similar to: Linux, Maildir over NFS, Locking problems

hi all, i've just installed dovecot from debian sarge and i get this error: Jun 28 16:31:50 server pop3(user): file_wait_lock() failed with custom flags file /mnt/nfs/users/user//mail/.customflags: No locks available (maildir in nfs) how seriously i should take it ? is it fixed in newer versions ? thanks !

I'm working on getting Dovecot set up on my school's mailserver, as an IMAP and POP server. Everything is going well, move over to maildir went well, and all that... The catch: When I coverted from mbox to maildir (as part of this whole process), I put the Maildir folders under user home dirs -- and the home dirs are mounted via NFS from a server. This is for reasons of space as well as

Dear R list, I've just installed R and then followed the instructions to install the package "geoR" from within R by using the following line of code: install.packages("geoR", contriburl = "http://www.est.ufpr.br/geoR/windows") This installed okay under the folder C:\documents and settings\ ... But when I follow the instructions in the illustrative session

I'm getting this error for al my users does anybody know wat the problem is and how i can fix it pop3(bas at giskit.nl): Mar 06 09:10:37 Error: file_wait_lock() failed with index file /mailstore/vmail/giskit.nl/bas/.INBOX/.imap.index: No locks available Met vriendelijk groet, Bas van Dikkenberg GISkit bv BFVD1-RIPE Tel: +3130-6340430 Fax:

Hi, I'm using version 0.99.10.8 on debian 2.4.26 and am getting this problem, can someone please shed some light over this? Aug 31 13:58:58 xxx imap(someone): file_wait_lock() failed with modify log file /var/mail/someone_new/Maildir/.INBOX/.imap.index.log: Resource temporarily unavailable and then: Aug 31 14:00:58 xxx imap(someone): Couldn't lock modify log file

/etc/postfix/main.cf.default: mailbox_delivery_lock = flock, dotlock Is flock equivalent to dovecot's fnctl locking? For mbox what type of locking settings should I be using? (No NFS, only local filesystem.) Warren Togami warren at togami.com

Hello - I know I am not the only one that will be trying, or has tried this before. Here are my questions! NFS Clients, multiple servers running dovecot - linux with 2.6 kernel with relevant patches (utime, etc) Backend - netapp filer End users - various clients all running IMAP It looks like 1.0.beta8 is definately the way to go. I have a few questions with regards to setup. Is it now

Hi everyone, I have noticed recently that Dovecot creates lock directories under users' Maildirs which look like IMAP folders. This is bad since users will see IMAP folders that are not supposed to be there. In my logs I see dovecot: imap(...): Error: file_create_locked(/.../Maildir/.vsize.lock) failed: Is a directory The directory in question # ls /.../Maildir/.vsize.lock/ cur/

Incidentally, if you're actually aiming to match different forms of a name (Peter vs Pete, Ann vs Anne vs Annette) then you might find the synonym feature a better option than wildcarding. You'd need to give it a list of names to treat as synonyms, but it should have many fewer false positives, and can also handle cases which aren't just a substring - e.g. Robert vs Rob vs Bob vs

Backtrace:/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB

I'm just dumping all I got in here, after initial feedback we can see how to organize todo's around it. tl;dr: * Does not upgrade cleanly from 4.8 packages, so we have to prevent this from entering testing until we fix that. * Live migration is broken, explodes with memory allocation errors. ---- >8 ---- 1. Build packages * I have built salsa/master using pbuilder targeting sid.

I have had great luck in the last couple of months getting llvm to do cool stuff with directly linked modules using llvm-as and llvm-ld. Now, I would like to get some of the same functionality working through an ExecutionEngine; however, I am having trouble making functions call across module boundaries. I know from previous discussions on this list that what I am attempting should be easy. I

Hi, I did some experiments with dovecot on a glusterfs on the active nodes without a director. So I had concurrent access to the files. With the help of the available documentation about NFS and fcntl locks I managed to find out the following: With the plain mbox format dovecot seems to apply and to honor the fcntl locks. But since this format is not used any more in real setups, it is

Hi I'm currently debugging some replication issues between two dovecot 2.3.9.2 servers, where one is live and the other is just a copy used for backup with no imap user access. After initial alignment (with various error messages such as the stalled io messages a fnctl lock messages) I am seeing replication miss messages or stop altogether on mailboxes, even with no further error messages.

Am Dienstag, 13. Januar 2015, 21:40:34 schrieb Nick Edwards: > On 1/13/15, Michael Schwartzkopff <ms at sys4.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I did some experiments with dovecot on a glusterfs on the active nodes > > without > > a director. So I had concurrent access to the files. > > > > With the help of the available documentation about NFS and

Hello. I would like to know if promise RAID cards are compatible with CentOS / RHEL ? I have seen that only SATA is supported on the RHEL hardware compatibility list. The other ATA raid cards seems not to be compatible. They give source code and promise grants compatibility with RedHat 8 and 9 but not RHEL. I would like to know if somebody tried a ATA raid card like Fasttrack TX2000, SX4000,

Dovecot's transactions often write-lock dovecot.index.log twice (without unlocking in between), and then unlock it twice. Is that intended, or is that a bug? If I read the man pages correctly, double write-locking is pointless but safe. But double unlocking could cause data corruption during the period between the first and second unlocks, because the locks don't nest (are not

There seems to be a result type difference when subscripting a 6 x 1 matrix as compared to a 3 x 2 matrix that is caused by the ncol = 1 compared to ncol > 1. > ThinMatrix <- matrix(1:6,ncol=1) > ThinMatrix [,1] [1,] 1 [2,] 2 [3,] 3 [4,] 4 [5,] 5 [6,] 6 > FatMatrix <- matrix(1:6,ncol=2) > FatMatrix [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 4 [2,] 2 5

Hi list, as I know from the README in the source files OCFS2 does not support cluster aware flock. Our web developers have to use the php flock() function. There is a second method how php can handle locking - via the fnctl() function. Will this be supportet? I assume that OCFS2 supports the c-function open() mit O_CREATE as well as O_EXCL. Am I right? Regards, Stephan

Guest needs the ability to enable and disable MSI-X interrupts by setting the MSI-X control bit, for a passed-through device. Guest is allowed to write MSI-X mask bit only if Xen *thinks* that mask is clear (interrupts enabled). If the mask is set by Xen (interrupts disabled), writes to mask bit by the guest is ignored. Currently, a write to MSI-X mask bit by the guest is silently ignored. A