similar to: "Invalid offset returned by binary tree"

What is the possibility to use the Cortex-M4 DSP instructions to fully optimize the OPUS code? Could we use the ARM CMSIS DSP library for this optimization? Thanks, Heng -----Original Message----- From: opus-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:opus-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of opus-request at xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 2:00 PM To: opus at xiph.orgis Subject: opus Digest, Vol 70,

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:18:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > (II) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] nouveau interface version: 0.0.16 > (EE) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] wrong version, expecting 0.0.15 > (EE) NOUVEAU(0): 879: So I've tried reading the thread and haven't found the answer to this question yet; my apologies for surely missing the answer which is out there. What version of

Hi All, Cortex-M4 is a single issue CPU whereas A8 is dual issue so this is the main reason you are seeing a slow-down, use of NEON I would say is secondary, certainly for CELT. We (ESPICO) have done optimisation work on OPUS v1.1 and have ARM implementations about twice the speed of the 'off the shelf' version. Please contact me directly if you want to discuss further. Cliff

I'm considering implementing Opus as the codec for an embedded ARM-based battery powered audio system. In the interest of battery life and board footprint I'd like to specify the smallest CPU that can do the job. In some quick testing on Cortex-A8 (a very different core, but at least ISA compatible and hopefully fairly similar to M4 for things like cycle counts and code size) I saw

On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 10:57, Stephen Waters wrote: > This bug may interest you: > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=65679 I've updated it... looks like there's a problem with using /var/spool/mail/user for INBOX and subfolder creation/deletion using mbox in ~/Mail. The result is this: Request: A00099 LIST "" INBOX Response: * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/"

Hi all, I've done a bit of searching and haven't seen anybody else coming across this problem yet: I noticed that Dovecot uses the opposite flags for marking messages as deleted and draft to most other MUAs I've seen or used: With PINE, mutt and uw-imapd at least, messages are marked with X-Status 'D' for Deleted, and 'T' for drafT. Dovecot reverses this behaviour,

Hi, there's a regression going from 6.2 to 6.3, where it will panic upon booting the kernel within vm_fault. This problem has been discussed before, but I'm seeing it reliably on a RELENG_6 checkout from 5th of May. It affects multiple (but identical) systems, here's an verbose boot leading to the panic. Please note that 6.2 was running fine on these machines, they also boot

As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following patches: * segfault when user home directory is empty * Proper PAM service name * Make suid work on 2.6 kernels Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a

Hi all, I am having a problem with pam_winbind.so. Is there any documentation that tells exactly what each module with pam_winbind.so does? In other words, what does the auth section do, what does the account section do??? When I try to authenticate, the auth section in login pam seems to pass successfully, but the account section seems to fail. Here is my login module auth required

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is

http://togami.com/~warren/archive/2003/evolution-1.4.4-crash.mbox I suspect that dovecot-0.99.10 is misserving this message in some way that is confusing some IMAP clients. This behavior causes evolution-1.4.4 to segfault, and squirrelmail-1.4.1 to be unable to read the message. The same message served by uw-imapd works works fine in both evolution and squirrelmail.

hi, is this a feature or a bug in conjunction with apple mail. i usually use the feature in imap to not delete the emails, but only mark them as deleted, which is a very usefull feature if you use a emailbox with more people accessing it. Im now trying an SME server installation with dovecot 0.99.10, and when i delete a message, it gets marked as deletet, but as soon as i change the mailbox

All users are gone now, remove the API. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/mips/Kconfig | 1 - arch/mips/jazz/jazzdma.c | 1 - arch/mips/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 6 ------ arch/parisc/Kconfig | 1 - arch/parisc/kernel/pci-dma.c | 6 ------ include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 8 -------- include/linux/dma-noncoherent.h | 10

I've been seeing the Dovecot/SSL/Fedora 1 problem. I have a dovecot server which tends to die at least once a day, with messages like these :- May 24 13:44:44 mail pop3-login: RAND_bytes() failed: error:24064064:random number generator:SSLEAY_RAND_BYTES:PRNG not seeded May 24 13:44:44 mail dovecot: Login process died too early - shutting down I noticed Timo's email about this at:

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ I should have released 0.99.10 already I think.. There's just two annoying problems that I think should be fixed first: - PAM: If user gives a wrong password, dovecot-auth process sleeps for two seconds, blocking everyone else who are trying to authenticate at the time. So using PAM isn't very good idea at the moment. - OpenSSL problems. Are they

I have dovecot set up to run IMAP services without SSL (I have tested many other configurations as well, but this reproduces the problem the simplest). When attempting to connect to the imap server using Entourage for OS X on a mac, I receive the following error: Mail could not be received at this time. The server returned the following error . Dovecot reports a successful login and nothing

Anyone with SSL problems, please try 0.99.10-test4 or included patch. If it fixes it, I'll make it faster by caching the generated keys. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ssl.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 937 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello, I'm having a slight problem with Dovecot (0.99.10-0.rc2, on Debian woody). When using mozilla 1.4, there is an error message from the mailer just after login, but nothing in dovecot logs. "Alert The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: Too long argument.." How could I fix this problem ? Thanks, -- Nico J'ai une panne de

I am running PC-Pine under Windows XP, connecting via SSL to a Dovecot IMAP server (0.99.10-2 under Debian woody). When I open a mail folder (mbox format) in Pine I get the following non-fatal error: [Junk in end of group: pn=undisclosed-recipients al= dn=] A similar error was reported to comp.mail.pine as happening with a Lotus Domino server. Mark Crispin explained it as a server-side bug:

I checked and I do have the openssl-devel rpm installed SuSE 8.2 openssl-devel-0.9.6i-12 openssl-0.9.61-19 dovecot 0.99.10 ./configure --with-ssl-openssl At the end of the configuration it says ssl support == 'no' :(... I was able to get pam support by picking up the pam-devel modules as suggested. But I got stuck here. After reading up a bit on imap, it seems reasonable to have