similar to: error

Greetings All, I am a Postfix/Courier-IMAP user and am interested in Dovecot. I have install Dovecot via FBSD ports. I have got to the part where I can telnet in to the server. -bash-2.05b$ telnet 192.168.1.61 143 Trying 192.168.1.61... Connected to 192.168.1.61. Escape character is '^]'. * OK dovecot ready. x login pete testing * BAD [ALERT] Plaintext authentication is disabled, but

I am new to dovecot administration. I?ve read the Wiki but that hasn?t given me the understanding I need. When I query my LDAP (on macOS) on a value for user ?gerben?, I can get that: dumbledore:~ gerben$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 -read /users/gerben GeneratedUID GeneratedUID: 780D870E-6B00-478E-AB70-3D3307215A82 I would like to use that value in dovecot settings, e.g. something like user_attrs =

Suppose my mail_location is: mail_location = maildir:/private/var/mail/nl.rna.mail/%u But I would like to use a simple lookup table to replace %u with another value, say '8DB4E345-9144-4F92-8C9F-9D47BB61CBF8? instead of ?username?. Is there a (simple) way to do this? Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <http://enterprisechess.com/> Mastering ArchiMate

> Then I could call that method when I'm processing compiler generated stubs > that have inline > assembly. Sorry, I just think this is a way too slippery slope to be in. People already misunderstand and misuse hasRawTextSupport. Adding the ability to for llvm to know if an inline assembly is human written or machine generated would be a massive foot gun. Cheers, Rafael

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest? > Slippery slope? What's the next step? Can it get committed? > Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how > Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message? As a new subscriber, I guess my

I did something similar for dominators, for GVN, etc. All see significant speedups. However, the answer i got back when i mentioned this was "things like ptrset and densemap should only have a small performance difference from side data when used and sized right", and i've found this to mostly be true after looking harder. In the case you are looking at, i see: -

On Dec 2, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Carl-Philip Hänsch wrote: > While trying to find a solution for this bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11235 , > I came to the conclusion that the following things can happen while optimizing: > - after gvn, I get new constants which are inserted into br and add/sum/..., so there should be at least one more jump-threading and/or instsimplify > -

Hey all. Ok, so I'll stand up and be counted a newbie in this list too (just did the same for the General discussion list). I (once again) read through the archives, especially the ones concerning the comment field. First, I'm not a developer, per se. I'm merely an anal-retentive power user of such things, who likes to have my music archived, and sorted. In reading through the

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker at gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz via llvm-dev > >>

I am migrating an old dovecot 2.2.30 (macOS High SIerra, macO S Server) to a new server with dovecot 2.3.7 (macOS Mojave, macports). To get the data over, I?m trying to do a reverse backup with doveadm between an old and a new mail server, but failing to do so. I?m trying (from the new server, the old server is 192.168.2.67): doveadm -Dv \ -o imapc_host=192.168.2.67 \ -o imapc_user=gerben \

On 13/07/2023 16:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.07.23 um 16:41 schrieb Sean Paul: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig >> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>> hello Sean, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>> I'd really prefer this patch

On 13/07/2023 16:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.07.23 um 16:41 schrieb Sean Paul: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig >> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>> hello Sean, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>> I'd really prefer this patch

Hi, Fragmentation of the bots is not ideal. While I totally understand Eric's reasoning for doing so, and am delighted to see another Windows bot helping to ensure quality code, I think this is a bit of a slippery slope. We already have the main Buildbots, Green Dragon, Chapuni's Bots, a myriad of private bots and now this new bot. I don't think it is reasonable to ask people to

While you can go the route of changing master to main or something similar, you're up for a circlejerk you can not win. If you change technically established terms each time someone gets offended, this will never end. As a comparison, when studying in europe, you do your Master-Degree. In Germany, when you finish your apprenticeship as carpenter and do the next level, to actually lead with

I've been having problems with Pine 4.62 talking to Dovecot 1.0 stable. It's fine when the folder collection path is empty, but if I have "~/mail/" or "mail/" it gives access errors (I'm using the "~/mail/", "mail/" etc. hidden namespaces for backwards compatability). It seems to me that Dovecot is not replying correctly to a "LIST"

I am new to dovecot administration, not new to postfix administration. When setting up a new postfix/dovecot combo from scratch, can I start with dovecot alone and still be able to test it? E.g. can I address the local delivery agent with some sort of test email? If so, how? I haven?t been able to find it in the wiki. Gerben Wierda Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture

Nobody? > On 10 Sep 2019, at 11:58, Gerben Wierda via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > I am new to dovecot administration. I?ve read the Wiki but that hasn?t given me the understanding I need. > > When I query my LDAP (on macOS) on a value for user ?gerben?, I can get that: > > dumbledore:~ gerben$ dscl /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1 -read /users/gerben GeneratedUID

My new dovecot covers spam/ham training through the standard Spam_train and Notspam_train mailboxes. When a message is copied (I?m using macOS/iOS standard Apple clients) it triggers the spam/ham learning by rspamd. So far so good. When I move a message to Spam_train I?d like it to be removed immediately after learning. When I move a message to Notspam_train, I?d like it to move back where it

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker at

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The difference between Analysis and Transforms is *not* about passes, but >> about what