similar to: no password reply

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "no password reply"

2005 Apr 11
2
dovecot + postfix + active directory
hi list, I'm just curious if someone succesfully done dovecot authentication of Active directory and I will appreciage any link in this regards Thanks Askar
2014 Dec 26
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
Ok, thanks. I removed --inplace and --append-verify and kept --link-dest and --partial. And now the script works exactly as I want: hard-links are not updated, the script is still robust and can copy large files over unstable links etc, etc. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia
2014 Dec 27
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
I don't specify --partial-dir. As you can see from the script, rsync at first copies to "in-progress", and then renames this to (for example) 2014-12-01-000000. So, if rsync interrupts, then at the next run the script will end "in-progress" (all partial files will be done) and then will rename this dir to 2014-12-01-000000. So, there never will be partial files in finished
2014 Dec 27
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
No. Now there is no --inplace. So, rsync will never write new file directly into old one (without unlinking). If there already is old file and it needs updating, then rsync will write into something like .file-He4gw, and then it will rename this file to its right name. This new file will not have any hardlinks to old files == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia
2014 Dec 27
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
This is OK for me. I care about file contents, not metadata. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia
2014 Dec 26
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
>- --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when >- --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target system >must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or >timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the >window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the >possibility of incomplete or corrupt copies on
2004 Nov 23
2
ip rule to remove
hi thanks for your reply heh "Example: ip del rule pref 32742" is syntically wrong :) and when i tried "ip rule del 32742" it gives me error # ip rule del 32742 Error: argument "32742" is wrong: Failed to parse rule type so how to get get of these extra rules? 0: from all lookup local 32742: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup squid.out 32743: from all fwmark 0x2
2014 Dec 27
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
>BTW, if you want it to always have that behavior (it can save a lot of >backup space) you can use the old cp -al method instead of --link-dest >so that the target dir starts out completely populated. You mean making "cp -al" on the remote and then start rsync to newly created dir with --partial and without --link-dest, --inplace, --append-verify? What is benefits? Even metadata
2014 Dec 27
1
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
>I mean instead of having --link-dest=previous_backup and the target >being empty (or starting that way in your case) you cp -al the >prevous_backup to the new "incomplete" one. Now you have a tree full >of all hard links. Now you can rsync to the target without any >- --link-dest reference. I meant the same. >You are right about the other options except >that you
2014 Dec 26
2
--link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
Hi. This is bug report and simultaneously urgent asking for help. I am trying to write my rsync wrapper script, which will create minutely snapshots of my data using --link-dest. I want this script to be robust, it should work even if I do suspend/hibernate/reboot without notifying the script about this actions, it should work if I make hard-reset of the computer and if I disconnect network. Also
2020 Oct 08
2
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Hi Paula, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote: > Hey Andrzej, > > What are you seeing
2004 Nov 23
4
how to remove rules
hi I have trying to remove the extra rules from my routing tables, however with no luck Also I want to know these duplicate entries have an effect on packets going routed? I have this overwhelming rules lists from my predessor who added the "ip rule add fwmark" entries in firewall script, and on each run of firewall script its creates an extra entry in routing table. Now what I want to
2005 Apr 08
2
attr_names in test67
Hello, I'm wondering if the following situation is valid (though I think it isn't since I still cannot authenticate with ldap pass/userdb on test67 running on FreeBSD-5.3). Is it normal that the passdb_ldap_conn->attr_names second element (for instance) "turns to" "homeDirectory" as the following step by step gdb run sample shows ? : -- Breakpoint 1,
2006 May 19
3
compiz/zoom question
Hello all, I was wondering is it possible to add the input functionality to the zoom plugin? Currently zoom plugin is one of my favorite ones, I can open a terminal and still not increase font size but zoom on and READ it... ... because I'm not able to input anything to it, please correct me if I'm wrong; maybe it is already possible, but I still don't know how to do that... I'm
2020 Oct 08
3
[cfe-dev] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot
Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -
2005 May 13
2
tableview.sh
netfilter and lartc members I just thought it''s time I contribute. I created this little script to help me while setting up iptables rules for firewalling, shaping or both. I hope this helps someone. Called tableview.sh, inspired by Table Mountain, Cape Town, ZA :) --- SOF ---- #!/bin/sh # ____ # /\/ \/\ # /__________\ # # Simple loop for keeping track of what is happening in
2005 Jan 31
3
load balancing between two default gateways
Hi list gurus, long story short we have firewall machine which is the default gateway for our clients and firewall send traffic out to Internet via cisco router. On cisco we have two serial interfaces 1Mb and 2Mb. On firewall #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 2mb) #route add default gw xxx.xxx.xx.xxx (for 1mb) and the same rule for Imb link route packets via these two links. However I
2013 Oct 18
2
patch for ssl_prefer_server_ciphers in dovecot 2.1
Dear all, I tried to do a backport of 'ssl_prefer_server_ciphers' (http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/897484f45a87/) to Dovecot 2.1 (namely the Debian version of Dovecot) and wanted to ask if there is any chance to integrate this feature into Dovecot 2.1 'upstream' as well. As the code structure changed quite a bit, I am not sure if my patch is complete. I tested it with pop3s
2010 Apr 20
7
Xen 4.0 - No console prompt after booting domU but functional SSH
Hello xen-users ! I am coming for help concerning the just released 4.0 version. Install has worked rather well on my Debian Lenny. I have just had a few bugs for which I have found the answer looking around on this list. I have created a Debian Lenny domU which boots up just fine. The only problem is that I am unable to get a console prompt when using "xm console nameofdomU". I do see
2015 May 07
4
smbstatus -- protocol and feature information
Hi Jeremy, > > Do you think requesting this as a feature for smbstatus in the Samba bug > > tracker does make sense? > > Yes please. We certainly need a 'protocol' field somewhere > in the smbstatus output I think. done. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11262 -- Adi