similar to: Still having problems deleting messages through IMAP

I started testing Dovecot 1.0 Test 22! I loved the performance improvements, althought dovecot has been very fast for us from the beginning. However, now I am testing test 24 and 25, and I am seeing these errors in the dovecot log and squirrelmail is giving me a ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server. Query: STATUS "Mailing Lists.SpamAssassin" (MESSAGES UNSEEN RECENT) This is the

I have been having a problem with the test releases...I am now using Test 59. When I delete a message using SquirrelMail (IMAP) the message stays in the message list....but you can't open it anymore because it can't be found, if I logout and log back in...the message is gone from the list. I thought it could be a problem with the cache, so I added mail_never_cache_fields = MessagePart

Does anyone have a patch or information resource on implementing POP before SMTP with sendmail and DoveCot? I implemented it using a qpopper patch before we swiched to DoveCot for Maildirs. We have been using DoveCot for almost a year now and love it better than any other IMAP or POP3 server. Thanks for the info, Doug Eubanks SIMflex Internet Support support at simflex.com SIMflex Telephone

First, I am not a RedHat or linux newbie. I simply have not had to do what I am getting ready to do, and I want to see if I am going to run into a problems... My HDA drive is failing (I can hear the occasional click from it and I am seeing Smart errors, the transfer rate is slow but all my data is there). I have 3 partitions on it, the /, /boot/ and my game servers (this is also the drive the

The imap process crashes when SquirrelMail wants to move a message to another folder. I have run imap in gdb and talked to it the same way SquirrelMail does and got a backtrace. I am using Dovecot beta3. I am using it in combination with XMail, which has maildir databases. My system is Gentoo Linux on x86. The same version of Dovecot works great for me on amd64 with exactly the same config. Here

I'm a bit befuddled by this behavior. I've been using dovecot for close to a year, and recently the Fedora Core 2 Update: dovecot-0.99.13-4.FC2 build came in via yum. Since then I occasionally get this EXPUNGE disconnect error. When the error hits, the box does not crash but I can no longer log in*, nor start any new processes. I happen to have gkrellm running and I see a slow but steady

I need some help troubleshooting this problem. It only shows up with IMAP connections. I initially thought it was related to SquirrelMail (because it gives me an 'EXPUNGE' error), but after attempting to send IMAP commands directly to the server as shown below, I'm thinking there is something else going on. The system configuration is PostFix as the MTA delivering to procmail in

> On Jun 24, 2020, at 19:17, Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:23 PM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: > > > On 6/24/20 11:21 AM, Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 14:13, Arthur Eubanks via

Can you explain how to revert for someone who is a 2 on a git scale of 0 to 10? At 9/22/2020 03:51 PM, Arthur Eubanks wrote: >Yes, push whatever is needed to fix the build if the fix is fairly simple (else revert and get an LGTM with the fix). > >Next time I'd recommend creating and pushing a revert first if you can't quickly figure out the issue.

I am converting from courier and have noticed change in behaviour with Dovecot. I use maildirs with squirrelmail connecting by imap as well as a POP3 client. Courier would set the 'mail status-read' flag for any message which was downloaded with the POP3 interface. Dovecot apparently does not. Is this a bug or intended behaviour? If it is intentional, can it be changed with the config

I am working on upgrading our current squirrelmail and replace uw-imap with dovecot.? I have what looks like a successful installation.? My current setup is: Centos 5.2 sendmail 8.13.8 dovecot 1.1.17 (imap) squirrelmail 1.4.17 I can send and receive email fine.? However when I try to delete an email in my Inbox, it doesn't get deleted.? It only sends a copy to the Trash folder.? But the

Hmm it looks like getting NPM to work with opt is non-trivial. Only a small portion of the opt functionality works with NPM :( On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:36 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Maybe you could change the default PM in opt and see what fails? > > --paulr > > > > *From:* Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> > *Sent:* Monday,

Greetings, I have long read and followed this list. I have also spent a considerable time with our good friend Google. I am a long time Sendmail user, about 15 yrs now. I have recently been looking into the newer services and the Postfix setup seems to be a very nice one. I am migrating a mail server from 3.x to 4.x and was intending on trying out Postfix on the 4.x server. I have found

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:59 AM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 7:48 PM Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > After talking with some NPM people, I believe the ultimate goal after > NPM is enabled by default is to only support `-passes=`, and remove support > for `-foo-pass`. > Hm,

Hello mailing list subscribers! When I delete a message in Mac Mail 6.5 (OS X 10.8.4), with the option to move messages to the trash set in Mac Mail account preferences, the message is copied to the trash, and markes as trashed in the cur/inbox directory on the server (STa flag in the file name). My horde webmail then displays this messages correctly as trashed in the inbox. However, I want the

On 5/14/20 5:33 AM, Arthur Eubanks via llvm-dev wrote: > > Is it the case that with the legacy PM there is no inlining at > either -O2 or -O3 and with newPM there is? Or is there something else > going on? > Legacy PM inlines at -O2/-O3, new PM inlines at -O1/-O2/-O3. These > cases where inlining occurs also coincide with the test failure. I > agree that inlining itself

>RFC822 is HISTORIC: please refer to RFC2822 instead. > >While UTC is sufficient for human beings, but not necessarily accurate >for machines, because of the leap year adjustment. TAI is the You mean leap seconds, not leap years. Since 1972, UTC == TAI modulo some number of seconds. Leap Seconds are announced officially by the IERS http://www.iers.org/iers/products/eop/leap.html

On 5/13/20 3:31 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > I believe it's meant to run after /some/ optimizations to make it a bit > more efficient, while not so optimized that it misses opportunities to > detect bugs - but I could be wrong there. I'll leave it up to other folks > to chime in. I think that is right. The more transformations you run the more UB you can also

Here in the uk, to get a patent on anything, you have to prove that the patent is not obvious and that there is no prior art. If there is prior art, then a patent cannot be given, this is why people patenting stuff have to keep it a secret until they actually have the patent, otherwise it is considered to have been released into the public domain. Once something is in the public domain, nobody

Hi guys, In my routes file I have the following nested resource: resources :users do collection do get ''posts'' end end However, when I visit this URL: http://localhost:3000/users/posts, I get this error: "The action ''posts'' could not be found for UsersController" In my UsersController I have the following: class