similar to: test61 ./configure fails on OpenBSD 3.6

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "test61 ./configure fails on OpenBSD 3.6"

2005 Jan 23
1
Experimental FreeBSD ports / packages for test61
Hello, If anyone would like it I have provided a Dovecot 1.0 test61 port and package for FreeBSD 5.3 here. I made them for my own experimentation but thought they might be interesting to others I suppose. http://www.helenmarks.co.uk/~dom/dovecot/ These deviate from the stock test61 because I've updated and added a patch I wrote a long time ago for ioloop kqueue/kevent support in
2005 Feb 21
0
index corruption with test62 on openbsd 3.6
i noticed this while browsing through my maillog.. Feb 21 11:27:43 selenium dovecot: IMAP(ben): Corrupted index cache file /u/home/ben/Maildir/.INBOX.ML-SunHELP.rescue/dovecot.index.cache: field index too large (3337 >= 22) i have no problems reading that box after this, and see no other messages about corrupt index files from today, or the past 14 days. --ben
2005 Jan 26
1
mbox slowness in dovecot-1.0-test61
Hi, We're trying out Dovecot to see if it's a good replacement for UW-imapd. It seems to be very slow in opening an mbox file, even after it's been indexed. (I mean way slower than UW) Here's some info on the system: Dovecot-1.0-test61 SuSE 8.1, Linux kernel 2.4 Using NFS to access mail. I've tried turning off mmap, using dotlocking, using fcntl locking (lockd, etc. are
2005 Jan 14
0
Strange behavior of mysql 4.1.8/9 + dovecot1.0-test58~test61 on Fedora 3 x86_64 machine
Some additional tests. I tried to add a test connection in the main.c under auth, which should be the main file of dovecot-auth. The test connection is done as the first statement in the int main() function. However, it still reports that the connection fails due to access denied. What should I do?? Any suggestions are welcomed. -----Original Message----- From: dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org
2005 Jan 17
0
test61 + kmail problem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello :) I'm using dovecot 1.0-test61 and it works ok with most MUAs except with KMail (1.7.1 KDE 3.3.1) Kmail downloads message headers from folder (i'm using IMAP), but displays that there is only one email message in each folder... Well, i have thousands of messages in each folder. Everything works okay with Thunderbird 1.0. Ideas?
2017 Jul 13
2
Replicated volume, one slow brick
I have been trying to figure out how glusterfs-fuse client will handle it when 1 of 3 bricks in a 3-way replica is slower than the others. It looks like a glusterfs-fuse client will send requests to all 3 bricks when accessing a file. But what happens when one of the bricks is not responding in time? We saw an issue when we added external load to the raid volume where the brick was located. The
2005 Jan 14
0
Strange behavior of mysql 4.1.8/9 + dovecot 1.0-test58~test61 on Fedora 3 x86_64 machine
I've built & configured the dovecot to use mysql as the passdb and userdb. However, dovecot-auth always claims that the username/password of mysql server is wrong (access denied by mysql server) during the connection. When I set the password to NULL, it can successfully connect to mysql server! I am 100% sure that I typed the correct password (by copy & paste), and I can successfully
2005 Jan 18
0
test61 error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:39 Error: IMAP(bfg at noviforum.si): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 138 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq ~ || min_file_offset <= max_file_offset) dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:39 Error: child 18837 (imap) killed with signal 6 dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:52 Info: imap-login: Login:
2005 Jan 13
0
1.0-test61
http://dovecot.org/test/ - Fixes crashes with keyword code - Fixes some problems with parsing MIME multipart bodies - Fixes some problems with parsing mail addresses - Support %vars in LDAP base setting -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
2005 Feb 05
1
New user Q: dovecot-0.99-13 / UnixWare 7.1.0
Trying to get dovecot up and running. I managed to get everything compiled and linked correctly, but there seems to be some problem with either the auth process or communication between the main process and the auth process. When I try to login, I get: * OK dovecot ready. 1 login n9yty testing * OK Waiting for authentication process to respond.. And I keep getting the same message over and
2018 Jan 23
1
[PATCH] customize: Use libxcrypt if available to provide crypt(3).
glibc 2.27 removes crypt(3) and suggests using libxcrypt. libxcrypt requires <crypt.h> to be included. --- customize/Makefile.am | 1 + customize/crypt-c.c | 4 ++++ m4/guestfs-misc-libraries.m4 | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/Makefile.am b/customize/Makefile.am index b4ec9286a..a22e25c46 100644
2005 Mar 12
1
dovecot test62 vs test64
Greetings: I've been using Dovecot 1.0-test62. It has been working well. I tried to upgrade to 1.0-test64 but users could not authenticate. Both versions I compiled with: ./configure --with-ssl=openssl; make; make install They compiled and installed fine. The /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf needed to be modified due to the new syntax. 1.0-test64 with the new dovecot.conf didn't work.
2005 Feb 06
1
crash with test62
Hi, Got the following today with test62 and mbox: IMAP(juergen): Fixed index file /home/juergen/Mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index: recent_messages_count 19 -> 0 imap-login: Login: juergen [192.168.0.1] file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 118 (mail_index_sync_deinit_handlers): assertion failed: (size <= synch_size) child 31196 (imap) killed with signal 6 after that I had to delete
2005 Apr 12
1
test67 ldap_connection
Hello, I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with authentication against an ldap pass/user db with test67 as test62 was working fine. [ The problem is the same as previously described in this list : - FreeBSD-5.3 - dovecot-1.0-test67 - openldap-2.1.27 --> "ldap(dovetest,127.0.0.1): No password in reply" --> "NO Temporary authentication failure." or --
2006 Jul 19
2
Patch suggestion
Hi, Would it be possible to make a change in the configure file to search for gssapi.h in <kerberosV/gssapi.h> if it fails to find it in <gssapi/gssapi.h>? That would allow to compile dovecot with gssapi easily on OpenBSD without patching it. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186
2016 Feb 17
2
[PATCH supermin 0/2] Allow an alternate libc to be used for init.
Allow an alternate libc, such as dietlibc, to be used for the init binary in the supermin appliance. Rich.
2013 Aug 19
5
[PATCH v2 0/3 supermin] URPMI & xz support.
Joseph, Please try my modified versions of these patches. These are compile-tested on Fedora and they don't break any existing functionality, but I don't have either urpmi nor a statically-linked xz so I cannot fully test them. I have also fixed detection of zlib (2/3). Rich.
2008 Jun 24
1
[LLVMdev] jit DLLs
> ?yvind Harboe wrote: >> Are JIT DLLs supported? >> >> The idea is to use llvm to put performance sensitive code into >> a DLL that a Windows app can then use. >> >> This would build the performance sensitive code on the target >> machine making it possible to exploit CPU specific x86 >> vector instructions. >> >> The code that calls
2004 Oct 21
3
1.0-test51
http://dovecot.org/test/ This release is built with autoconf 2.59 and libtool 1.9. We'll see how it works out :) The required changes were done by Matthias Andree. - The last fix for connection hanging made IDLE use 100% CPU - We don't use Maildir/.INBOX/ directory anymore, indexes are stored in Maildir-root - Don't crash with FETCH BODY[n.MIME] - Changed %p (protocol)
2008 Jun 22
1
[LLVMdev] Backend for the ZPU - a stack based / zero operand CPU
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, [ISO-8859-1] ?yvind Harboe wrote: >> The ZPU has two instructions that I'd also like to use. These instructions >> can push a value from deeper down on the stack and also pop a value >> from the stack and store them deeper down on the stack. > > Sounds like the Intel X87 floating point stack, which we support. GCC does as well. Supporting floating