Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Proposed dovecot update changes in Fedora"
2004 Jun 04
2
Fedora dovecot Testing Needed
http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/dovecot/
dovecot-0.99.10.5 binary packages for FC1 and FC2 are available here.  I 
need feedback from Fedora users with THESE ACTUAL BINARIES before 
pushing them to official updates.
Note:
This does not solve the SSL related crash issue.  That requires a patch 
to OpenSSL or kernel.  I am still trying to convince the maintainers to 
patch it.
Warren Togami
2004 May 27
5
0.99.10.5 released
One more bugfix since rc2:
	- Maildir: synchronization might have sometimes set wrong flags to
	  messages, or crash completely
Quite rare because we were lucky before :)
And list of all the changes one more time:
v0.99.10.5 2003-12-27  Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>
	+ MySQL authentication, patch by Matthew Reimer
	+ --with-moduledir configure option
	- mbox: APPEND reversed given
2004 Aug 10
0
Shockwave Flash player for CentOS [Fwd from Warren Togami]
So there's your answer, Rick.  How persistent are you? :-)
Michael
----- Forwarded message from Warren Togami <warren at togami.com> -----
>So, Warren, how'd you do it? :)
3 months of harassing them and several NDA and licensing agreements I 
had to sign.  Good luck...
Warren
----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/ 
2003 May 17
1
Postfix locking equivalence?
/etc/postfix/main.cf.default:
mailbox_delivery_lock = flock, dotlock
Is flock equivalent to dovecot's fnctl locking?  For mbox what type of
locking settings should I be using?  (No NFS, only local filesystem.)
Warren Togami
warren at togami.com
2003 Apr 14
1
dovecot RPM for Red Hat Linux
http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=160
This .src.rpm is dovecot with RH-specific default settings.  I modified
Jeremy Katz' dovecot-0.99.8.1 package a bit.  When I upgraded from
0.99.8.1 it seemed to be broken until I looked at /var/log/maillog. 
There it indicated that the dovecot cache files were bad, so I erased
/home/*/mail/.imap/ and it seemed to work subsequently.
There are a
2003 May 07
4
dovecot and squirrelmail
Is anyone using squirrelmail with dovecot?  After a few minor tweaks
squirrelmail seems to work great, but I can't seem to get rid of the
"./" folder.
SquirrelMail implements some workaround hacks for specific IMAP server
quirks.  The default setting is:
$imap_server_type       = 'uw';
What settings do you folks use?
Thanks,
Warren Togami
warren at togami.com
2003 May 05
1
0.99.9.1 - Runaway imap-login process
PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU COMMAND
32116 dovecot   19   0  1464 1464  1212 R    99.9  0.1  60:58   0
imap-login
service dovecot stop
ps -ef |grep imap-login |grep -v grep
dovecot  32116     1 98 01:27 ?        01:01:33 imap-login
/etc/dovecot.conf:
auth_userdb = passwd
uth_passdb = pam
I think this was triggered while I attempted to login to IMAP with the
2003 Aug 19
1
Squirrelmail and Dovecot folder namespace
I am currently using Squirrelmail and Dovecot with this setting:
default_mail_env = mbox:%h/mail/:INBOX=%h/mail/INBOX
It works well, however folder subscriptions in Squirrelmail annoyingly
end up with "./" prefixes because Squirrelmail refuses to work without
overriding the folder namespace.  All of my other IMAP clients work fine
without setting that option.
Squirrelmail's
2003 Oct 09
1
Dovecot pop3 and Outlook Express timeout
> Vince did some troubleshooting at my Dad's place and found that part of
> the problem was related to dovecot timing out in communicating with
> outlook express.  Any ideas?  You can do a raw pop3 connection which works
> fine, but if you try to do the same from within outlook it times out or
> gives "server not found".  This sounds like what I was experiencing here
2003 Apr 15
1
Three *very* strange bugs
* Attached is a mbox file that triggers Bug #1 and #2.
* Go here if you want to test dovecot for RH9:
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=160
* If somebody has a different IMAP server than dovecot, could you please
test how Evolution reacts to reading this message?
Bug #1 dovecot and #2 evolution-1.2.3
=====================================
I am using dovecot-0.99.9-test3 on RH9, reading
2003 Sep 12
1
dovecot IMAP misserving problem?
http://togami.com/~warren/archive/2003/evolution-1.4.4-crash.mbox
I suspect that dovecot-0.99.10 is misserving this message in some way
that is confusing some IMAP clients.  This behavior causes
evolution-1.4.4 to segfault, and squirrelmail-1.4.1 to be unable to read
the message.  The same message served by uw-imapd works works fine in
both evolution and squirrelmail.
2003 Apr 15
0
The Discover(r) Platinum Wildlife Card - Go Wild
Offer Expires April 30, 2003
X-Rcpt-To: <warren at togami.com>
Get a 0% Intro APR* on Purchases and Balance Transfers
You?ve been selected for a special No-Annual-Fee Discover? Card with all of these privileges:
? 0% Intro APR on Purchases and Balance Transfers*
? No Annual Fee
? Up to 2% Cashback Bonus? award*
? Up to $50,000 Credit Limit
Start Saving Today ? APPLY NOW! It's fast,
2003 Sep 09
0
squirrelmail + dovecot + qmail + vpopmail error
ERROR : Could not complete request.
Query: COPY 99:99 "INBOX.SPAM"
Reason Given: [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX.SPAM
Running latest stable version of squirrelmail, dovecot, qmail and
vpopmail with Maildir storage in virtual users.
One of my users reports seeing this yesterday, then it went away for a
few hours, then early in the next day it happened again on the same
2013 Jul 31
0
DNS update shows errors TKEY is unacceptable on joined Samba 4 DC
Dear all,
after succesfull joining my new samba 4 DC to the domain.
There is an error on using,  samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names
On the new joined dc: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable
Failed nsupdate: 1
How can I fix it!? Dnsupdate on the Master is running well.
[root at s4slave etc]# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names
IPs: ['192.168.135.253']
Skipping PDC entry (SRV
2013 Jan 11
0
Samba 4 TSIG Error "NOTIMP"
Hi!
I've got troubles with dynamic dns updates.
Ubuntu: 12.04 / Samba 4.0.0 / followed off. howto
Winsrv: Server 2k8R2
root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# samba -V
Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-94f11e9
root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# kinit administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL
Password for administrator at SCHAU.LOCAL:
root at tuxsrv:/home/schau# klist
Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0
Default principal: administrator
2004 Apr 09
3
Help ! Logon script doesn't work on XP
Hi,
I have very strange problem:
I had created logon script (bat file dynamically generated by root peexec)
and tested it successfully on Win98 workstation.
Now I'm testing it on XP wkst., but the same (created by the same method)
script is during logon not executed.
What is absolutely mysterious for me ? The script is really read by
workstation durin logon - I saw it in network traffic
2017 Dec 11
2
Replication problems bdc to pdc
Hello,
Replication from backup Active Directory Domain Controler to primary 
Active Directory Domain Controler does not work, reporting error ' 
WERR_BADFILE '. The reverse works.
  * Linux: Raspbian, debian stretch lite
  * Samba version 4.5.12-Debian
  * DNS: BIND9_DLZ 9.10.x
  * Installed packages: ntp ntpdate samba smbclient winbind libcups2
    samba-common cups ldb-tools bind9
2018 Nov 10
2
Problem DNS samba_dnsupdate
Hi all
I have configured domain controler in debian 9 (samba 4.5.12-Debian).
Dns is internal samba. locally works well (I think) but from another
computer I can not query DNS. The problem is with samba_dnsupdate
My configuration:
smb.conf
# Global parameters
[global]
    netbios name = DC
    realm = BEWPHOTO.LOCAL
    workgroup = BEWPHOTO
    dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8
    server role = active
2013 Jan 02
3
Samba ADDS DC krb5 and samba_nsupdate
Hello
I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC.
I want use BIND for dns system.
To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind.
It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record.
If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message:
This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones.
If I remove the DC the dns-names
2019 Aug 07
2
Bind9 doesn't updated - TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
Hello everybody,
I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description:
   - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6
   on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS;
   - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and  as DC
   to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End;
   - *king* has updated dns zones and