similar to: more info on apple mail vs dovecot 0.99

hello all, first off, a success story. after much testing and preperation, we've switched from uw-imap to dovecot. i am not kidding when i say that we have experienced an order of magnitude decrease in server load (previously load peaks were 40-60, now they are 3-4). so, suffice to say that the mail admins here are very happy :) one problem that has come up though is particular to

Hello, I just decided to try dovecot again after a long pause, and I must say that I am very impressed with the speed and resource usage, even when running with UNIX mailboxes. However, I have a problem with SSL. Every two minutes the connection is frozen, and the client has to reconnect after it times out waiting for a response from the server. My IMAP client fetches all headers, and then

it seems that when you say "check for new mail" in apple mail, it sends a NOOP to the imap server to get the response. in uw, the conversation is something like: 25 NOOP 25 OK NOOP completed 26 NOOP * 2796 EXISTS * 7 RECENT 26 OK NOOP completed however, with dovecot, if it has already notified the client that new mail has arrived, it will look something like: * 24 EXISTS * 2 RECENT

hi list, i'm in the process of testing dovecot before a hopeful switchover from uw-imap/qpopper to dovecot, primarily to get off of the uw-imap/mbox combo and moved to Maildir. i think we've worked out the logistics to avoid any service downtime, with only a short window of a few minutes per user for when we convert from mbox to maildir format. however, during testing a few issues have

I have recently gotten Dovecot running on my Solaris 5.8 mail server in order to replace UW IMAP. I'm currently testing it out with mail clients popular amongst my users. It's been working very well, with one vital exception. Apple Mail on OS X 10.4 is not completing authentication (I don't think it's even getting that far). All I'm seeing in the syslog for attempts with

Am 13.01.2006 um 11:17 Uhr +0000 schrieb Michael Stevens: >I can read a mail, see Apple Mail flag it as read, quit, come back >later, and find the mail is marked unread again. It seems to also >happen sometimes when I switch folders or get new mail. > >I've not worked out what's triggering it yet. Anyone seen anything >like this? Same here - Eudora on MacOS 10.4, and

Hi All! I am interested in testing whether the means for the data I am investigating are equal to a specific value - let's say 0.01. I have already run a one-way ANOVA and know that the differences in the means are not significant, so now I want to know what values the means take on. "otestme" is the data I am working with (it would be hard for me to get into a form that would be

On 12/12/2012 10:18 AM, Nadav Rotem wrote: > I run the test suite by CD-ing into /projects/test-suite and running "make TEST=simple -j 4". > > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to run test-suite for x86 in order to verify a target independent patch before I put it back. >> The patch has been

Forgive me if I've been asleep at the switch on the SSL problem and it's already been figured out, but....could this be what the prob is? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Pine-info] "incomplete SecBuffer exceeds maximum buffer size" ? Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:47:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Hubert <hubert at washington.edu> Organization: Univ of

I am migrating from UW to dovecot and using mbox. I have been able to find mbox to maildir migration information and tools; however, I have had little luck finding any tool or information for performing such a migration where I wish to keep mbox. ( I know I should migrate to MailDir, but in the case I wish to take baby steps.) I have setup dovecot pop3 communication and I go to my email client

Hi, we recently switched from Imap-Uw to Dovecot as a pop3 server. I was wondering why people who have the flag 'Leave messages on server' in their email client (Outlook, Outlook Expres) that they receive duplicates of their stored mail? Is it because Dovecot doesn't know that the messages has already been popped by Imap Uw or is the email client which thinks there are new messages

Hi, We are using mbox and UW IMAP, and are having issues because UW IMAP does not support multiple client access when you use NFS for the mail files. I've done some research (see the comments after my 2 questions below), and most of the other major IMAP servers simply don't support it (courier is about the only one that has a positive comment). How much testing have you done

I have several mail accounts, but collect all spam e-mail in the spam mailbox on one of them. After switching to dovecot (from imap-uw) I notice a very slow speed of bulk transfers and a very high CPU utilization by the dovecot's imap process during it -- sustained 62% of my server's Pentium2 @266MHz. Never saw such effects under imap-uw... My client is KMail (despite the awfull quality

Hi All, I have migrated from uw-imap to Dovecot for POP3 & IMAP service. I run webmail using squirrelmail. When running uw-imap I used to run up.imapproxyd on the webmail server for faster responses. After migrating to Dovecot, I find that up.imapproxyd does not work well with dovecot. I tried to use dovecot as IMAP PRoxy server as per the document

Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape

http://dovecot.org/test/ Again only mbox fixes. I found some more bugs which could have also caused some of the mbox problems that people reported. They were found when I today thought I'd again do a bit of testing with my favourite 1.4GB mbox. Then I thought I might as well see how it compares against UW-IMAP. First a bit of explanations how they work internally: Dovecot 1.0-test24

Hello, Over the last 12 hours or so, I've been wrestling with a mysterious dovecot issue. After upgrading a mail server I'm helping my friend with maintaining from Fedora Core1 to Fedora Core4, I realized that I couldn't use UW-IMAP4 anymore (well, I can compile it myself, but it turned out that UW-IMAP was the main cause of the server's having load average as high as 30 from

Bedankt voor uw bericht. Online4You is sinds 1 augustus niet meer operationeel. Per e-mail hebben wij u geinformeerd over de omstandigheden en uw opties. Helaas kunnen wij u niet meer helpen, uw mail wordt niet doorgestuurd en/of beantwoord. Indien uw abonnement is overgenomen door KovoKs, kijk dan voor contactgegevens op https://www.kovoks.nl/. Dank voor uw vertrouwen de afgelopen jaren! Met

From: Matt Hyclak <hyclak at math.ohiou.edu> > Actually, the more direct replacement would be Dovecot. > Cyrus can be complicated to set up and get running. I actually modified the old UW IMAP 2002 SPEC file from RHL9/FC1, and modified a few config files, to support UW IMAP 2004b. I made one with both RFC3501 (no text passwords over SSL) and non-RFC3501 (legacy, text passwords

Bugs item #13560, was opened at 2007-08-31 15:07 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=13560&group_id=85 Category: win32-service Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Service dependencies has wierd string. Initial Comment: Hello, My name is Jong Lee from