Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Index corruption"
2008 Sep 09
3
Splitting Data Frame into Two Based on Source Array
Dear all,
Suppose I have this data frame:
> data_main
V1 V2
foo 13.1
bar 12.0
qux 10.4
cho 20.33
pox 8.21
And I want to split the data into two parts
first part are the one contain in the source array:
> src
[1] "bar" "pox"
and the other one the complement.
In the end we hope to get this two dataframes:
> data_child1
V1 V2
bar 13.1
pox
2005 May 13
1
dovecot 1.0-test69 io hangs
I've been testing test69 with pop3 (under Linux and with mbox).
I began testing with a large inbox (11000 mails) and it seems the
communication between dovecot and the mailclient (evolution) stalls after
1000-2000 messages transferred.
I've looked in to the (non-trivial) io functionality of dovecot.
What I see is that io_loop_handler_run() in ioloop-poll.c does not
signal any more data
2005 May 13
1
problem with test69
Hi all, I noticed a problem with test69. I can recreate it with the
following steps:
- create a folder
- copy about 200 emails from INBOX to this folder
The copy succeeds, I can see with rawlog that it actually moves the 200 emails
around. I can see on the spool that there are 200 emails. This is maildir,
with spool over NFS.
Now I immediately select the new folder. I now see only a part of the
2002 Apr 09
0
couldn't find function "nclass.fd"
Dear list,
I get the following message while computing truehist in R 1.4.1 on
Redhat Linux 7.1:
> truehist(lsk$Pox, nbins = "FD" , prob = TRUE, xlab = "Pox [mmol/kg]")
Error in switch(casefold(nbins), scott = nclass.scott(data),
"freedman-diaconis" = , :
couldn't find function "nclass.fd"
Maybe the "nclass.fd" should be
2009 Jan 15
2
i386 hypervisor seeing only ~16G RAM, amd64 required?
Hi,
I have several machines using xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 from
etch-backports and they recently got upgraded to 20 or 24G RAM. I
have seen talk of a limit of a 16G RAM with 32bit PAE Xen and indeed
this is what I am seeing.
I am guessing there is still no way to get the 32bit hypervisor to
see more than 16G RAM, and I must go to 64bit.
Can I boot a 64bit hypervisor and still keep the same
2010 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] Endianness emulation
Hey folks,
If I've got some code that I can compile using clang, that depends
on a certain endianness, can I generate bitcode that will have the
code operate correctly, even if run on machines of the the opposite
endianness? If not, what're we talking about in specific work that'd
be needed?
Thanks,
- Lally
2006 Jan 03
1
64-bit CentOS 4.2
What exactly is different between the 32 and 64-bit version of CentOS
4.2? The kernel (drivers, file system, etc.) is probably compiled to
support 64-bit and probably glibc. What're some important differences
between the 32 and 64-bit version? I'm just trying to get a deeper
understanding.
Thanks in advance for any help.
FongVang
2007 Apr 13
2
R on Solaris 10 x64
Hi R Developers,
Greg is helping me with debugging R on Solaris 10 x64. Please let us
know if you have any thoughts or tips that can help us debug this.
Thanks,
David
************
Using default transfer plist
in vector_io: permuting
About to write
*** caught segfault ***
address e8554000, cause 'memory not mapped'
Traceback:
1: .External("do_hdf5save", call,
2008 Feb 27
4
Index corruption with squirrelmail.
Hi.
I don't know if the problem is related with squirrelmail or not, but I
started to have index corruption when I started to try squirrelmail.
Some informaton about my instalation:
dovecot 1.0.5-1 debian package with maildir
squirrelmail 1.4.9a-2 debian package
Some log information:
dovecot: 2008-02-27 08:39:39 Warning: IMAP(<please don't send spam to
me>): fscking index file
2006 Oct 24
1
Index corruption causes child process to die
My recent migration from Courier-IMAP to Dovecot has been marred by
these errors:
Oct 24 12:12:40 server dovecot: IMAP(juha): Fixed index file
~user/Maildir/.Geekzone/dovecot.index: first_recent_uid_lowwater 431
-> 430
Oct 24 12:12:40 server dovecot: IMAP(juha): Corrupted index file
~user/Maildir/.Geekzone/dovecot.index: Duplicate header extension
keywords
Oct 24 12:12:40 server dovecot: child
2018 Oct 10
0
index corruption weirdness
On 09.10.2018 22:16, William Taylor wrote:
> We have started seeing index corruption ever since we upgraded (we
> believe) our imap servers from SL6 to Centos 7. Mail/Indexes are stored
> on Netapps mounted via NFS. We have 2 lvs servers running surealived in
> dr/wlc, 2 directors and 6 backend imap/pop servers.
