similar to: Dovecot on Redhat GFS

Hi, I'm playing with Dovecot in a lab environment and got it in state where it crashes on every incoming connection. I moved mail spool from ext2 file system to a ReiserFS on a another disk, mount point changed from /var/vmail to /spool/vmail. After that I managed to open mailbox and I moved about 2000 messages from INBOX to a subfolder. Then I tried to open mailbox with POP3 and it

Hello, Has anyone succeeded on configuring and compiling Sieve capable Dovecot LDA on RHEL 4 x86_64 platform? I am having problems with configure script hanging on sed while creating Makefiles. # ./configure --with-dovecot=../dovecot .. checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking for library containing

Hello All, We are using Dovecot 1.1.3 to serve IMAP on a pair of clustered Postfix servers which share a fiber array via the GFS clustered filesystem. This all works very well for the most part, with the exception that certain operations are so inefficient on GFS that they generate significant I/O load and hurt performance. We are using the Maildir format on disk. We're also using

Hi guys, I'm looking at the possibility of running a pair of servers with Dovecot LDA/imap/pop3 using internal drives with DRBD and GFS (or other clustered FS) for the mail storage and ext3 for the root drive. I'm currently using maildrop for delivery and Dovecot imap/pop3 with the stores over NFS. I'm looking for better performance but still keeping the HA element I have now with

Hello, I'm running an Debian etch box with unstable and ever since the last upgrade to dovecot, I've seen odd things. At times, I would see emails would go missing from the Inbox or other folders, and I couldn't move emails that were moved from the Inbox to another folder back into the Inbox. These have seen gone away since I removed all dovecot.* files and .index* files from my

Hi all, I'm wondering if I'm running into some dependency issues on my CentOS5 test-machines. I've installed with a fairly minimal package set, updated, removed old kernels and am now experimenting with iscsi and gfs. I think I need kmod-gfs to get gfs -support, but there is only a version that suits the base-kernel, 2.6.18-8.el5. " [root at node02 ~]# yum install kmod-gfs

http://dovecot.org/test/ I think this release should be quite stable one. - fixes parsing mails with header lines longer than 8192 bytes - cache file corruption fixes - fixed "corrupted offset in mbox file" errors - don't return extra INBOX replies in LIST Those mbox and cache problems were pretty tricky to figure out. Thanks to Tomi Hakala for tons of testing while I tried to

I am considering building a pair of storage servers that will be using CentOS and GFS to share the storage from a Coraid (SATA+Raid) EtherDrive shelf. Has anyone else tried such a setup? Is GFS stable enough to use in a production environment? There is a build of GFS 6.1 at http://rpm.karan.org/el4/csgfs/. Has anyone used this? Is it stable? Will I run into any problems if I use CentOS 3.5

Thanks to John Newbigin the new GFS packages for the 2.4.21-57.EL kernel are now available. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0259.html i386: csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-modules-6.0.2.36-8.i386.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm csgfs/i386/RPMS/GFS-devel-6.0.2.36-8.i686.rpm

Hello, We have two Fedora 5 Servers clustered with GFS. We installed samba and exported the same shares in both of them. All went fine at first, with people accessing to theirs own files and so, but for some programs (minitab, matlab, ...) people need to access the same file at once. Then samba begins to fail and clients hang. In order to fix samba is necessary to restart the service.

Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module format arising from version magic issues. The syslog shows: node0 kernel: gfs: version magic '2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp SMP 686 REGPARM

Hi, I am using this document along with the following links to try and assemble a GFS set of mahcines: 1. Log on as the root user. 2. Run up2date --installall --channel Label for Red Hat Cluster Suite. The following example shows running the command for i386 RPMs: # up2date --installall --channel rhel-i386-as-4-cluster 3. (Optional) If you are

GFS 6.0.2-12 is now available for CentOS-3. This version has some small fixes is but is mostly just to support the new CentOS-3 kernel. The files are available from my site here: http://bender.it.swin.edu.au/centos-3/RHGFS/ Tips for updating: Because the dependencies are a bit screwed (thanks to RH), it is probably easiest to do rpm -U

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1234 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1234.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f20302719dd6cedf4615a4bbbe171b20047aa0b022c897aaeb8e5b4c17d7ace6 kmod-gfs-0.1.34-22.el5.centos.i686.rpm

HI, Sorry for repeating same mail ,while composing that mail i mistakenly typed the send button.I am facing problem with my gfs and below is the running setup. My setup Two node Cluster[only to create shared gfs file system] with manual fencing running on centos 4 update 5 for oracle apps. Shared gfs partition are mounted on both the node[active-active] Whenever i type df -h command it

Announcing CentOS 3 i386 Cluster Suite (CS) and Global File System (GFS) CentOS csgfs is now available for CentOS-3 i386. This is a built from source found here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHCS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/3/en/RHGFS/i386/SRPMS/ ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/3AS/en/RHCS/SRPMS/

Hi, I have configured two machines for testing gfs filesystems. They are attached to a iscsi device and centos versions are: CentOS release 5.4 (Final) Linux node1.fib.upc.es 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 3 03:33:56 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux The problem is if I try to mount a gfs partition it hangs. [root at node2 ~]# cman_tool status Version: 6.2.0 Config Version: 29 Cluster Name:

Hi all, Since I've got no reply on redhat cluster list, I'm trying here ... I'm testing a rhcs4 cluster with gfs. I noticed some poor performance while tarring data from a gfs volume to a local disk from both nodes at the same time, so I deceided to have a closer look. Here are the bonnie++ results: http://jure.pecar.org/gfs/ I don't know what to think of these ... but I doubt

Hello list I've installed cluster suite with 8 physical nodes, these are connected to a SAN using CLVM and AOE protocol. The cluster suite runs on the physical nodes/servers, in dom0. If I have to use GFS, where do I install this? What is the right approach to using GFS with Xen. I see 2 options: 1. I install GFS inside each domU (unprivileged domain, the actual VM). 2. I install GFS on

I'm planning some new mysql database servers and I've had problems with LVM in the past with snapshots. I've had advice from someone from MySQL AB to try out GFS because it's snapshotting is supposed not to be broken. Looking at some of the GFS documentation on Redhat.com makes it look like GFS might be or might not be a simple replacement if I'm just mounting it locally,