similar to: index file regeneration?

Is there an easy way/utility to determine the version of samba a particular linux server is running? Paul

# cat /proc/version Linux version 2.4.20-18.9 (bhcompile at daffy.perf.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)) #1 Thu May 29 07:09:43 EDT 2003 # dovecot --version 0.99.10 I've just recently noticed a serious problem with my system. After about an hour or so I get errors in /var/log/maillog such as this; Sep 21 06:40:16 the-system imap(ray): opendir() failed with file

Hello, I'm in the process of migrating 0.99 dovecot maildir boxes to a pair of new machine. These servers were running the stable (etch) 1.0rc15 package of dovecot until yesterday and existing .customflags files were correctly converted to dovecot-keywords. Yesterday I upgraded to the (finally, thanks to who did this) 1.0.0 etch backports package and since then freshly migrated boxes get

Hello, after switching from version 2.2.7 to 2.2.7 I miss the loglines which say: ssl-params: Generating SSL parameters ssl-params: SSL parameters regeneration completed The configuration has not been changed and reads: | # 2.2.7: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf | # OS: Linux 2.6.35.14-106.fc14.i686.PAE i686 Fedora release 14 (Laughlin) ext3 | auth_mechanisms = plain login |

Hi! I want to upgrade a Dovecot installation from 0.99.14 to 1.1.15, so I had a look at the following wiki article: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading?action=show&redirect=UpgradingDovecot The article http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.0 says something about .customflags -> dovecot-keywords and .subscriptions -> subscriptions change/conversion:

Hello, i just switched from courier-imap to dovecot on a machine. The transition was painless except for one issue - when using the "Check mail" feature of kmail, one gets the message: "Unable to get information about folder customflags. The server replied: internal error..." So it looks like the server isn't properly hiding the .customflags file for some reason. I

OK. After checking the 0.99->1.0 migration documentation, it seems I've been a little confused between customflags and keywords. (Though this is partly due to my repeated requests for clarification being ignored.) The page (http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/UpgradingDovecot) says 1.0 does not use .customflags any more. Now, I'm hoping they're still supported, in which case

Hi, I upgraded to test65 from 0.99 (mostly to get the namespace feature) and now it seems my .subscriptions and .customflags are showing up as mail folders in my IMAP client (Eudora). If I try and open those folders, of course I get an error. How can I configure dovecot so that these aren't displayed to my IMAP client? I looked through about 6 months of acrhives and couldn't find

On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > Some analyses, like Andersen's AA, do all their computation in their > runOnFunction(). Therefore, anything they depended on can be > destroyed after the runOnFunction() returns. What about AA itself? Would addRequired<AliasAnalysis> keep AliasAnalysis alive (but allow AliasAnalysis's dependencies to die)? >

On Fri Apr 02 00:37:03 +0200 2010, Trevor Harmon wrote: > On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > > Others, like MemoryDependenceAnalysis, are "lazy." MDA > > specifically does NOT compute results in its runOnFunction(), > > instead computing results on-demand when a user queries it. Because > > MDA depends on AA, we must ensure that, as long as

although basically hopeful of the company''s ''rough cuts'' venture, i am insulted by the fact that o''reilly''s safari service offers important material to its regular subscribers only if they pay extra for it. o''reilly''s material on ajax is a good example: all of the introductory coverage is available only as pricey ''rough

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ Maildir syncing now works pretty much as described in my earlier mail. It was quite a large change, so please test this :) So the new and great features: - It's faster. - If someone renames maildir file just before we try to use it, we now resync the maildir and try to find it again. Before we just failed. It's also possible that the filename changed

Hi list, I have a shorewall installed on 2 interfaces which also has multiple static public IP. Let''s say I have 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5. I have assigned nat with: 1.2.3.4 eth0 11.22.33.4 no no But then I have a situation where I need 11.22.33.44 to connect to a host in the net zone and appears also to be 1.2.3.5 not only 1.2.3.4. How to do it? TIA Willy

Not sure if this is old news or not, but it would appear that both the Ruby Cookbook and a Rails book are now available for purchase at O''Reilly Rough Cuts (something akin to PragProg''s beta book program): http://rubyurl.com/nHz http://my.safaribooksonline.com/?mode=roughcuts&srchtext=ROUGHCUTS I haven''t tried them yet, but it definitely seems worth checking out.

I''m happy to announce the availability of RJS Templates for Rails published by O''Reilly. The book covers all aspects and features of RJS that are included in Rails 1.1. It also walks through a few examples, debugging with FireBug, and finishes off with some reference material. The book is 56 pages and is available in PDF format. I''m really happy with how the book has

Hi, Since updating to 2.3.1 on my FreeBSD mailserver mail delivery using lda is broken if I have sieve enabled. (Before updating this was 2.2 and pigeonhole 0.4) FreeBSD 11.1-p8 amd64 Dovecot 2.3.1 Pigeonhole 0.5.1 Mailflow is OpenSMTPd as MTA, using mda delivery to rspamc which utlimately delivers using dovecot-lda. smtpd.conf deliver to mda "rspamc -h scan --mime -e

Hi, I am upgrading a setup from Dovecot 0.99 to 1.1. There are a bunch of .imap.index* files that it appears that I can just delete, and they will be recreated as dovecot.index* files. Right? Next, there are some .customflags that I have now learned are not being converted to dovecot-keywords (as we skipped the 1.0 version, and the conversion code appears to be removed in 1.1). Is there some way

I'm wondering what I'd need to do to get the "important" flag set on an incoming message according to a pre-specified header. I know the problem of this not being a "joined-up" feature in standard email, but in practice many MUAs set headers like X-priority etc, and IMAP has an "important" flag that is the obvious mapping. I'm not really sure where

Congrats David!!! Very cool. Erik Begin forwarded message: > From: "O''Reilly Media" <ormadmin at oreilly.com> > Date: March 30, 2007 6:22:36 PM EDT > To: erik at ehatchersolutions.com > Subject: New Short Cut: Ferret > > ***New from the O''Reilly Store*** > > Ferret > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9780596527853 > > By David

Hi list, I am trying to build an email system that is using multiple frontends, to a clustered backend using nfs. The backend mounts his filesystems from a central storage, and will be running active-active. While reading through the dovecot documentation, I read that I could do without indexes (well: use memory indexes), and could then be able to run dovecot over NFS. Well: that was until