similar to: Can't update kernel, says not enough space

I have two workers (ie two files in my RAILS_ROOT/lib/workers directory) on my Rails app. When I run a top on my box, I see *three* processes called packer_worker_r. Shouldn''t I just be having two? What is the third process for? Here is an extract of the output from my top command. The PIDs are 7084, 7085 and 7083. ============================================ PID USER PR NI VIRT

Has anyone seen output like this before? Notice on my /dev/md0 That it reports 100% used, but also 5.3 Gb available. What would cause this? # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 71G 1.6G 66G 3% / /dev/sda1 99M 22M 73M 23% /boot tmpfs 506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm /dev/md0 903G 851G 5.3G 100%

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0617 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0617.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i586.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Manuel Yguel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear llvm developpers, > I followed the tutorial to build llvm and clang provided here: > https://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html > > The sources are in sync with subversion repository, and I ended up with more > than 30GB of binaries in llvm/bin as shown at the end of this

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0617 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0617.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.noarch.rpm kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.x86_64.rpm kernel-largesmp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.x86_64.rpm

Dear llvm developpers, I followed the tutorial to build llvm and clang provided here: https://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html The sources are in sync with subversion repository, and I ended up with more than 30GB of binaries in llvm/bin as shown at the end of this message. I assume I did something wrong, but I did not find any entry in the doc that helps me understand how to reduce the size of

I'm going to bugz this if no one tells me I made another brain-damaged error here. Also, if I can get one confirmation, it'll let me breath easier. I ran a version searching for ".cmd" and ".c" just trying to convince myself I'm not *that* brain-damaged. You'd think after all these years that regex compilation would be pretty darn stable... Oh! Forgot it was

OSes: CentOS 5.0 x86, CentOS 4.5 x86. Hi, I have CentOS 5.0 x86 installed on an IDE HDD. [john at localhost ~]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 224G 8.5G 204G 4% / /dev/hdc1 99M 16M 79M 17% /boot tmpfs 506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm I want to install CentOS 4.5 x86 on

Hi all, I am trying to boot from a HD created as a copy of a running system (and it doesn't work, and I don't understand why ...) This is the system to be copied : File-system Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 2.0G 797M 1.1G 43% / tmpfs 506M 0 506M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda5 4.7G 3.3G 1.2G 74% /var/spool/squid/cache1

Hi all, I am a newbie to linux and this is my first mail to this group. We have a PC running Centos version 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL. I needed to load a router software called Nistnet and it would not run properly. It is looking for RTC (Real Time clock) support as a module. I 've gone through the LKM Loadable Kernel module support under Documentation pages of Linux.org and did the following:

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On 06/08/2017 9:17 AM, Jorge Cimentada wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to install some very heavy packages from Github (~ 100MB - > 300 MB) on my remote server using Rstudio server and I keep getting some > crashes. These packages are pretty much datasets. Based on your description, this is RStudio Server specific. You'll need to write to their tech support for help.

Hi, I've been trying to install some very heavy packages from Github (~ 100MB - 300 MB) on my remote server using Rstudio server and I keep getting some crashes. These packages are pretty much datasets. I try doing it with this code and get the error below. > install.packages("devtools") > devtools::install_github("pbiecek/PISA2000lite") Downloading GitHub repo

Hello, I have a small server running a tool (RT : perl + mysql + apache) for our support team. I stripped down everything else. The OS is CentOS 4.8. I noticed a difference between df and du which is hard to believe : according to df, I am using 29 GB [root at cedrat-rt ~]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 33G 29G 2.8G 92% / none

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0617 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0617.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.ia64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0617 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0617.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.s390x.rpm

Downloaded from http://vault.centos.org/debuginfo/4/i386/ The file I received was 23-Aug-2006 06:18 298M. My ls showed 312932522. I presume this is an approximate match. Validation failed. # rpm --checksig kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL.i686.rpm: sha1 MD5 NOT OK The i586 file validates OK. TIA -- Bill

I received the following error messages in the system logs. Is this anything to be concerned with? kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_populate_inode:234 ERROR: Invalid dinode: i_ino=1293597, i_blkno=1293597, signature = INODE01, flags = 0x0 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:389 ERROR: populate inode failed! i_blkno=1293597, i_ino=1293597 kernel: (4074,0):ocfs2_iget:131 ERROR: status = -116

Hi all, I'm troubleshooting an ocfs2 performance problem where creating files in a directory containing ~180k files is taking significant time to complete. Sometimes creating an empty file will take >100 seconds to complete. This is a three node cluster. I'm currently running OCFS2 1.2.3-1. Are there any changes in a recent version that may address this issue? What should I look

We are in the process of migrating XFS filesystems from one storage array to another. Both are arrays are mounted locally on the same CentOS 4.4 system (x86_64). We are running kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp along with kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp-0.1-3. The issue we are having is that while the copy is running (using rsync) the system will log these message periodically: kernel: XFS: