similar to: ldap auth with test66

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "ldap auth with test66"

2005 Mar 30
2
test65 killed by SIGSEV
Hi, I had successfully set up dovecot-1.0-test62 + ldap pass/user db, but now I'm encoutering a SIGSEV problem with a similar set up of a brand new dovecot-1.0-test65 installation. The auth process is killed by a SIGSEV as reported in the error log file : dovecot: Mar 30 17:06:59 Error: child 28291 (auth) killed with signal 11 To be precise, the problem occurs in the
2005 Apr 12
1
test67 ldap_connection
Hello, I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine. [ The problem is the same as previously described in this list : - FreeBSD-5.3 - dovecot-1.0-test67 - openldap-2.1.27 --> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply" --> "NO Temporary authentication failure." or --
2005 Apr 08
2
attr_names in test67
Hello, I'm wondering if the following situation is valid (though I think it isn't since I still cannot authenticate with ldap pass/userdb on test67 running on FreeBSD-5.3). Is it normal that the passdb_ldap_conn->attr_names second element (for instance) "turns to" "homeDirectory" as the following step by step gdb run sample shows ? : -- Breakpoint 1,
2005 Sep 20
1
auth protocol, buffers
Hello Timo, I'm curious about 2 points (I'm using alpha2 but these are general questions) : Background : . I connect to dovecot-1.0.alpha2 through thunderbird . I use ldap pass/userdb and PLAIN mech . I've only got one auth block in dovecot.conf (all pass/userdb/mech except ldap/PLAIN are commented) 1) I notice that, for one thunderbird connection trial, imap-login
2005 Jul 20
1
CR LF in stable
Hello, It seems that mbox format mailboxes holding \r\n (CR + LF) character sequences (instead of \n only) still cause assertion failures when moving messages from one folder to another. -- dovecot: Jul 19 17:14:52 Error: IMAP(dovetest): file istream-raw-mbox.c: line 38 3 (istream_raw_mbox_get_body_size): assertion failed: (rstream->body_offset != ( uoff_t)-1) -- I seems to work in -test78
2005 Apr 05
0
FETCH order fix backport to stable from test66
I've had a go at back-porting Timo's recent fixes to the IMAP fetch command from 1.0-test66 to 1.0-stable. This seems to fix the problem with kmail, and Thunderbird seems to work fine without its RFC822.SIZE fix. It's a bit big for the body of this message, so it's attached. The bit I'm most concerned about in my port is whether I got the buffer_insert call right
2005 Apr 18
1
password_verify in test67 with ldap
Hello Timo, your patch introducing pass_attr_names and user_attr_names fixed the problem of the 'shared' attr_names member of [passdb|userdb]_ldap_conn as I answered in the relative thread. Now I think there is a problem while comparing user-provided and ldap-provided passwords causing a false 'password mismatch' situation, while using PLAIN mechanism with LDAP authentication.
2004 Dec 13
0
1.0-test57 LDAP dovecot-auth SIGABRT
Hi, I'm experiencing the following problem when runnig dovecot-1.0-test set up to authenticate users against openldap, while the corresponding setup with dovecot-0.99.11 works fine : . my platform : FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p1 . dovecot version : dovecot-1.0-test57 . openldap version : openldap-2.1.27 - Description : When I talk IMAP to the dovecot server, I can connect on port 143 and
2008 Mar 18
0
Major issues with ActiveRecord callbacks in BackgroundRb r324
Hi there I''ve been running BackgroundRb in production for a few months now. Recently we added encryption onto some of our ActiveRecord fields by hooking in the before_save and after_save callbacks, like: class MyCallback def initialize(attr_names) @attr_names = attr_names end def before_save(model) @attr_names.each do |attr_name| next if
2005 Apr 02
4
1.0-test66
http://dovecot.org/test/ I've still lots of mails in my INBOX and in this list that I should be looking into.. But here's a release that fixes at least some things. Maybe I'll make another one tomorrow.. Most importantly keyword code was changed a lot. It's now faster and less buggy. The keywords are also finally written into mbox, and keyword changes in the mbox are picked up.
2006 Apr 12
0
Netmask validator
Sharing the wealth. I just finished working on a custom netmask validator and thought others might benefit. Of course, comments and suggestions are welcome. def validates_netmask(*attr_names) configuration = { :only_numbers => ''must only use numbers as octet values'', :range => ''has one or more octet values that are > 255'',
2006 May 18
1
Introspection of validates_presence_of
Hello all. I don''t know how to get all symbols passed to method validates_presence_of in model. I''ve trying to use following solution: class News < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :title, :text def validates_presence_of(*attr_names) @@obligatory_fields = attr_names ActiveRecord::Base.validates_presence_of(*attr_names) end def obligatory_fields
2018 Dec 04
3
Dovecot 2.3.4 crash
A full example with dovecot debug symbols activated (note since I have activate valgrind, no more segfault it?s normal I presume ): Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3071== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3053== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==3057== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:09:40 dovecot:
2009 Jan 30
3
Shared subscription, acl-list and uidvalidity(s)
Hello, I'm running dovecot-1.1.8/Maildir/ACL plugin. I sucessfully set up a Maildir shared between users of the unix group 'doveshared' via a public namespace, unix permissions and ACL files. The location of my public namespace is /path/to/public. I tried 2 sub-setups : First setup ---------- drwxrws--- 4 root doveshared 4096 Jan 30 13:39 public -rw-r----- 1 root doveshared
2018 Dec 04
0
Dovecot 2.3.4 crash
Hi ! Yes it happens every 2 to 5 minutes so no problem in reproducing. I made the change with valgrind, I have now this in my log : Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2436== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2393== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:00:27 xxxxx dovecot: auth-worker: Error: ==2476== Invalid read of size 8 Dec 4 12:00:27
2006 Apr 27
1
sigsev with postfix + dovecot SASL
hi, I am just playing a bit with the dovecot SASL plugin for postfix and so far my tests have been very successfull, can't wait to get the cyrus-sasl beast replaced. However, I found a potential problem when doing some "illegal" stuff on the postfix side: -------CUT------- cerberus:/var/log# telnet smtptest 25 Trying 192.168.99.99... Connected to smtptest.bestsolution.at. Escape
2005 Jun 27
3
imap corrupted indexes
I've searched the archives and find a lot of references to corrupted indexes but can't seem to find any solutions. It seems like folks either have the problem or they don't. We recently migrated from a RedHat Linux server to an OpenBSD 3.7 server (both using dovecot). Imap was working flawlessly on the RedHat box but now gives numerous index errors. I then upgraded to
2020 Jun 19
8
[Bug 3183] New: sigsev
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3183 Bug ID: 3183 Summary: sigsev Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: uhlik at
2015 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] DataFlowSanitizer using wrong memory layout
Hi all, Any one tried using DataFlowSanitizer on Linux x86_64? I tried on: 3.13.0-44-generic #73~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 17 00:39:15 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux It assumes wrong memory layout and remaps application code segment as shadow memory, thus causing SIGSEV (Segmentation fault). Is this know? and fix under way? -Thanks, Aravind -------------- next part
2005 Apr 08
2
1.0-test67
http://dovecot.org/test/ Hopefully better release than last one. Fixes several problems test66 had and also some older problems reported in this list. It also contains a pretty large mbox code cleanup, fixing several problems (especially related to X-IMAP/X-IMAPbase headers) and making it a bit faster. Maybe I'll backport it to 1.0-stable too when it looks like it's stable.. BTW. mbox