Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[Fwd: Maildir++ support]"
2007 Oct 15
2
Error: net_connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
I'm using deliver (1.0.5) with Postfix (2.1.6). I made a test for a few
minutes in a moderated busy server. While most mails was delivered, a
lot of them failed with this error:
deliver(userfoo): Oct 15 09:58:31 Error:
net_connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: Resource temporarily
unavailable
Sounds to me something like not enough auth-master to answer every
concurrent deliver.
Any
2007 Mar 17
4
M-Box benchmark
A friend of mine passed me this[1] cause I'm recommending him Dovecot.
My personal experience is very different to the one in that benchmark. I
will appreciate similar links from those of you who had benchmarked
Dovecot against other IMAP servers.
I'm conscious that my personal experience is far to be a objetive
comparison. I switched from UW-Imap/Mbox to Dovecot/Maildir a box with
45k
2007 Oct 03
2
In-site migration from /etc/passwd to LDAP
I'm doing in-site migration of accounts from /etc/passwd to an LDAP
directory. The migration should be progressive (not all users at the
same time).
I'm already able to check mail for accounts in /etc/passwd and accounts
in LDAP.
The problem is with mail delivery. I'm using Postfix + Dovecot-LDA. This
is the error I get with every delivery
--
dovecot: Oct 03 00:16:09 Info:
2006 Nov 16
2
maildirsize update error
According to [1], Trash is a reserverd folder name. When moving a
message to it, maildirsize should be update with a negative byte count.
If I move a message from any folder to Trash, maildirsize gets two
lines, one positive and one negative.
The problem is that a user can't move messages to Trash while being
overquota because the positive entry goes before the negative.
I'm using
2008 Nov 18
1
Disconnecting without unbinding?
Timo
Please have a look at this short thread[1]. That message stops appearing
whenever I shutdown dovecot.
I'm using dovecot 1.0.15.
dovecot-ldap.conf
-----------------
dn = ...
dnpass = ...
ldap_version = 3
auth_bind = no
base = ...
pass_filter = ...
pass_attrs = ...
user_filter = ...
user_attrs = ...
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_global_uid = vmail
user_global_gid = vmail
Regards,
2006 Dec 19
1
Custom mail directory with LDAP
For certain users, I have their mail boxes
under /srv/mpop/<username>/Maildir. For the rest, I have their mail
boxes under /srv/vmail/<username>/Maildir.
mpop/ users are stored in LDAP, vmail/ users are local users so I
discard the idea of set a fixed mail_location.
In dovecot-ldap.conf I can't get the picture to
set /srv/mpop/<username>/Maildir as mail.
I'd tried
2007 Mar 05
1
Plugins in Python?
Timo
Do you have plans of adding support for writing plugins in high level
languages like Python?
Regards
maykel
2007 Oct 17
1
Per-user quota (with local users)
I'm migrating to LDAP mi local users, there is the auth section of my
dovecot.conf
--
auth default {
mechanisms = plain
socket listen {
master {
path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
mode = 0660
user = dovecot
group = nusers
}
}
passdb ldap {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf
}
passdb pam {
}
userdb ldap {
args =
2008 Jan 05
1
Problems with AUTH=PLAIN in pop3
I'm using Dovecot (1.0.10) locally to test SugarCRM. When I tried to set
up a mail account in Sugar, it complains with
--
SECURITY PROBLEM: insecure server advertised AUTH=PLAIN
Please check your settings and try again.
--
don't know if that behaviour is a bug or a feature of php-imap. The case
is that I'm unable to set up the mail account in Sugar.
Timo answered to me on IRC about
2015 Aug 23
3
Shortcomings of Maildir++ layout
Hi,
I am trying to deal with the problem, that under regular mbox format a
path can lead to either a file or a directory, but not both, while under
IMAP, a path is usually both, a message folder containing subfolders.
I found dovecot's approach to this problem, the Maildir++ layout
described under http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MboxChildFolders , and was
astonished to see, what problems come with
2009 Jun 06
1
LAYOUT=fs vs LAYOUT=maildir++ and quota
Hi everyone.
