Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "ldap auth with test66"
2005 Mar 30
2
test65 killed by SIGSEV
Hi,
I had successfully set up dovecot-1.0-test62 + ldap pass/user db, but
now I'm encoutering a SIGSEV problem with a similar set up of a brand
new dovecot-1.0-test65 installation.
The auth process is killed by a SIGSEV as reported in the error log file :
dovecot: Mar 30 17:06:59 Error: child 28291 (auth) killed with signal 11
To be precise, the problem occurs in the
2005 Apr 12
1
test67 ldap_connection
Hello,
I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication
against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine.
[ The problem is the same as previously described in this list :
- FreeBSD-5.3
- dovecot-1.0-test67
- openldap-2.1.27
--> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply"
--> "NO Temporary authentication failure."
or
--
2005 Apr 08
2
attr_names in test67
Hello,
I'm wondering if the following situation is valid (though I think it
isn't since I still cannot authenticate with ldap pass/userdb on
test67 running on FreeBSD-5.3).
Is it normal that the passdb_ldap_conn->attr_names second element (for
instance) "turns to" "homeDirectory" as the following step by step gdb
run sample shows ? :
--
Breakpoint 1,
2005 Sep 20
1
auth protocol, buffers
Hello Timo,
I'm curious about 2 points (I'm using alpha2 but these are general
questions) :
Background :
. I connect to dovecot-1.0.alpha2 through thunderbird
. I use ldap pass/userdb and PLAIN mech
. I've only got one auth block in dovecot.conf (all pass/userdb/mech
except ldap/PLAIN are commented)
1) I notice that, for one thunderbird connection trial, imap-login
2005 Jul 20
1
CR LF in stable
Hello,
It seems that mbox format mailboxes holding \r\n (CR + LF) character
sequences (instead of \n only) still cause assertion failures when
moving messages from one folder to another.
--
dovecot: Jul 19 17:14:52 Error: IMAP(dovetest): file istream-raw-mbox.c: line 38
3 (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size): assertion failed: (rstream->body_offset != (
uoff_t)-1)
--
I seems to work in -test78
2005 Apr 05
0
FETCH order fix backport to stable from test66
I've had a go at back-porting Timo's recent fixes to the IMAP fetch
command from 1.0-test66 to 1.0-stable.
This seems to fix the problem with kmail, and Thunderbird seems to
work fine without its RFC822.SIZE fix.
It's a bit big for the body of this message, so it's attached.
The bit I'm most concerned about in my port is whether I got the
buffer_insert call right
2005 Apr 18
1
password_verify in test67 with ldap
Hello Timo,
your patch introducing pass_attr_names and user_attr_names fixed the
problem of the 'shared' attr_names member of [passdb|userdb]_ldap_conn
as I answered in the relative thread.
Now I think there is a problem while comparing user-provided and
ldap-provided passwords causing a false 'password mismatch' situation,
while using PLAIN mechanism with LDAP authentication.
2004 Dec 13
0
1.0-test57 LDAP dovecot-auth SIGABRT
Hi,
I'm experiencing the following problem when runnig dovecot-1.0-test
set up to authenticate users against openldap, while the corresponding
setup with dovecot-0.99.11 works fine :
. my platform : FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p1
. dovecot version : dovecot-1.0-test57
. openldap version : openldap-2.1.27
- Description :
When I talk IMAP to the dovecot server, I can connect on port 143 and
2008 Mar 18
0
Major issues with ActiveRecord callbacks in BackgroundRb r324
Hi there
I''ve been running BackgroundRb in production for a few months now. Recently
we added encryption onto some of our ActiveRecord fields by hooking in the
before_save and after_save callbacks, like:
class MyCallback
def initialize(attr_names)
@attr_names = attr_names
end
def before_save(model)
@attr_names.each do |attr_name|
next if
2005 Apr 02
4
1.0-test66
http://dovecot.org/test/
I've still lots of mails in my INBOX and in this list that I should be
looking into.. But here's a release that fixes at least some things.
Maybe I'll make another one tomorrow..
Most importantly keyword code was changed a lot. It's now faster and
less buggy. The keywords are also finally written into mbox, and keyword
changes in the mbox are picked up.
2006 Apr 12
0
Netmask validator
Sharing the wealth. I just finished working on a custom netmask
validator and thought others might benefit. Of course, comments and
suggestions are welcome.
def validates_netmask(*attr_names)
configuration = { :only_numbers => ''must only use numbers as octet values'',
:range => ''has one or more octet values that are > 255'',
2006 May 18
1
Introspection of validates_presence_of
Hello all.
I don''t know how to get all symbols passed to method
validates_presence_of in model. I''ve trying to use following solution:
class News < ActiveRecord::Base
validates_presence_of :title, :text
def validates_presence_of(*attr_names)
@@obligatory_fields = attr_names
ActiveRecord::Base.validates_presence_of(*attr_names)
end
def obligatory_fields
2018 Dec 04
3
Dovecot 2.3.4 crash
A full example with dovecot debug symbols activated (note since I have activate valgrind, no more segfault it?s normal I presume ):
Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3071== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3053== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3057== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot:
2009 Jan 30
3
Shared subscription, acl-list and uidvalidity(s)
Hello,
I'm running dovecot-1.1.8/Maildir/ACL plugin. I sucessfully set up a Maildir
shared between users of the unix group 'doveshared' via a public namespace,
unix permissions and ACL files.
The location of my public namespace is /path/to/public.
I tried 2 sub-setups :
First setup
----------
drwxrws--- 4 root doveshared 4096 Jan 30 13:39 public
-rw-r----- 1 root doveshared
2018 Dec 04
0
Dovecot 2.3.4 crash
Hi !
Yes it happens every 2 to 5 minutes so no problem in reproducing.
I made the change with valgrind, I have now this in my log :
Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2436== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2393== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2476== Invalid read of size 8
Dec 4 12:00:27
2006 Apr 27
1
sigsev with postfix + dovecot SASL
hi,
I am just playing a bit with the dovecot SASL plugin for postfix and so far my
tests have been very successfull, can't wait to get the cyrus-sasl beast replaced.
However, I found a potential problem when doing some "illegal" stuff on the
postfix side:
-------CUT-------
cerberus:/var/log# telnet smtptest 25
Trying 192.168.99.99...
Connected to smtptest.bestsolution.at.
Escape
2005 Jun 27
3
imap corrupted indexes
I've searched the archives and find a lot of references to corrupted indexes
but can't seem to find any solutions. It seems like folks either have the
problem or they don't.
We recently migrated from a RedHat Linux server to an OpenBSD 3.7 server (both
using dovecot). Imap was working flawlessly on the RedHat box but now gives
numerous index errors. I then upgraded to
2020 Jun 19
8
[Bug 3183] New: sigsev
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3183
Bug ID: 3183
Summary: sigsev
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.3p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
Reporter: uhlik at
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] DataFlowSanitizer using wrong memory layout
Hi all,
Any one tried using DataFlowSanitizer on Linux x86_64?
I tried on:
3.13.0-44-generic #73~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 17 00:39:15 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
It assumes wrong memory layout and remaps application code segment as shadow memory, thus causing SIGSEV (Segmentation fault).
Is this know? and fix under way?
-Thanks,
Aravind
-------------- next part
2005 Apr 08
2
1.0-test67
http://dovecot.org/test/
Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66
had and also some older problems reported in this list.
It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several
problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it
a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks
like it's stable..
BTW. mbox