similar to: imap corrupted indexes

I'm running dovecot on an OpenBSD 3.7 server and after upgrading to RC25, the daemon started exiting with: Fatal: Time just moved backwards (1173221579 -> 1173221578)! This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll just kill myself now. After upgrading to RC26, I've gotten the error: Error: Time just moved backwards by 1 seconds. I'll sleep now until we're back in

http://dovecot.org/test/ Fixes: - Crashes in non-x86 64bit systems - Bugs in cache file header caching (you probably should delete all dovecot.index.cache files to be sure the bug won't haunt you in future) - FETCH ENVELOPE patch by Chris Wakelin (I'll try to figure out what to do with the list patch later) Known bugs left: - Thunderbird + maildir: moving lots of messages from

Hi, This may be a problem with my config file but I am finding that customers (and more importantly my boss) that are using outlook express when using test66/67 (upgraded from test60 + from address patch) are having message reappear after being fully deleted (not just marked) but are unreadable, sometimes blank headers appear too but again no message. Since it is affecting my boss he has told me

http://dovecot.org/test/ Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66 had and also some older problems reported in this list. It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks like it's stable.. BTW. mbox

I understand that the contents of /etc/sysctl.conf should be read and executed at system startup. However that never happens and I have to run sysctl -p after every reboot to get the settings I want. This is happening on every CentOS machine and VM I have. I can see in the startup scripts that "sysctl -e -p /etc/sysctl.conf >/dev/null 2>&1" is run at start up by the

After successfully updating three CentOS 6.3 VM guests to 6.4 I decided to update the host as well. And it failed to boot. Kernel panic - Not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Pid: 1, comm: init not tainted: 2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Plus a call trace I couldn't see Luckily I was able to boot from the previous kernel and get my system back up. After booting to the previous kernel I

This is a general invite to any/all Railers in the Seattle area who want to get together for beer/food. Nothing formal, just a "get to know ya" gathering. Details: Thursday, Oct 13 (next week), 7pm Bellevue Red Robin - *http://tinyurl.com/d678c* -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ D''Andrew "Dave" Thompson http://dathompson.blogspot.com

Timo, Attached is gdb information from core dumps related to the following assert in test-80: IMAP(username): file mbox-sync-update.c: line 442 (mbox_sync_update_header_from): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid == 0 || ctx->mail.uid_broken || ctx->mail.uid == mail->uid) My setup: Solaris 9, mbox format. test-80 compiled with gcc 4.0.1 using the following configure options: CC=gcc

http://dovecot.org/test/ I've still lots of mails in my INBOX and in this list that I should be looking into.. But here's a release that fixes at least some things. Maybe I'll make another one tomorrow.. Most importantly keyword code was changed a lot. It's now faster and less buggy. The keywords are also finally written into mbox, and keyword changes in the mbox are picked up.

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

I just switched to Mongrel, and it''s been working much better than my previous lighttpd/fastcgi setup. So thanks for the awesomeness. My current problem: once or twice an hour, I get following error in production Mongrel timed out this thread: too many open files I never get it in testing or on our staging server. Any ideas what would cause that? It doesn''t *appear*

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8993 If you''ve got feedback, requests for coverage, etc. please let me know. I''ll try to respond in an upcoming column. -- thanks, -pate ------------------------- http://on-ruby.blogspot.com

I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. _default/relationship123.com./IN: file not found If I change the zone defs to include the full path: >From zone "relationships123.com." IN { type master; file

Hi, I haven't been able to find any doco that explicity states whether it is supported, so I am hoping someone out there can answer the following questions: Is it possible for a folder/file in a samba share to have win2k security permissions assigned to it? For example, I want my samba server to participate in an existing Win2k domain. I want users to be able to set their own

On 06/07/2016 05:05 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" <lst_manage at webengineer.com> wrote: >> >> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all > cases firewall-config is not functional. >> >> First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on > one, it don't change to

On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: > > > Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.? I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations.? Still

I have two VMs, both with firewalld installed. One on machine It this in the IN_public chain: Chain IN_public (2 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 81 3423 IN_public_log all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 81 3423 IN_public_deny all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

Manning is running a contest: If you make the winning entry, you''ll win a $100 Manning Gift Certificate (hey, that''d be two copies of David''s awesome Ruby for Rails). the contest is to complete the phrase: Ruby is to Rails as ___________ is to __________________ The contest is at: http://www.manning.com/black/contest.php -- thanks, -pate

On 01/05/2016 02:00 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 05.01.2016 um 22:03 schrieb Emmett Culley: >> I am seeing these lines for each domain in the systemd journal: >> >> zone relationship123.com/IN: loading from master file relationship123.com.db failed: file not found >> zone relationship123.com/IN: not loaded due to errors. >> _default/relationship123.com./IN: