similar to: direct access or local IMAP access?

Joseph Tam wrote: > > > However, I often read and modify the mailboxes locally with mutt (e.g. > > append and delete mails). > > > > Should I expect any problems wit Dovecot indexes etc? What if I even > > do "rm ~/Mail/some/mailbox", will Dovecot be mad at me? > > I do it all the time. Works fine. Great, thank you! > > As others have

Hello, after I started to use dovecot as a backend for exim4 SMTP authentication on my main mailserver, I noticed that some clients don't advertise unicode support and so they can't log in. To fix the problem the attached patch allows use of OEM encoding in NTLM messages. Please consider applying. Best regards. P.S. I want to release exim4 patch in the near future, probably when Timo

In such case, as long as the API is not upgraded, should doveadm index -A -q \* be considered a replacement of doveadm fts rescan On 2019-02-14 16:24, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote: > Hi, > > The rescan() function is a bit badly designed. Currently what you could do what fts-lucene does and: > - Get list of UIDs for all mails in each folder > - If Xapian has UID that

Hi, THis is a core problem in Dovecot in my understanding. In my opinion, the rescan in dovecot should send to the FTS plugin the list of "supposedly" indexed emails (UID), and the plugin shall purge the redundant UID (i..e UID present in the index but not in the list sent by dovecot) and send back the list of UID not in its indexes to dovecot, so Dovect can send one by one the

On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote: > VirtIO 1.0 spec says > The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY > apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator > to rescan the target to detect this. > > This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the > entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a

On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote: > VirtIO 1.0 spec says > The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY > apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator > to rescan the target to detect this. > > This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the > entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a

Hello Julius, Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. I installed sg3_utils and ran #scsi-rescan but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. Cheers, Boris. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tnjulius <tnjulius at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Boris, > Just rescan the scsi host. > #scsi-rescan #if you have sg3_utils package > #lsscsi > Or > #echo "- - -"

The kernel side for rescan, which is needed if you want to enable qgroup tracking on a non-empty volume. The first patch splits btrfs_qgroup_account_ref into readable ans reusable units. The second patch adds the rescan implementation (refer to its commit message for a description of the algorithm). The third patch starts an automatic rescan when qgroups are enabled. It is only separated to

Hi, I'm using Dovecot 2.2.13 with Dovecot Director, Doveadm server and FTS. I want to run doveadm on Director hosts, but Dovecot server on backend hosts reject "fts *" commands. On Dovecot Director hosts: # doveadm fts optimize -u u0001 at example.jp # echo $? 75 # doveadm fts rescan -u u0001 at example.jp # echo $? 75 doveadm index -u u0001 at example.jp INBOX #

I've had squat running on dovecot 2.0 and have been updating all users mailbox indexes nighty via cron with this command: doveadm -v search -A text xyzzyx I've just updated to 2.1 and I'm migrating to lucene indexes, but reading the documentation I'm having a hard time understanding the semantic differences between indexing and rescanning. If I were to continue to run an

Hey guys, When I create a IMAP folder called "php.net" in Thunderbird, a folder called "php" is created with a subfolder called "net", is this a bug in Thunderbird or is it something that I or you can fix? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc:

Hello all, Is there a way to recognize a hot-plugged disk (i.e., to get the system to recognize it and build the appropriate /dev/sd* device for the new device) without a reboot? Thanks. Boris.

Hi, I got few servers (IBM HS20,HS21 blades, IBM xSeries 3650 & others) connected to a dual fabric san throught Qlogic HBA's (23xx, 24xx). Multipathing is done with device-mapper-multipath. On CentOS 4.x i can scan for new scsi devices without any problems, get them up with multipathing & use them without any problems. However, after i started installing CentOS 5.1 (did not

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 19:33:57 +0800, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > Hi > > If you plan to fix the FTS part of Dovecot, I will be very gratefull. I'm trying to figure out what is causing the 3rd issue you listed, so we can decide how severe it is and therefore how quickly it needs to be fixed. At the moment we are unable to reproduce it, and therefore we cannot fix it. >

On 11/04/2015 10:27 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Julius, >> >> Thanks - but it doesn't seem to work. >> >> I installed sg3_utils and ran >> #scsi-rescan >> >> but that seemed to have done nothing for some reason. >> > Dumb question:

Hi! Dovecot 2.2.24 Had set up solr and new schema collection. Copied dovecot provided schema. There was an error with booleans (while getting schema via http), which I "solved" by removing "add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" from solrconfig.xml. It is correct way to solve this? Anyway, I run tcpdump to see network activity between dovecot and solr: #tcpdump -i lo port 8983

I have tried to spend some time of understanding the logic (if any !) of the fts part Honestly, the one who created this mess shall be the one to fix it, or one shall refactor it totally. Basically, the fts "core" should be able to do - select the backend according to conf file - send new emails/maiblox to backend - send teh ID of the emails to be removed - resend an entire

On 7 Jan 2019, at 16.05, Joan Moreau via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hi > > ANyone to answer specifically ? > > Q1 : get_last_uid -> Is this the last UID indexed (which may be not the greatest value), or the gratest value (which may not be the latest) (the code of existing plugins is unclear about this, Solr looks for the greatest for insance) All the

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 17:45:36 +0800, Joan Moreau wrote: > I am on master (very latest) > > No clue exactly when this problem appears, but > > 1 - the "request twice the fts plugin instead of once" issue has always > been there (since my first RC release of fts-xapian) Ok, good to know. > 2 - the body/text loop has appeared recently (maybe during the month

Hi everybody. I have an HP StorageWorks array connected to one of my servers, connected via an LSI controller (lspci reports: SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS (rev 08)) on an HP DL385 running CentOS 5.5 x86_64. I have set up multipath and all is working but, when I create a snaphost and export it as a new LUN from the HP web interface, it