similar to: fcntl lock timout on maildir format Trash .index file under OpenBSD sparc64

Hi all, I have 2 CentOS 3.5 boxes & i do backups on the LAN Recently, I always get FTP timout error with large files "700 MB and more" . i tried to log and do manual backup with FTP command and i also got the same result "FTP timeout" i tried to google and i did # modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp but still get the same timeout message Any one can help??? Hameed

Hi, I installed LTSP and trying to boot diskless pc, but I got error PXE-E11 ARP timout. How did you get over it, I grab your mail from -- Maris Dembovskis Latvia, Valmiera, Gulbene Vidzeme - kur labas idejas dzimst ritdienai

Thank you very much. I had turned firewall OFF and it is working. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Knaddison" <greg.knaddison at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:17 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] FTP timout > > > On 8/24/05, Abd El-Hameed Ayad <hamid at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 Summary: Unexplained timout at end of file transfer. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ej.grace@imperial.ac.uk

When running Dragon NaturallySpeaking, I've started getting a timout error with the generic kernel. However, the realtime kernel seems to work. I have the feeling this is a problem that will eventually be solved in alsa or the kernel, but in the meantime I was wondering if there was any adjustment I could use to remove sound latency in wine. Any regedit tweaks, etc. Susan

I have 2 Centos servers that are currently giving me grief, I am getting the error:- SYSERR(root): timeout writing message to mail.server.co.uk Resource temporarily unavailable This is on both servers 1 is Centos 4.x & the second is:- sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 sendmail-cf-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 sendmail-devel-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6 Any clues ? Thanks Denis No virus found in this outgoing

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, Christian Schmidt wrote: > On 03.03.2016 09:55, Gordon Grubert wrote: >> On 03/03/2016 09:09 AM, Christian Schmidt wrote: >>> What about replicating the directory onto the dovecot host and send the >>> ldap queries to localhost? >> >> of course, this would be possible. E.g., for our DNS we are

Hello Christian, On 03/03/2016 09:09 AM, Christian Schmidt wrote: > Hello Gordon, > > On 29.02.2016 16:18, Gordon Grubert wrote: >> we are using a round robin dns record for connections to our ldap >> system. This works fine for almost all cases. In particular, for >> dovecot does this mean, when an ldap server is stopped, dovecot >> instantly reconnects to

Hi All, I'd just like to verify what the correct operation of the timeout parameter is for the dial application. I'm not sure if I've encountered a bug or a configuration issue. When a sip phone is not responding to invites on an outbound call, the dial application still waits the duration of timeout before continuing with dialplan execution. I was under the impression that app_dial

Hi Timo, On 01.03.2016 22:51, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 29 Feb 2016, at 17:18, Gordon Grubert <gordon.grubert+lists at uni-greifswald.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we are using a round robin dns record for connections to our ldap >> system. This works fine for almost all cases. In particular, for >> dovecot does this mean, when an ldap server is stopped,

Hi, we are using a round robin dns record for connections to our ldap system. This works fine for almost all cases. In particular, for dovecot does this mean, when an ldap server is stopped, dovecot instantly reconnects to another ldap server. But when the network connection to the active ldap server is broken, dovecot sticks to the failed ldap server. Is there any possibility to define a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 abartlet@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abartlet@samba.org Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | -------

TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-07-29 09:37:32 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - tinderbox 2.20 running on worker01.tb.des.no TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - FreeBSD worker01.tb.des.no 9.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon Jun 17 11:42:37 UTC 2013 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - starting RELENG_10 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2013-11-19 23:00:41 - cleaning the

TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:24 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-06-03 09:06:55 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_6/sparc64/sparc64/supfile TB ---

TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011 mdtancsa@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-04-08 08:26:29 - cleaning the

I am trying to build llvm on freebsd-8.0 on sparc64 CPU. I patched sources because 'sparc' enum value in include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h conflicts with gcc typedef 'sparc'. This allowed llvm itself to build successfully. But there is an error during gcc frontend compile: Did not get a target machine! Triplet is sparc64-unknown-freebsd8.0 I think this is because in many places, like in

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 19:08:27 -0500, Chris Ross wrote: > > Apologies first for using two addresses, but I can?t currently read my email at distal.com. :-) > > I was previously running dovecot2-2.2.29.1_2 on FreeBSD 11 on sparc64. > Trying to debug a problem I was having with one of my clients, I > upgraded to dovecot-2.2.33.2_4 on that same server. However, I

From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org> I've investigated the sparc stat() klibc problem a bit and found that the definition of 'struct stat' in klibc's include/arch/sparc64/archstat.h is (most probably) incorrect. I've written a simple test case using stat() function and then looked at preprocessed source, which includes the 'struct stat' definition (from glibc

We typically handle this by adding a "#undef sparc" in various places. For example see include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h which already has it. You'll probably need to add it to another header somewhere. -Chris On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Yuri wrote: > I am trying to build llvm on freebsd-8.0 on sparc64 CPU. > I patched sources because 'sparc' enum value in >