similar to: add inotify support to dovecot

Hi Reuben, I hope you don't mind me copying the dovecot list again. > dovecot: Aug 21 04:08:22 Error: IMAP(reuben): inotify_rm_watch() failed: > Invalid argument Odd. > This is with a 2.6.13-rc6-mm1 release. I've posted to LKML because there is > also a kernel stack produced at one point which looks inotify related (but the > messages above are contant). > See

Hi, I am compiling dovecot and I found dnotify & inotify. What does dnotify or inotify do ? do i need it. Thanks

Hi there We have a Samba-based "upload server" where people put files to be processed. Anyway, when they upload files, a Unix-based script runs and moves the files off. However, the Windows explorer app doesn't "notice" the removal, and the user still sees the files. If they F5/refresh explorer, the files indeed have disappeared. If I have two explorer windows open

Hi, Is there any plans to use the Linux inotify, which is a major improvement over dnotify ? (Linux mechanism for communicating filesystem events to user space) Regards, -- Nico ?crivez dans l'ivresse, mais relisez-vous ? jeun. -+- Andr? Gide (1869-1951) -+-

Hi, I recently switched from courier imap to dovecot. With courier I had a working IDLE setup that informed me immediately when new mail arrived. With Dovecot it is different, sometimes i get an immediate result but most of the time it takes a rather long time for the notification to return to the client. For testing purposes I set mailbox_idle_check_interval = 1 and i now get the same

Hi, the attached patch contains these changes: 2005-12-15 22:18 Vaclav Haisman <v.haisman@sh.cvut.cz> * src/lib/ioloop-kqueue.c: Fix IO_ERROR behaviour. * src/lib/ioloop-notify-kqueue.c: New file. * configure.in: Improve kqueue detection and handling. Cleanup. The configure.in changes that are not related to kqueue are there to make autoconf 2.59, automake 1.9.6 and libtool 1.5.20

http://dovecot.org/ It's hot in here. Something like 25-30c for many days now. My brains don't work in that heat. So, this is still not an 1.0-alpha1. I'll put it out when I think the release will actually be fully working :) Changes since test76: - Fixes to FETCHing MIME body parts, especially with message/rfc822 attachments. We hadn't been handling this entirely correctly

On 07/15/2019 04:01 AM, Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > Same thing for me, as I described here: > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190708/279184.html > > I think the problem is that the patch assumes that if sys/inotify.h > exists, then IN_EXCL_UNLINK is defined in it. > > But I think that there are old versions of inotify.h

I've been researching the state of 'file alteration monitoring' technology on Linux. Famd uses dnotify to inefficently monitor a handful of directories. The replacement for dnotify is being worked on in the kenel and it's called inotify. If I understand it correctly and they get it finished, it would be an awesome addition to rsync. With it, you could run rsync to update a

I've run this test on every permutation of poll and notify: can NOT reproduce the crash: --with-ioloop=select --with-notify=none --with-ioloop=select --with-notify=dnotify --with-ioloop=select --with-notify=inotify --with-ioloop=poll --with-notify=none --with-ioloop=poll --with-notify=dnotify --with-ioloop=poll --with-notify=inotify CAN reproduce the crash: --with-ioloop=epoll

Hi List! Attached is a patch to configure.in to test that epoll, poll, inotify, kqueue and dnotify actually work. It also attempts to select the best one for you if none specified. This supercedes my previous patch in the re beta9 thread. Hopefully get this in Gentoo's beta9 ebuild soon. Thanks -- Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org> Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking)

Hi, So I was testing things with inotify notifications enabled and noticed that when I a) select a mailbox other than the inbox b) IDLE c) copy mail into the /new folder in that mailbox nothing happens! So I straced it and it always opens the inbox's new/ and cur/ directories for notifications. Is that the correct behaviour? I assumed that if I select some mailbox other than the inbox, IDLE

Hi, I was trying to crosscompile dovecot, but I got some error: --with-notify=inotify don't work, as it try to run a test program to verify if inotify is supported in the building platform. Solved with --with-notify=dnotify. Ihmo, is more a hack than a solution. | checking whether posix_fallocate() works... configure: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling I can't

hi, the current code has changed include linux/inotify.h to sys/inotify.h since 2006-01-17, but that won't work with inotify*.h as documented in the wiki. One has to either revert back to linux/inotify.h, or add #include <sys/inotify-syscalls.h> to both configure.in and src/lib/ioloop-notify-inotify.c Or, just symlink sys/inotify.h -> linux/inotify.h. That's on Debian 3.1

Hi, I note that dovecot supported inotify from -test77, and now the Linux kernel supports it starting from linux-2.6.13-rc3. So in theory I should be set to go. I'm using an -mm kernel, and it was built with inotify, on FC4/devel. However when trying to build with it using --with-notify=inotify, I always seem to be getting this message: checking for poll... yes configure: error:

Hi, I'm trying to compile Dovecot beta2 with inotify support, but this is unsuccessfull. First, it seems that the configure script is looking for inotify.h in /usr/include/sys, whereas it is in /usr/include/linux on my Debian Sarge system. But that's a minor point, let's make a symlink. % dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/inotify.h linux-kernel-headers: /usr/include/linux/inotify.h % dpkg

Hi, I'm going through my messages log and I've noticed a large amount of the following error going on. What affect would this have on the smb client that is connected to those pid's? Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: [2010/03/11 11:35:24, 0] smbd/notify_inotify.c:293(inotify_setup) Mar 11 11:35:24 process1 smbd[25349]: Failed to init inotify - Too many open files

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:32:40PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:25AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > >> What is the error message? > > > > > > > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition

I service a small office with 6 XP computers. I just installed a server running CentOS 5.4 and Samba 3.0.33. They use a program called "On-screen Takeoff". This program accesses a couple database files that live on the shared drive. "Projects.ldb" and "Projects.mdb" On-screen takeoff stays open all day, and maintains access to it's database files all day.

(dovecot v1.2.16) I've notice the log notices about increasing /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances on my servers, and started wondering if inotify works for network/cluster filesystems.. I found this: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=311194 which says that there's no mechanism for one node to tell another node that a directory changed for GPFS.. And I