similar to: Shared folders?

I just upgraded to Fedora Core 2 from Fedora Core 1. Discovered that UW-IMAP was replaced with Cyrus. Not quite ready to switch to that mail box format so I instead installed dovecot which comes with Fedora Core 2. The RPM version is: dovecot-0.99.10.4-4 The problem I am having is that it seems to want to put folders in: ~/mail/mail/ I would like the folders to be in: ~/mail/ Currently in

Hi, Does anybody have a good tip of how to treat bimodal data to perform statistical analyses? My data set ranges from -1 to 1 (any values are posssible in between) and most data are either close to -1 or close to 1. They are the results of a two choice experiment where individuals could choose more than once in either direction and scores were calculated. Simone Simone Immler

I'd really like an option "noprivate" or somesuch within the 'authentication' specification which would not require a password for listener requests originating from a private network (192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x or 172.16.x.x, etc ). Is this posssible? -- ************************************************************************ * Dave Serls

Does anyone have advice or pointers on good documentation on how to convert a system from using the Mbox format to using Maildir? I recently upgraded to Fedora Core 2 from Fedora Core 1 and discovered that UW-IMAP was gone. So I switched over to using Dovecot. So far so good. But I would like to convert my system to start using the Maildir format. How easy is this to accomplish? Can I keep

Hello, Does anyone know if it is posssible to insert a picture (ps or jpg for example) in documentation files with Rd extension. I guess it's impossible but maybe there is a trick. Thank you! Eric Esposito ================================== Direction de la Recherche P??le Economie, Statistisques et Sociologie 361 avenue du Pr??sident Wilson - BP 33 93211 Saint-Denis La Plaine cedex

Hi, ext3-0.0.5d.tar.gz is now up on ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ as patches against 2.2.18. This only contains the kernel bits: we're in the process of syncing up on some e2fsprogs so I'll do another release shortly once we've got all of the pending changes for the user-mode tools assembled. This release is mostly

Hi R Helpers, I'm still new to R and i experience many difficulties..I'm using vegan package (R version 2.11) trying to calculate checkerboard units for each species pair of a matrix. I've prepared the function: pair.checker=function (dataset) {designdist (dataset, method="c("(A-J)x(B-J)", terms ="binary", abcd=FALSE)} to use with function oecosimu as

I've been looking at inlining invokes / calls done through statepoints and I want to have a design discussion before I sink too much time into something I'll have to throw away. I'm not actively working on adding inlining support to patchpoints, but I suspect these issues are applicable towards teaching LLVM to inline through patchpoints as well. There are two distinct problems to

hi, we've got (and getting more) serious problem with load. I'm just calculate that ther is about 300 mailbox with 20Gb mails. and the whole system is _very_ slow and just getting slower and slower. it's a fast lan every client has 100Mb connection to the server with gigabit crad and gigabit switches. when I push the delete button in a mail I usualy have to wait 10,20 or 30

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was

So is there any possibility of getting it so that the Subversion repository can get the check-in comments from the internal CVS repository? At the moment every log file comment I see in SVN is "Sync". Which doesn't really let me know what has happenned without having to go lock at the actual diff between the two versions. And even then I may not have any idea why the change was

I ran into a problem where systems without DNS entries could not connect to the rsync server with the IPV6 patch applied. Here is a fix to the problem. Basically they were checking the list of IP addresses returned by getaddr even if getaddr failed. I just changed it so they only check the list of IP addresses if getaddr succeeds. Any comments on this please email me directly because I do not

Another simple question. How do I calculate the size of the volume from the superblock? Do I just use the two fields: u_int32_t s_blocksize_bits; /* Blocksize for this fs */ u_int32_t s_clustersize_bits; /* Clustersize for this fs */ What is the formula to use? Thanks, John

Just a quick question. What is the maximum and minimum volume sizes that OCFS2 supports? I'm working on doing a plugin for EVMS to support OCFS2. One of the functions needs that info. Thanks, John

I also sent this to OCFS2-devel but no response so far. So... I noticed that OCFS2 got updated in the last few days. I just tried to do a build and got this: [root@linuxjohn2 trunk]# make make -C src make[1]: Entering directory `/root/ocfs2/trunk/src' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `inc/io.h', needed by `alloc.c'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/ocfs2/trunk/src'

Quick question: Say i have a few shopping sites that i want to run on the same application code but have seperate databases and layout/design, what would be the neatest ''Rails'' way of doing this? Cheers, Steve

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ Maildir syncing now works pretty much as described in my earlier mail. It was quite a large change, so please test this :) So the new and great features: - It's faster. - If someone renames maildir file just before we try to use it, we now resync the maildir and try to find it again. Before we just failed. It's also possible that the filename changed

Hi list I'm trying to set up shared public folders with individual SEEN flags. I've set up three test users, but as soon as one of them marks a mail in the public folder as seen or unseen, that change is propagated to all three users. If I watch the dovecot.index.log file in each user's directory for the public folder, I see all three change their last access time as soon as one user

The long term plan is a) evolving, and b) dependent on the specific use case. :) It would definitely be nice if we could support both early and late safepoint insertion. I see no reason that LLVM as a project should pick one or the other since the infrastructure required is largely overlapping. (Obviously, I'm going to be mostly working on the parts that I need, but others are always

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ Again major maildir syncing updates: - uidlist file is accessed and rewritten a lot less often now than before - mail duplicates are detected and handled properly by renaming them to new base name - message flag updates and expunging before did two full syncs for cur/ directory. now it does only one. - some fixes to syncing in read-only / out-of-quota