similar to: Worthwile to use quotas?

Hello and good evening. Sorry for responding so late, it is midsummer and i spend as much time as possible on the outside (bicycle, mostly). (Just one more day, then 10 degrees colder!!) I Cc: Wietse Venema, because i quote a message of him. (this is "set quote-add-cc" here.) Aki Tuomi wrote in <84881193.5398.1597934431687 at appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>: The dovecot

There's a big thread about filesystems on postfix-users@postfix.org Could you shed some light on that issue? ----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> ----- From: wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 07:53:26 -0500 (EST) To: Lawrence Greenfield <leg+@andrew.cmu.edu> Cc: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>,

Postfix <http://www.postfix.org> does a chattr +S on its spool directory when it is installed on Linux. This is what is written in the postfix startup script -- # # LINUX by default does not synchronously update directories - # that's dangerous for mail. # if [ -f /usr/bin/chattr ] then CHATTR="/usr/bin/chattr +S" else CHATTR=echo fi -- Is this still required on ext3 ?

Hello. I am not subscribed and new here, so first of all i want to thank you for dovecot. I personally do not use it in "production" (yet), but it is my sole point of interaction for testing the little MUA i maintain for quite some years. I also have used its code for affirmation purposes. (Interesting that OAUTHBEARER treats hostname and port as optional. I currently do

Hello, Here is the description of a problem we habe been having for some time. Originally posted on the postfix-users mailing list, but no solution found to date. >>>> We have been having problems with our mail system for a couple of >>>> months. Every now and then, some mailboxes get corrupted: a >>>> half-truncated message, usually without headers, is at

Aki Tuomi wrote in <1907575568.4364.1597984769802 at appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com>: |> On 21/08/2020 02:17 Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen at sdaoden.eu> wrote: ... |> Wietse Venema wrote in |> <4BXSTk189nzJrP3 at spike.porcupine.org>: |> ... |>|Steffen Nurpmeso: |> ... |>|> until SASL says it is done?!. How could EXTERNAL ever work

Dear Open SSH and TCP Wrappers Colleagues, We are trying to use open ssh 3.1p1 on SPARC platforms under Solaris 2.8 using gcc 2.95.2, in conjunction with tcp wrappers 7.6 (IPv6 version). The wrapping of open ssh is not too well documented but I think we have figured most of this out (hearty thanks to Wietse Venema, Jim Mintha & Niels Provos for their helpful email exchanges) -- but have one

Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk

Howyd all? Seems that I have been routed. Possibly by a physical B&E, but who knows? Probably some of you do.... anyways, some politically sensitive email was deleted from a user account and the line low -tr & inserted into my .xinitrc . Duncan (Dhu) Campbell

On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: >> On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I >>> have >>> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam... >> >> What makes Postfix superior in fighting

Ian Jackson: > I recently encountered a bug where some ssh login sessions would > apparently inherit a blocked SIGALRM. A web search showed up two > relevant threads: > http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2005-Dec/2628.html > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=113533337923128&w=2 > et seq - but sadly no answers. > > Experimentation with

http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ Valgrind is a GPL'd tool to help you find memory-management problems in your programs. When a program is run under Valgrind's supervision, all reads and writes of memory are checked, and calls to malloc/new/free/delete are intercepted. As a result, Valgrind can detect problems such as: * Use of uninitialised memory * Reading/writing memory after

I don't know if this is RedHat 5.1 specific, but be aware that the version of portmap distributed is the enhanced (Wietse Venema) version. That's great, except for two things. The first is documented, but easy to overlook: "In order to avoid deadlocks, the portmap program does not attempt to look up the remote host name or user name...The upshot of all this is that only network

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> writes: > By the way, on the NUT CI farm the libwrap is present on some (though not > all) systems - covering linux, freebsd, openindiana... and neither > complained about `sockdebug` :\ > > What version do you have? Maybe it is some alternate implementation? Looks like 7.4, as amended in NetBSD over the years. Looks like the

Hello fellow CentOS users, I'm using: # cat /etc/*release CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # rpm -qa | grep post postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 on 2 servers: preferans.de and (yes, funny name) static.103.78.9.176.clients.your-server.de I own several domains and would like all incoming mails addressing those domains to be forwarded to my Gmail address. So I have setup the MX-records for my

I would be surprised if someone hasn''t encountered this already, but I haven''t found any discussion of the nature of this problem. I run RehHat 5.0. If a user makes a mistake in the login process such as the following: login: mistake password: xxx Login incorrect! login: username password xxxx bash$ a ps will show, among other things, 2333 /bin/login --mistake. Since

RH4.2 Linux Intel Last night I got three of these log messages: Two in a row, one a bit later. May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: warning: can''t get client address: Connectio n reset by peer May 8 00:35:15 osg-gw imapd[4307]: refused connect from unknown Now, I have imapd blocked to non-local users using tcpd wrappers, so tcpd is trying to find the address of the remote machine (all

Hello again Reindl Harald I always thought Wietse Venema was only as smart as me ;-) seriously thank you for the help. On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 17.02.2015 um 22:51 schrieb Robert Fantini: > >> I want to make sure that the postfix delivery does not give up trying to >> get the email delivered when the

I'm migrating our mailserver from cyrus 2.0 to Postfix and Dovecot. We're using maildirs delivered to /var/maildir, which is mounted via NFS from a Netapp. My understanding was that maildir was completely happy in an NFS environment but I've seen a couple messages here recently which mention the dovecot index files not being NFS safe. Are their any caveats or gotcha's that I

Salve, I''m protecting hades with the tcpd wrappers and had no problems so far, at least none that I noticed. Today happend something strange. An attacker got a connect on a protected port from a not allowed IP: > Unusual System Events > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= BTW, thanks for that tool. > Jul 1 03:34:56 hades in.null[18321]: twist > slip139-92-93-124.hol.ch.ibm.net to