e29d299e47ee@10.1.1.63 for seqno 102 (Request) Aug 22 14:00:01 WARNING[1133735216]: File chan_sip.c, Line 421 (retrans_pkt): Maximum retries exceeded on call

On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli

Hello, Simply removing that "return true" causes the code to search blocks outside of loops for side effects. That's not what the code is supposed to do. Dan On Nov 27, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Jakub Staszak wrote: > Hi, > > Because of this "return true" not every block was visited and only one ExitBB was found (instead of two). Thus, loop was optimized as a trivial

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at

On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli

On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 06:56 +0000, William Kennington wrote: > Does fedora have gcc5 patches? I believe they applied some of the 5.2 > changes. I'm not an expert on the gcc package, but looking at the changelog it appears to be be following the upstream 5.x branch: * Thu Jun 18 2015 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat.com> 5.1.1-4 - update from the 5 branch - fix C++ ICE in

Hello, Fixed patch attached. Can anyone test it? Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr5373.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 5846 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100811/8c0c364b/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- On Aug 6, 2010, at