similar to: Problem with openvpn and tun interface

Hi all. I have an OpenVPN server: 2.2.1-1 x86_64 Server config: port 11223 dev tap proto udp tls-server ca keys/ca.crt cert keys/server.crt key keys/server.key dh keys/dh1024.pem server 1.2.3.3 255.255.255.0 push "route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.4" keepalive 10 60 client-to-client duplicate-cn inactive 600 log /var/log/openvpn.log syslog status /var/log/openvpn-status.log user

Hi, this reminds me of my troubles of setting up samba BDC at remote company branch. Connection was done by IPSEC tunnel between 2 mikrotik routers. Thing was, ipsec supports only unicast, but not multicast,nor broadcast. Solved it by adding L2TP tunnel that support the above mentioned mechanisms. So ended up with the l2tp (which has very weak encryption and is very old and vulnerable)

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX

Friends-- I'm stumped! Cannot get mount.cifs to work over a tun connection. How would you trouble-shoot this? 1. It cannot be openvpn causing the problem: I can ping across the connection both directions on all machines. 2. It cannot be samba causing the problem: I can mount.cifs the smb shares on the lan (using the identical credentials file) without any issue. 3. Have iptables

hey friends, I have installed OpenVPN 2.0.7 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO] [EPOLL] built on Apr 29 2006) on Centos4.0 through rpm (diag repository). The network scenario of my office is below Remote Client ----> Internet <-------> Cisco Pix Firewall (Gateway) <----> VPN Server & LAN Clients

Hello I read a whole book on OpenVPN, but still can't figure how to configure the server + client so that the the client connects and sends SIP/RTP data through the tunnel. To get started, I'd rather use a shared key instead of X509 (certificates + keys). The server is running on a uClinux appliance, with /dev/net/tun, and OpenVPN is 2.0.9. The clients will be Windows hosts connecting

I recently took over a x86_64 CentOS 4.0 server running an "unsupported" kernel. On examining the box it seems that perhaps it is because of the use of xfs and netatalk. I would like to update the box to 4.3. I think I can do away with the netatalk, but doing away with xfs would require a substantial amount of work. Questions: 1: In reading the archive of this list there was a post

Hi Everyone, For some reason a few phones connected to a pfSense box can't make or allow in OpenVPN in port 1194 UDP. So, I established the VPN tunnel on 1194 TCP and it works fine. I would like to know if there is any disadvantages to using TCP over UDP for the tunnel when using Asterisk or is just as reliable and solid as a UDP tunnel? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

W dniu 29.12.2017 o?10:32, Kenneth Porter pisze: > How do I insert the iptables rule below using firewalld? > > I'm moving up from CentOS 6 to 7 on an office gateway and I'm trying > to get OpenVPN working to allow home workers to access PCs at the > office. I've got it all working but only by manually inserting an > ACCEPT rule in the FORWARD iptables chain: >

On 12/29/2017 3:59 AM, Wojciech ?ysiak wrote: > firstly check which zone are your interface in : > > bash> firewall-cmd --get-active-zones > > then all you have to do is add a service to the firewall > > firewall-cmd --zone=<INSERT YOUR ZONE> --add-service=openvpn --permanent > > assuming that your Openvpn is running on standard port 1194/tcp|udp, > If not

Hi All, I am working on a mystery. I am using openvpn-2.1_beta7-gui-1.0.3-install on all the computers in question. All computers are running XP-Pro-SP2. (Mine is running in a virtual window -- details below.) This configuration works perfectly from my office. I use it to call five facilities: remote aa.bb.cc.dd port 5030 proto udp dev tap ifconfig 192.168.240.30 255.255.255.0 secret

You need to ensure that traffic to the SIP box is sent to the correct IP. Also if you use split-tunnel (eg: not redirect-gateway def1) you must make sure NAT and traffic redirection works as is so the Asus router knows it should send the traffic through tunnel and not via WAN. IMPORTANT: Then you must, in the ASUS RT-N66U make a port forward inwards from TUN to the phone client. I would suggest

I want to check some client OpenVPN TUN interfaces with MRTG running at my VPN server, so I have to specify their OID interface numbers in mrtg.cfg. The problem is, these numbers are dynamic, as they may change whenever OpenVPN restarts for any reason... so, how can I write stanzas such as Target[somehostvpninterface] : ifInOctets.X&ifOutOctets.X:public@ <SOMEHOST.IP> without wiring up

Hello guys, I past the last days trying to configure my shorewall 4.06 firewall to allow openvpn bridging connection. My scenario is the following: roadwarrior (openvpn client) -------------> Internet ------------> (X.Y.W.Z - eth0) Firewall/Gateway (10.x.x.254 - eth1) --------> Local Lan -------> OpenVPN Server (10.x.x.249 - br0) where 10.x.x.0-254 is my private lan X.Y.Z.W is

I have previously set up an openvpn LAN to LAN bridging VPN so I know a little about what has to happen. The gateways on either ends were running older version of shorewall that did not support openvpn directly so I just basically opened ports for it and used bridging with tap interfaces. I am no longer using that vpn link to the other house but now that i''ve upgraded I would like

From: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com> Fixes LP: #806537 Signed-off-by: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com> --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 7 ++++++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn index 2b4bfd6..d80f42f 100644 ---

I see that this openvpn rule has been modified to no longer attach the ":port" part to "[undef]" -- probably to reflect a recent change in openvpn. Unfortunately, the rule no longer matches in etch, thus breaking the backport. Here's a patch to match both versions. Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net> --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn

Signed-off-by: Fr?d?ric Bri?re <fbriere at fbriere.net> --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn index 68ebf8f..c57e3cb 100644 --- a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn +++ b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn @@ -13,7 +13,7