Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[PATCH] fix NTLM2 endianness buglet"
2004 Sep 30
1
[PATCH] NTLM2 support
Hello,
as pointed by Andrew Bartlett NTLM2 authentication support
is missing in dovecot. Attached patch adds it.
Tested and works for me.
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
diff -urpNX /usr/share/dontdiff
2004 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] support OEM encoding in NTLM messages
Hello,
after I started to use dovecot as a backend for exim4 SMTP
authentication on my main mailserver, I noticed that some
clients don't advertise unicode support and so they can't
log in.
To fix the problem the attached patch allows use of OEM encoding
in NTLM messages.
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
P.S. I want to release exim4 patch in the near future, probably
when Timo
2004 Nov 10
0
[PATCH] NTLM update and crashfix
Hello,
attached patch allows LM authentication for older (Win9x) clients
which do not pass NTLM response in type 3 message. It also fixes
crash in dovecot-auth (empty credentials could be passed to
hex_to_binary function if NTLM2 was negotiated).
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
2004 Oct 29
1
[PATCH] yet another NTLM update
Hello,
after more than week using dovecot as exim4 authentication backend,
I noticed that some strange clients send type 3 messages with
LM response only. Attached patch allows them to log in.
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
diff -urdpNX
2004 Oct 07
0
[PATCH] add missing error check in epoll code
Hello,
this patch adds missing epoll_create() error check.
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
diff -urpX /usr/share/dontdiff dovecot-1.0-test46.vanilla/src/lib/ioloop-epoll.c dovecot-1.0-test46/src/lib/ioloop-epoll.c
---
2004 Oct 07
0
[PATCH] change old style SASL discovery code
Hello,
this patch reworks old-style SASL discovery code. With this
patch applied it advertises all configured SASL mechanisms.
It makes possible for MS Outlook to use all installed
security service providers (SSP), so if someone crazy enough
will write CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 SSP we'll support it readily :)
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system
2018 May 14
1
NTLMSSP NTLM2 - Invalid signature
Hello guys.
When checking the Samba status, an error is displayed.
This error was displayed after upgrading from version 4.7.5 to version 4.7.7
I've reviewed everything and found nothing wrong.
Anyone have any idea what it is?
*Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM <http://XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM> samba[14480]:
[2018/05/14 08:54:47.676288, 0]
2012 Dec 17
1
S4 AD Domain Up; but lots of NTLMSSP NTLM2 errors
samba-4.0.0 x86_64, CentOS6.3
My Samba4 / AD is up and running after migrating this weekend. Testing
looked good and the domain *is working* but there are some issues.
My log.samba file is full of the following; I'm not certain of the
significance of these.
[2012/12/17 05:59:09,
0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet)
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid
2015 Dec 07
3
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
HI!
My server Samba 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do not is a
problem, but my i see this messages logs every 1 minutes, any ideas?
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.260707, 0]
../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet)
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check
failed due to invalid signature!
Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux
2015 Dec 09
0
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
> hehehe
> Thank you for your attention.
> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be
> presented here.
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
>
> Application patch, exemple....
4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 don't need any special examples becaus eit is a *bugfix
only* minor
2015 Dec 09
0
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
> Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki?
Wiki?
how did you install samba?
if i installed from a package i would just write a bugreport when my
distribution stays on a x.0 release and when i build my own packages,
well, download tarball, edit the version number in the SPEC-file and
just fire rpmbuild
> Em 09-12-2015 13:47,
2015 Dec 09
0
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
> Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use
> the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2?
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
damned - how did you install it?
[ ] self compiled
[ ] package
[ ] package on what operating system
THERE IS NOTHING to do besides update the
2015 Dec 09
2
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
hehehe
Thank you for your attention.
Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be
presented here.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
Application patch, exemple....
Bye!!
Em 09-12-2015 12:11, L.P.H. van Belle escreveu:
> Sorry none..
>
> I suggest first upgrade to the latest 4.3.x
> If it is still there, post again, but with some
2015 Dec 09
2
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki?
Thanks
Em 09-12-2015 13:47, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
>> hehehe
>> Thank you for your attention.
>> Know if you have a more "easy" to update the 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2 not be
>> presented here.
>>
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
2015 Dec 09
1
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Ok, my installation was build following the official wiki Samba using OS
like Ubuntu 14:04.
Still the question remains how do I update the package?
Following the wiki (I spent in another email) or otherwise?
Thanks
Em 09-12-2015 14:33, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
>> Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the
2015 Dec 09
2
NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
Wiki I am referring to was the link I spent to update the samba, I use
the method described it to upgrade my Samba 4.3.0 -> 4.3.2?
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
Em 09-12-2015 14:07, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
>> Understood, then I follow what's in the Wiki?
>
> Wiki?
> how did you install
2015 Dec 09
1
Fwd: Re: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature
In short, I follow what ja think I was telling to UPGRADE follow the
Wiki(which is was the same as you gave me)
My samba has been updated from version 4.2 to 4.3(used wiki), so said he
was running since August.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Bye
Em 09-12-2015 15:01, Reindl Harald escreveu:
>
>
> Am 09.12.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha:
>> Ok, my installation
2004 Oct 10
1
cvs build broken in auth/db-mysql.c?
After running
./configure --with-ldap --with-ssl=openssl --with-pgsql --with-mysql --without-cyrus-sasl2 --sysconfdir=/etc
(Settings taken from the debian/rules of debian package version 0.99.11-3)
of the cvs HEAD or test46 I get the following error during make:
db-mysql.o(.text+0x116): In function `db_mysql_query':
/tmp/dovecot-1.0-test46/src/auth/db-mysql.c:82: undefined reference to
2009 Apr 03
2
Implementation of editheaders in dovecot
Hello.
I wrote the hook function for deliver. I want to add support of
editheaders in the plug-in for dovecot. For this purpose I wrote the
function rarules_get_stream. Remover of headrs works properly, but
adding does not work. I took Timo Sirainen's advice from http://markmail.org/message/skb6arnll5gaopdr
. Do I use a correct way of creation of a message?
I give backtrace and a
2004 Jul 22
1
[PATCH] add LOGIN authentication mechanism
Hello,
attached patch (1.0-test29) adds LOGIN authentication mechanism.
Tested with KMail and seems working.
Please consider applying.
Best regards.
P.S. I also have NTLM authentication working and plan to
submit it RSN.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke at donpac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
-------------- next part --------------
diff -urpNX /usr/share/dontdiff