Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "disconnected errors"
2003 Nov 02
2
dies on start-up: Auth process
I was digging through some of the archives and ran into someone who was
having the same problem, but for completely different reasons....i think.
dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:51 Info: Dovecot starting up
dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: Auth process died too early - shutting down
dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27673 (login) killed with signal 11
dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27672 (login)
2012 Feb 28
4
JIRA anyone?
I''m trying to evaluate what use I can make of JIRA with Rails/Ruby and am
getting frustrated.
The jira4r gem will install but the soap4r gem won''t load.
literally: ''irb -r soap4r'' returns :cannot load such file...
I also set this up in a Gemfile and tried to run this from the rails
console:
2020 Jul 10
3
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Moving (parts of) the Cling REPL in Clang
Hi Richard,
On 7/10/20 11:10 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> Hi Vassil,
>
> This is a very exciting proposal that I can imagine bringing important
> benefits to the existing cling users and also to the clang user and
> developer community. Thank you for all the work you and your team have
> done on cling so far and for offering to bring that work under the
> LLVM umbrella!
2020 Jul 10
3
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Moving (parts of) the Cling REPL in Clang
On 7/10/20 1:57 PM, Vassil Vassilev wrote:
> On 7/10/20 6:43 AM, JF Bastien wrote:
>> I like cling, and having it integrated with the rest of the project
>> would be neat. I agree with Hal’s suggestion to explain the design of
>> what remains. It sounds like a pretty small amount of code.
>
>
> JF, Hal, did you mean you want a design document of how cling in
>
2020 Jul 10
4
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Moving (parts of) the Cling REPL in Clang
I like cling, and having it integrated with the rest of the project would be neat. I agree with Hal’s suggestion to explain the design of what remains. It sounds like a pretty small amount of code.
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 7:25 PM, Hal Finkel via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I think that it would be great to have infrastructure for incremental C++ compilation,
2020 Jul 09
5
[RFC] Moving (parts of) the Cling REPL in Clang
Motivation
===
Over the last decade we have developed an interactive, interpretative
C++ (aka REPL) as part of the high-energy physics (HEP) data analysis
project -- ROOT [1-2]. We invested a significant effort to replace the
CINT C++ interpreter with a newly implemented REPL based on llvm --
cling [3]. The cling infrastructure is a core component of the data
analysis framework of ROOT and
2004 Jul 21
2
imap support question
OK, I'm actually trying to write something which interacts with IMAP.
I'm trying to run the FETCH command and it goes OK, but I'm wondering
how I might be able to call both RFC822.SIZE and BODY[HEADERS.FIELDS(..)
in the same call. Right now I'm only able to get this to work with two
calls to the server. I was hoping to avoid making two calls.
Any suggestions?
(I realize it
2019 Apr 10
4
Feasibility of cling/llvm interpreter for JIT replacement
Dear Sir/Madam
Our company, 4Js software, has developed an SQL data base software that
runs under different operating systems: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X. This
software compiles each SQL statement into a C program that is compiled
"on the fly" and executed by our JIT, Just In Time compiler.
We wanted to port it to Apple's iOS, and spent a lot of time
retargetting the JIT for
2006 Aug 08
3
"undo" a model
In the event that I really don''t want a certain model, can I delete it?
Is there a tool that I can use besides ''rm'' to ensure I hit everything
related to the model?
Right now my only guess is to just remove all files that match a
filemask and hope for the best.
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and recursive finalization
Hi,
I ran into a problem migrating cling (finally!) to MCJIT: When an
("outer") MCJIT's finalization /
llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols() is called and a symbol
is not known, cling can help by loading the suitable library and
providing the symbol.
It compiles the relevant C++ header as part of loading the library. This
compilation emits symbols through the MCJIT. That
2014 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] problems to recompile LLVM version 3.4.1 with gcc48 / SuSE 13.1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:57:46AM +0200, Armin Steinhoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> first problem was:
>
> >FileManager.cpp:311:21: error: range-based for loops are not allowed
> >in C++98 mode
> >for (auto & fe: SeenFileEntries) {
> >^
> >FileManager.cpp:312:14: error: request for member getValue in fe,
> >which is of non-class type int
2017 Nov 14
1
OrcJIT + CUDA Prototype for Cling
Hi Lang,
thank You very much. I've used Your code and the creating of the object
file works. I think the problem is after creating the object file. When
I link the object file with ld I get an executable, which is working right.
After changing the clang and llvm libraries from the package control
version (.deb) to a own compiled version with debug options, I get an
assert() fault.
In
void
2017 Sep 27
2
OrcJIT + CUDA Prototype for Cling
Dear LLVM-Developers and Vinod Grover,
we are trying to extend the cling C++ interpreter
(https://github.com/root-project/cling) with CUDA functionality for
Nvidia GPUs.
I already developed a prototype based on OrcJIT and am seeking for
feedback. I am currently a stuck with a runtime issue, on which my
interpreter prototype fails to execute kernels with a CUDA runtime error.
=== How to use the
2004 Jun 11
2
auth failure
well, with some help I've made a fair amount of progress on my box.
It's working out much easier than I had anticipated and perhaps my notes
will be useful some day.
I have two questions...
Here is where I am:
cling:~# egrep -v "^($|\#)" /etc/dovecot.conf
protocols = imap imaps
login = imap
login_max_processes_count = 16
login = pop3
max_mail_processes = 512
2008 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote:
>>> Since I think it really is a part of the LLVM internals, I don't
>>> think
>>> that mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would
>>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally
>>> detrimental.
>>
2006 Jan 16
1
in a major jam... authentication
I was upgrading my debian box and managed to upgrade my dovecot
installation at the same time. I wasn't planning on it, but it came
along just the same.
I took some notes on what I thought I needed to change, but apparently
it wasn't enough.
I've been running this for quite some time now with pgsql authentication
and it's been one of those nice applications that always
2009 Dec 17
3
[LLVMdev] Compiling a raw binary with llvm/clang
Indeed ld does link it. The reason I am using llvm-ld, is for its unique
functionality.
I intend to link to object files together (created by cling), and link them
with llvm-ld.
The main feature that I am currently interested in is the ability to have
"inline functions" between two object files. This was basically impossible
with gcc.
Is there any way to make the raw binary with llvm?
2020 Jul 10
0
[cfe-dev] [RFC] Moving (parts of) the Cling REPL in Clang
I do not know enough about cling, but I like what you describe very much, am particularly intrigued about how your approach could also be appropriated to do ahead-of-time constexpr metaprogramming as well, which also involves incrementally adding declarations to the translation unit.
Dave
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 11:43 PM, JF Bastien via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
2013 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] how to check out revision 165095
Hello:
I am told that compile cling, from CERN, I need revision 165095. HOW do I check out that version? When going through the /tags directory, all version are 17xxxx.
I tried svn checkout -r 165095 http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx llvm
but it will not work with either /truck or /tags
I tried svn checkout http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at 165095, but that also doen't work
2015 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] MCJIT handling of linkonce_odr
Hi,
I'm finally moving cling to MCJIT - and MCJIT is wonderful! So far I
only ran into this issue:
$ cat linkonceodr.cxx
extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
template <class T> struct StaticStuff {
static T s_data;
};
template <class T> T StaticStuff<T>::s_data = 42;
int compareAddr(int* mcjit);
#ifdef BUILD_SHARED
int compareAddr(int* mcjit) {
if (mcjit