similar to: duplicate woes

Hi, I use dovecot 0.99-11 with sendmail latest, and clamav-milter, and spamass-milter. Whole setup works great. We only use dovecot for pop3, no imap. We use primarily Outlook 2000-2003 for a client. I have a couple of users who prefer to leave a copy of each message on the server. I read the archives about the Outlook Duplicate Message problem regarding the setting 'Leave a copy on

I am using version 1.4.1.0040 and 2.6.1.0003. I have read about newer versions out there, how can I get them? I'm having an intermittent issue regarding DHCP with one of my phones, and I recall when I loaded 1.4.1 on this one phone, it failed once, then it succeeded the second time. I am wondering if a firmware update will help. Or is there any known issues with Fedora Core 2 dhcpd and IP

Hi, I have one pop3 client who has three computers, and he has Outlook XP on two, and 2003 on the third. They are all set to leave a copy of messages on the server, and that causes a duplicate message for every message he gets. I then can tell him to uncheck the "leave a copy on the server" box, and pop his mail, and the duplicates will go away for two or three days, only to start up

I am thinking of having a pots line with multiple numbers on it, and having Asterisk dial my desk if the outside caller dials xxx-xxx-xxx1, and ring another desk if the person called xxx-xxx-xxx2, etc. Can Asterisk do this? -- Jeff Ramsey MIS Administrator Tubafor Mill, Inc.

Hi, I have a user who is getting a strange error when popping his mail over a DSL line. The error in my log file is as follows: file client.c: line 237 (client_send_line): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == str_len(str)) I can POP his mail just find here locally connected to the server via 100bT, but over his DSL link, he gets this error. His mailbox size is 24MB, and he is using outlook w/

I am building an IMAP server that uses Dovecot/Sendmail on FC3 to replace our POP server that uses Dovecot (via POP)/Sendmail on FC2. My new server is authenticating users via winbind/smb against my WIndows 2003 Active Directory. The authentication is working great. The problem come up when a user gets an email and has not ever logged into the IMAP server via SSH, local, or GDM,

I have been using Dovecot for an IMAP server for a few years now, with no hitch. Even using Outlook 2K/2K3 as a client. Yesterday, I had a user experience the 'Negative UIDs' issue spoken of here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Clients/NegativeUIDs I performed all of the steps mentioned in this article, and it seemed like it would work properly the first time the user checked their

--- David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Roman Levenstein wrote: > > The allocator does not handle register aliases and register classes > > correctly, which makes it rather unusable for most architectures. > One > > idea that can be used for improving handling of irregular > architectures > > is described in the "A Generalized Algorithm for

Hello R-Users, The following questions are not R-technical, but more of general statistical nature. 1. NORMALITY I built a normal linear regression model and now I want to check for the residual normality assumption. If I check the distribution graphically and look at the descriptive characteristics (skewness and kurtosis are below 1), I would confirm that the residuals are normally

Roman Levenstein wrote: > The allocator does not handle register aliases and register classes > correctly, which makes it rather unusable for most architectures. One > idea that can be used for improving handling of irregular architectures > is described in the "A Generalized Algorithm for Graph-Coloring > Register Allocation" by Michael D. Smith, Norman Ramsey and Glenn

I was hoping some one might be able to offer me some advice on a little problem I have. I am looking to A. move from mbox to maildir B. looking to move from tpop to dovecot to bring both pop and imap under the same program. anyways the problem I am having is this tpop3d mbox uses MD5 sum of the mailbox headers in hex which is option %m in the uidl section but the problem is when dovecot

On 3/13/2017 2:15 PM, Arthur Ramsey via samba wrote: > Upgraded to 4.6.0 on all nodes. Still seeing the same issue. > > If I create an object on vsc-dc02, epo-dc01 or aws-dc01 DCs it doesn't > replicate. If I create it on vsc-dc01 (PDC emulator) then it does > replicate. > > On 03/13/2017 12:13 PM, Arthur Ramsey wrote: >> >> I believe the problem is a lack

Hi, --- Anton Vayvod <avayvod at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/3/07, David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > > > > I'm just starting to dive into llvm, hoping to implement a > > good graph coloring register allocator. I gather that this > > has been discussed before. > > > > What is the RegAllocGraphColoring.cpp currently in the >

Executing the following with nsupdate seems to have fixed replication. update add 28f7281f-3955-4885-8a7d-42a36ee87590._msdcs.mediture.dom. 900 A 192.168.222.5 show send update add 8b750a53-3d39-4bc0-8fe9-9bffa9e413aa._msdcs.mediture.dom. 900 A 172.16.1.106 show send update add fe066b13-6f9e-4f3c-beb4-37df1292b8cb._msdcs.mediture.dom. 900 A 192.168.168.65 show send New DNS records I create

That's too bad, I was trying to get the Vasco Identikey server working with samba4 as a backend for FIPS 140-2 compliant OTP, which will only bind with DIGEST-MD5. I guess I will have to join a Windows 2008 R2 to the domain as a domain controller. Thanks for clarifying, Arthur On 07/10/2015 04:38 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 15:10 -0500, Arthur Ramsey wrote:

Hi Dave, --- David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Roman Levenstein wrote: > > > Yes, the SUIF allocator (or at least one of them) implements the > > Smith/Ramsey/Holloway algorithm. This is what I understand by > looking > > at the coloring reggister allocator code in the SUIF distribution. > The > > SUIF code of this allocator is not very

Yeah, I'm trying to setup the Indentikey server on Windows instead so it uses the Windows API instead of LDAP rather than setup a Windows 2008 R2 domain controller for LDAP w/ SASL DIGEST-MD5 authentication. It seems silly for them to use DIGEST-MD5, but that's what I stuck with for now. If samba4 could support DIGEST-MD5 that would be great. Thanks, Arthur On 07/10/2015 03:29 PM,

Roman Levenstein wrote: > Yes, the SUIF allocator (or at least one of them) implements the > Smith/Ramsey/Holloway algorithm. This is what I understand by looking > at the coloring reggister allocator code in the SUIF distribution. The > SUIF code of this allocator is not very well commented, but I'm pretty > sure. Do you have a pointer? I'm interested in this algorithm

Can anyone tell me where I can find documentation on setting up my laptop to see my shared files on my Linux box? I have the basic settings set but I keep getting the error I don't have permission from my laptop. Thanks Mark W Ramsey mramsey@charter.net Linux the OS that is making a Difference

Anton Vayvod wrote: > Sure, but where these comparisons are needed, for example? RAX and > EAX alias sets intersect and that's enough to decide that these regs > can't be assigned simultaneously. One place these comparisons are used is to build a provably optimal register class tree in a Smith/Ramsey/Holloway allocator. Building it algorithmically is portable to all