similar to: Debian has moved to 1.0stable

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Debian has moved to 1.0stable"

2003 Dec 02
1
Dovecot 0.99.10.4 for Debian
I've packaged 0.99.10.4. Owing to the continued downtime on the Debian servers, I've temporarily put the .debs up on my own site. The URL is http://www.braincells.com/debian/ A backport to woody is also available. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2004 Jul 06
1
Debian woody backport of 0.99.10.6 now available on backports.org
Well, the backports.org people finally installed my backport of the latest stable version of dovecot. Please remove the Braincells apt source form /etc/apt/sources.list and add these lines instead. deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot openldap2 postgresql openssl deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot (If you are using other backports you can merge dovecot etc.
2005 Jul 22
1
Re: Bug#319504: Bug in 0.99.14 mbox handling - mail UIDs are renumbered without bumping UIDVALIDITY
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, David McBride wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.14-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and > distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original > Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. > > Specifically, this bug deals with
2005 Nov 06
2
1.0alpha4 uploaded to Debian unstable
I finally got some free time and uploaded 1.0alpha4. It will arrive in the archive by tomorrow afternoon. Together with the most recent libssl0.9.8 upgrade I think this will fix the SSL problems users have been facing. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2004 Jun 20
1
Debian dovecot news
I uploaded 0.99.10.6 to sid. Owing to the importance of the dot lock fix, I've tried to have this pushed to sarge quickly. Let's see how that goes. I've prepared a backport of 0.99.10.6 to woody which should be showing up on www.backports.org soon hopefully. In the meantime, if you desperately need it and don't mind working out dependencies yourself, you can find it at
2004 Jul 30
2
Patch for 0.99.10.8
I uploaded 0.99.10.8 to Debian but I needed the patch below to get it to compile. --- dovecot-0.99.10.8.orig/src/auth/db-mysql.h +++ dovecot-0.99.10.8/src/auth/db-mysql.h @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ #ifndef __DB_MYSQL_H #define __DB_MYSQL_H -#include <mysql.h> +#include <mysql/mysql.h> +#include <mysql/errmsg.h> struct mysql_connection; struct mysql_request; -- Jaldhar H. Vyas
2003 Apr 30
0
Debian packages for 0.99.9
I uploaded the new version to sid today. Apart from the new version a big change is that it has now been split into 4 pieces. dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d are the imap server and the pop3 server rspectively. They are seperate so you can install one without the other. dovecot-common contains the files they both use. dovecot is just a dummy to ensure smooth upgrades for users of older
2004 Aug 09
3
Debian sarge release and dovecot
In what must surely be the first sign of the apocalypse, Debian is actually freezing in preperation for a new release. Probably the last day for uploads will be August 17. Is there likely to be another dovecot release by then? In the event of 0.99.10.9 being the released version, are there any other patches Debian users would like me to include? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at
2003 Feb 03
1
About the dovecot package (fwd)
Dear Timo, What do you think of this? Fyi, I've been getting the same thing lately and I'm wondering if gnutls is to blame? (i've had inexlicable SIGSEGVs in other apps before due to it.) Tomorrow I'll try with openssl but I was wondering if you had any other ideas? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2003 Mar 19
1
Dotlocking doesn't work?
A Debian developer had this to say: > >> Files in the above dir are group mail, and the dir is group mail. However, > > > all binaries in /usr/lib/dovecot are root/root. I have set them all to g+s, > > > and group mail, and now the imap process can lock the INBOX. > > > > > imap should be the only one that needs to be setgid mail. > > Actually,
2005 Aug 10
0
Re: dovecot 0.99.20050712-1
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Nick Maynard wrote: > Yep - I too saw that posting on the dovecot list... sadly after I posted > to this one. I thought the best thing to do was probably to wait > quietly, but I suppose giving him a friendly poke can't do any harm > (Hello, Jaldhar!). > > Thanks all, > Apologies for the delay but I have now prepared a backport. The problem is
2003 Jun 24
0
New dovecot Debian packages.
I forgot to mention it here: Christof alerted me to the fact that there was a typo in my package which was causing LDAP support to fail. So I made new packages bringing them upto 0.99.10.rc2 in the process and uploaded them to unstable last night. They should arrive in the archive today. A backport to woody is also available from http://www.braincells.com/open/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar
2003 Nov 12
0
0.99.10.2 for debian
I just uploaded it to sid. A woody backport is available from http://www.braincells.com/open/ I came across an error: giving --without-cyrus-sasl2 to the configure script doesn't work i.e. it looks for -lsasl anyway. Other than that, it seems to be working fine. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2005 Sep 26
0
1.0alpha3 packages for debian
Sorry this took even longer than I thought but they should be arriving in unstable this afternoon. I also have a backport for stable available at http://www.braincells.com/backports This directory is not aptable so manually install the packages for now. (Hopefully backports.org will have their sarge repository open soon. When that happens they will move there.) The configuration file
2003 Sep 05
1
Debian bug #201444: More verbose logging
I brought this up a while ago but the submitter is wondering if there has been any progress on this issue. He says: It would be extremely nice to have a little bit more detailed logging, and I believe it doesn't really require that much code. I use now a daemon which logs login (name, ip; as dovecot does), and logout (with name, logout reason if any special) with the numbers of
2003 Dec 16
3
Re: Bug#224092: Dovecot IMAP: detection of folders
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jeroen van Disseldorp wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.10.4-2 > Severity: normal > > When accessing a maildir with "all folders" instead of "only subscribed > folders", dovecot wrongfully reports its index-files (.imap.*) as mail > folders. When the client (KMail 1.5.2 in my case) checks for email, it > aborts halfway
2005 Jan 03
0
Wanted: gnutls11 support
I talked to Timo about this before and even provided the beginnings of a patch but don't have enough time to really do a proper job. Anyway, dovecot doesn't work with recent versions of the GNU TLS library. As a result, I compile the Debian package with OpenSSL. However some of the other libraries used, such as OpenLDAP are linked against GNU TLS so Dovecot is linked against both. And
2006 Apr 18
0
Debian stable backport for 1.0beta7
Just to let you know .debs are available at http://www.backports.org/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2005 Oct 28
0
Dovecot problems on Debian
If you have been bitten by bug #334180 and dovecot 1.0alpha3-2.0.1 rest assured the problem is being worked on. In the meantime you should downgrade to -2 which can be found at: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/08/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/ -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2003 Oct 02
2
Patches
As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following patches: * segfault when user home directory is empty * Proper PAM service name * Make suid work on 2.6 kernels Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a