>
> Most of the core dumps I've looked at for different users
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
from smbstatus man page:
-B|--byterange
causes smbstatus to include byte range locks.
the fact is that 4 different connections are opening the same byte
range in 'MOVCTA.cdx'
That's about all that I can get from your command result dump.
On 2018-11-22 9:21 a.m., Jose Concha wrote:
> Using oplocks = no makes the communication extremely slow. For testing
>
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
Are the shares set to oplocks = no ? That sometimes has a role in
database corruption.
On 2018-11-22 6:31 a.m., Jose Concha via samba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been working with a xBase database (similar to dBase) in a multiuser
> application. There are like 40 users working on the database on the same
> time reading and like 10 writing information.
>
> Sometimes the
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
Thanks for the tip. Is veto oplocks different to oplocks = no?
Just now I run into an error, but this time I have this log:
../lib/util/util.c:401(fcntl_lock)
fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (resource temporally unavailable)
fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 2147483646 count 1 op 37 type 1 (resource
temporally unavailable)
Does this give you any clue of how the problem can be solved?
The
2003 Sep 19
2
Feature question/request
So I have a bunch of users who are roaming - IE no static IP address from all
over the internet. Some of them are able to use SMTP-AUTH which is great, but
for those that can't, a pop before smtp solution is in place using
relay-ctrl-age & cdb files via qmail.
Would it be desirable to have this feature in dovecot? I'd really like to
ditch qmail-pop3d, etc.
vpopmail has a
2005 May 03
2
index file corruption
Hello everyone. I am new to the list, so forgive me if this has been
discussed already.
My configuration is as follows:
Fedora Core 3, fully patched through yum through today.
Dovecot 0.9.9.13
Postfix 2.1.5
Using Maildir with Mail stored in ~/Maildir
My issue is that, for some odd reason the inbox file index gets
corrupt, There is no rhyme or reason as to why it happens or when, but
a
2005 Feb 21
0
index corruption with test62 on openbsd 3.6
i noticed this while browsing through my maillog..
Feb 21 11:27:43 selenium dovecot: IMAP(ben): Corrupted index cache file /u/home/ben/Maildir/.INBOX.ML-SunHELP.rescue/dovecot.index.cache: field index too large (3337 >= 22)
i have no problems reading that box after this, and see no other messages
about corrupt index files from today, or the past 14 days.
--ben
2006 Feb 13
1
Message index corruption when using Thunderbird and Dovecot
Hi all,
I have recently upgraded from UW-IMAP to Dovecot 1.0.beta3 on Redhat9. I
migrated my mailbox to from Mbox to Maildir using the mb2md perl script,
and created a procmail recipe file to get email arriving in the Maildir
directories. However, when accessing my mailbox from Thunderbird
(version 1.5), it occasionally mixes up the email header with the email
content. I also occasionally
2006 Apr 24
0
Solved problem with index corruption (new mail not seen)
Having had many problems in the past with IDLE not working, new
messages not being seen from Thunderbird, and sometimes garbage seen
as part of mailboxes, I eventually added some workaround/sanity check
patch to the imap_sync_deinit code to reread the offsets from the
index and that solved the problem.
Now with beta7 (I've previously used beta2), this seems not to be
necessary anymore. I
2014 Feb 19
0
Index corruption with 2.2.12 when moving a message
Just bumped into this today, when I upgraded to a testing package in
Fedora:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2672/dovecot-2.2.12-1.fc20
For details, see this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066709
Haven't seen this kind of thing before. Sure, it worked the second time
I tried to move the message to another folder (I'm guessing index got
rebuilt or