similar to: separate SSL certificates for pop3s and imaps

From the Dovecot 1.0.1 sample dovecot.conf file: # If you want UIDL compatibility with other POP3 servers, use: # UW's ipop3d : %08Xv%08Xu ... # Note that Outlook 2003 seems to have problems with %v.%u format which was # Dovecot's default, so if you're building a new server it would be a good # idea to change this. %08Xu%08Xv should be pretty fail-safe. #

Hi, Whenever I create a new email user, telnet fails until an email is sent to that user to create his mbox. This is the error that it gives. Anyone know how to fix this? I could create the email account script to touch the users mbox, but I havn't needed to do this in the past with ipop3d and dovecot on a different server. [root at mail log]# telnet localhost 110 Trying 127.0.0.1...

###### ## ## ###### ## ### ## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ## ### ## ###### . ## ## . ######. Secure Networks Inc. Security Advisory March 2, 1997

Best Dovecot devs, We moved from UW-imap&pop3 to Dovecot this morning (~500 accounts) and reduced our traffic from the home directory server to the imap server bigtime: | 22 Nov| 0.1 0.8| 0.0 0.0| 0.4 0.5| 1550.6 42.9| 1557.3 67.9| | 23 Nov| 0.3 1.0| 0.0 0.1| 0.4 0.6| 1331.8 37.3| 1337.2 46.3| | 24 Nov| 0.0 0.4| 0.0 0.0|

I recently set up an OpenBSD - Dovecot mail server for a client. Naturally (according to Murphy's Law) they want to use Outlook 2003, pop3s, and leave messages on the server. And just as naturally, the UIDLs don't seem to be working, and when they download mail, they get EVERY email stored on the server, not just the new ones. Other than switching them over to IMAP, I found the

Hello, I am a student. Now I need to know EXACTLY about How Samba Works. I have the source on samba-3.0.28a, but it's too many for me to read and understand 'cause I was a freshman. Is there a book/paper about the samba implementation or explain for source? Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ ÓÃÊÖ»úMSNÁÄÌìдÓʼþ¿´¿Õ¼ä£¬ÎÞÏÞ¹µÍ¨£¬·ÖÏí¾«²Ê£¡

Hello I am migrate FC1 to FC2, in FC1 i use ipop3d, but in the migration to FC2 this programa is obsolete, i decide migrate to dovecot, but i have problems with the old mail i have the mail stored into /var/spool/mail/USER and this error appears with examine the mail with Oulook Express: Jun 6 23:24:10 dakota pop3(dakota): open(/var/spool/mail/dakota.lock) failed: Permission denied Jun 6

Hi! I have just made the 0.9.0 release of PRNGD available. PRNGD is the Pseudo Random Number Generator Daemon. It has an EGD compatible interface and is designed to provide entropy on systems not having /dev/*random devices. Software supporting EGD style entropy requests are openssh, Apache/mod_ssl, Postfix/TLS... Automatic querying of EGD sockets at fixed locations has been introduced in the

Quoting Weiser, Johann (johann.weiser@siemens.com): > There is this really fancy sentence in the smb.conf man page: "It is > possible to use smbd in a hybrid mode where it is offers both user and > share level security under different NetBIOS aliases." > > There are a number of question here in this mailing list around this > sentence and the answers are usually to

I am installing Dovecot-2.1.13 on Slackware 13.37.0 for the first time to replace ipop3d and I have overcome all of the roadblocks as they have developed except this last one and I finally have to say ?uncle?. The error messages that are showing up in the dovecot.log are as follows. Jan 24 12:27:27 tux2 dovecot: auth: Error: passwd-file /etc/shadow: open(/etc/shadow) failed: Permission denied

I''ve got qualcomm''s qpopper2.2, and am not sure if its vulnerable. The advisory mentions pop and imap servers, but only says: version of IMAP (Section B). If your POP server is based on the University of Washington IMAP server code, you should also upgrade to the latest version of IMAP. Until you can take one of these actions, I installed the new imapd about 3

Hi! I'v installed dovecot over um-pop3 today. Dovecot has only pop3 enabled. imap will be enabled later. But there is one issue - on some accounts, after receiving mail to Outlook Express, mail is not deleted from /var/mail/username mbox file, and on most it is deleted. Why it works in that way? Best regards Krzysztof

Hi, I have a server configured as follows: a standard 2.4.18 kernel, IDE discs, 1Gb RAM (not all used), load avg around 1-2. a large partition, formatted reiserfs within large partition are 80 300Mb loopback file systems, formatted ext3. I got the following assertion yesterday which forced a lot of processes into D state. I'm not sure how easy it is to reproduce this problem.

Hi, We're upgrading a cluster of servers from v1.0.15 to v1.1.x or v1.2.x. It appears that the UIDL generation mechanism has changed, and thus we'll be getting POP3 dups with users that leave mail on server (which is a nasty practice, I know). From checking the sources, and performing a number of controlled tests in various scenarios, here is the outcome: upgrade from 1.0.15 to

Hi- A couple of comments regarding the POP3 server (I realize the POP3 server is probably low priority though..) One problem is that the "LAST" command is not supported. Some mail clients end up downloading all messages every time because of this (or so I'm told). The biggest source of these remarks is people using the yahoo webmail front end. I wonder if this could be added?

Hello, with samba-3.0.x an "smbcontrol smbd ping" was answered by all running smbd processes. With samba-3.2.x it is now *also* answered by nmbd and winbindd: [root@cs00 ~]# smbcontrol -V Version 3.2.5 [root@cs00 ~]# for i in `smbcontrol -t 1 winbindd ping | grep PONG | awk '{ print $4}'` ; do pstree -p | grep $i ; done winbindd(29908) - winbindd(29909) [root@cs00 ~]#

> The same can be said of closures, garbage collection and a dozen other > features that also cannot feasibly be added to LLVM. > > The only logical solution is to build a HLVM on top of LLVM and share that > between these high-level language implementations. This is an excellent point. You have convinced me. :-) BTW, what garbage collector are you using for your HLVM? You

Hi, is there an option in samba 4.1.x to have an smbd require SMB3 encrypted transport on share level? I can't seem to find anything like it. Thanks, -- Michael Weiser science + computing ag Senior Systems Engineer Geschaeftsstelle Duesseldorf Faehrstrasse 1 phone: +49 211 302 708 32 D-40221 Duesseldorf fax: +49 211 302 708 50

I have a big problem with our cluster, if i read my mail with POP3 client (and check the option, keep a copy on server), every time I read my mail, my client retrive ALL messages an the mailbox !!! I test this with: - Apple Mail 1.0 + 2.0 - M$ Outlook 2000 + 2003 - Thunderbird We use: - Dovecot RC1 - Postfix on Debian Sarge (stable) Can you know this bug ? Or have a workaround ? This function

Hello, Anyone have information on whether RedHat-5.0+ is affected by the recent (today's) CERT advisory regarding QPOP? thanks, -bp -- B. James Phillippe <bryan@terran.org> Linux Software Engineer, WGT Inc. http://earth.terran.org/~bryan