similar to: outstanding issues with 0.99.13

Where tha Dave at? I''ve got 3 outstanding patches I''d like to see committed, or at least get some feedback on. -- William <wmorgan-ferret at masanjin.net>

I've got 2 old patches that will probably end up getting lost in the list, can someone ack? [PATCH node] Enables ability to have a common shared root [PATCH node] prevent hostvg and sharedroot from accepting same drive input

I finally merged to merge the last bits of the blocky.swf stuff from Nguyen into the AS branch. I think with this I just reduced the number of outstanding patches to zero. Or did I manage to miss anyone's patches? If so, please speak up now. :) I intend to throw all the mad hacking of the last months into a 0.5.0 release soon (ideally this week, but as I know myself I will keep getting

Anyone that have outstanding regressions in 2.05-pre2? I'm trying to remember. Please let me know ASAP since I'm hoping to release 2.05 before I leave on vacation next week. -hpa

I've been looking at the SFTP code and the filexfer RFC (and ended up answering my prior questions). I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts as to what might happen if the maximum number of outstanding requests was increased. Currently its set in sftp.c at /* Number of concurrent outstanding requests */ size_t num_requests = 16;

Somebody requested a path to listen without termination charges. Here's a SIP URI: (a SIP What??) karlonhold at sip.kfife.com or 3605195689 at 74.92.179.65 Thanks -Karl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090102/33b3bf7b/attachment.htm

Hello: Sorry for asking iozone ques in this mailing list but couldn't find any mailing list on iozone... In IOZone, is there a way to configure # of outstanding requests client sends to server side? Something on the lines of IOMeter option "Number of outstanding requests". Thanks a lot!

Hi! I'm apologize for my poor English, but have a question. This question is a shorter than one i posted not so long ago (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-September/175649.html) and received no answer for a while. In this question i took a log from the different server, but this is no matter: the problem persists on all of my servers. So, my OS is FreeBSD 9.0, my Samba is 3.6.18

Allison Smith just created a hysterical parody music on hold Parody. Whatever you were doing, stop, and dial this number to listen to it: 360-519-5689. 2 minutes. I just gave her a few ideas, but she took it and ran with it--she chose the audio and did the mix-down and everything. Really funny!! -Karl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I've got a list of ~20000 elements that look like this: [1] "A00096:A00096:A00096:A00096:A02178:A02178:A07776" [2] "A00046:A00076:A01101:A04146:A05671:A07169" [3] "A00038:A00932:A02185:A02370:A02818:A02818:A02818:A02818:A04732:A07142:A07142" [4] "A00096:A01352:A01352:A02023:A05001:A05001:A07776" [5]

http://dovecot.org/rc/ I guess the RCing in 0.99.12 didn't help that much. SQL/LDAP authentication crashed because memory was freed wrong. Please test so it would actually work in 0.99.13. Also fixed SEARCH UNKEYWORD which wasn't working. Also added 1.0-test's oe-ns-eoh POP3 workaround built-in. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Some more info: Just tried this on a server without using any NAT and no port forwarding, no masquerading, and I still have the same problem. So there goes that idea. I do not know what this VNAK error means. By the way, I am using the latest version (1.2.6) of asterisk, have also tried other versions with the same problem [1.0.9 (Ubuntu Breezy) and 1.0.7 (Debian Sarge) and 1.2.1 (Ubuntu

http://dovecot.org/rc/ Another one. Unless there are some bugs this will be the final version in a few days. * GNUTLS support hasn't been working for a while, so it's not even tried to be used anymore unless explicitly wanted. + Added CRAM-MD5 authentication mechanism. Patch by Joshua Goodall + Added SMD5 password scheme support and changed MD5 scheme with LDAP to act as

http://dovecot.org/rc/ One more. Added LDAP-MD5 password scheme and changed non-$1$-MD5 passwords to use it. This is how it's done in 1.0-tests. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

v0.99.13 2005-01-06 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> * GNUTLS support hasn't been working for a while, so it's not even tried to be used anymore unless explicitly wanted. + Added CRAM-MD5 authentication mechanism. Patch by Joshua Goodall + Added SMD5 and LDAP-MD5 password schemes and changed MD5 scheme to use LDAP-MD5 if the password isn't in MD5crypt format. Patch by

Hi, I'm seeing a problem that I'm hoping someone can help with. Neither Googling or searching the list archives have turned up anything useful. I'm running Dovecot0.99.13 on Fedora Core 3 and things work fine when using either Thunderbird 1.0 or Outlook Express as clients. Outlook (2002 SP3) on the other hand runs incredibly slowly. Any ideas, would be

Greetings, the Eudora client is attempting to create a subfolder of an existing folder, using the "Make it a folder option" which creates a directory under /home/<user>/mail/<a few paths>. Eudora is seemingly stuck in attempting to create the directory, but there is nothing under /var/log which seems useful in diagnosing the problem. Thank you for your consideration,

I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new RHEL5 system and am having trouble getting the UIDLs to move over right, mainly the UID. I copy over the mailbox, and see the x-uid in the message is what it was on the old server, but when I telnet in to check pop, it rewrites x-uid in the message to something new, causing old messages to get downloaded again, which is not what we want I have tried

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just to give some more information about this: Apparently some of our POP3 users are saying that when they checked for new mail this morning that all the mail that was saved on the server was downloaded again as unread mail. I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1] with regards to upgrading from 0.99 to 1.0, made sure the .subscriptions and

Our samba server in ap-east-1 is running very slow today I noticed three things in log.smb, and I don't understand any of them ---------- #1 roughly every 80 seconds what appears to be a reconnect loop [2020/11/19 17:35:46.283315, 2] ../../source3/lib/tallocmsg.c:87(register_msg_pool_usage) Registered MSG_REQ_POOL_USAGE [2020/11/19 17:35:46.287132, 1]