I'm confused about LAYOUT=fs...
Does using LAYOUT=fs breaks maildir++ quota, if I use this quota scheme?
What are the advantages anyway of using LAYOUT=fs vs LAYOUT=maildir++ ?
(it's not important in my case if users can't create folders with dots '.')
Thanks in advance,
Ezequiel
2006 Aug 11
3
Dovecot - Issue with Maildir++ quotas
Hi,
I've been bitten by an issue running Squirrelmail on top of Dovecot
using Maildir++ quotas.
Having configured these quotas in Dovecot, I notice that Dovecot
appears not to exclude the 'Trash' folder from its quota calculation
(which it should do, according to the Maildir++ spec). Unfortunately
this breaks Squirrelmail if I try to delete a message from a
close-to-quota
2019 May 13
2
Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++: maildir_name not supported by this driver
I have this default configuration [0], when use the userdb_mail to point
to the mdbox location, the inbox subfolders show differently in a
firebird client. So I decided to copy the whole default mail_location
into the userdb_mail configuration [2]. But then I get errors [3].
Should I change the namespace configuration here, how? My default
namespaces are inbox and 4archives
[0]
[@ ]#
2019 May 14
2
Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++: maildir_name not supported by this driver
Yes, I have still inbox mbox format because I have sendmail delivering
there. I trying to migrate/convert
step by step, with least possible impact for users.
-----Original Message-----
From: Aki Tuomi
Sent: dinsdag 14 mei 2019 6:19
To: Marc Roos; Marc Roos via dovecot
Subject: Re: Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++:
maildir_name not supported by this driver
> On
2010 Sep 06
1
LAYOUT=maildir++ under mbox?
Whilst documenting LAYOUT=maildir++ under dbox, that got me thinking:
Can we specify :LAYOUT=maildir++ with mbox?
If I have it right, this should then remove the problem of not being
able to have messages and mail subfolders in the same mail folder.
So for example if we had mail location specified as:
mail_location = mbox:~/mail:LAYOUT=maildir++
we would have files:
~/mail/inbox - file
2019 May 14
1
Userdb userdb_mail=, error Mailbox list driver maildir++: maildir_name not supported by this driver
With this setting, all folders are empty, I guess understandable,
because the mdbox has its own indexes stored locally with it. Does not
explain though why inbox is empty.
[@ dovecot]# cat special-userdb
test:x:8267:231:Account with special settings for
dovecot:/home/popusers/test:/bin/false:userdb_mail=mdbox:~/mdbox:INBOX=/
var/spool/mail/%u:INDEX=/var/dovecot/%u/index
With this setting
2015 Nov 18
2
Shortcomings of Maildir++ layout
> Sounds more like you just introduced a new self-created problem that
would require yet another workaround.. ;-)
Definitely wrong.
Appending .dir to directories and .folder to folder files keeps files
completely distinct and name collissions are not possible.
> But what was not clear from your mail, is what exactly you identified
as "the problems" with standard Maildir++
2006 Jul 14
2
maildir++ specification compliance.
Hi folks.
I was doing some testing this morning and realized Dovecot RC2 isn't fully
compliant with the maildir++ specification.
Most notably, it appears that Dovecot isn't creating a "maildirfolder"
file (0 byte length) in folders it creates.
>From http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html
"Within each subdirectory there's an empty file,
2008 Oct 06
2
Maildir++ problem
Hi to all,
I am semi-new to the dovecot system, but i like it very much for the
versatility of all the system. I have a problem: i am migrating my
servers from postfix with vda patch + courier imap to dovecot. All works
fine, except for one thing: i use Maildir++ format, but i don't know how
to make the file maildirsize into the home of the users. This file is
needed by me becouse i have a
2006 Aug 31
2
Maildir++ quota inconsistency
I've found what I think is an inconsistency in the Maildir quota
implementation. According to the Maildir++ quota specification at:
http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html
Maildir++ quota can be specified as maximum size, or maximum number of
messages, or even both. The size specification is supposed to be in bytes.
So I could use '10000000S' to set a quota of