similar to: Help: RH9 upgrade (mbox)

Thinking about going from mbox to maildir. Started with mbox way back when but thinking about making the conversion. The main reason is that I use rsync for backups and when these huge mailboxes are touched I have to copy the whole thing. With maildir I only copy the files that change. So - my questions is - what's the easiest way to make this happan. I assume there are conversion

On this wiki page http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/UW appears this information: "It's possible to keep using the .mailboxlist}} filename (as long as it's in the same directory) by modifying {{{SUBSCRIPTION_FILE_NAME define in src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-storage.h" However, if a user wanted to continue using .mailboxlist wouldn't they also have to change the

Hi, I am running dovecot 0.99-14 on a Fedora Core 2 machine. I had a few questions: 1) I wanted to upgrade to the dovecot-1.0 release. However, I am not sure if that's really required. dovecot-0.99-14 has been running very well for me for quite some time. Is there a real advantage to switching to the latest release. The reason I'm asking this is because: i) I don't have too

Hello! I am running a site that has two servers, 10 000 users in both, Solaris 9 and home directories with mbox mailboxes shared with NFS. Indexes are kept separately in both server, on local disks, both servers are serving imap (from NFS mboxes). We are trying to convert from uw-imap to dovecot. Servers are currently running on their limits and now i have mysterious problems with

I've mostly finished a conversion from an old Centos 3 UW-Imap server to a new Centos 6 dovecot server. I did not copy the old ~/.mailboxlist file to ~/mail/.subscriptions file, but notice some users have the latter file now. These are all mbox folders on the old and new server. I'm getting ready to do the same to another old/new pair of servers and I'm wondering if there is an

I'm hoping to get some "best practice" feedback for constructing a function call which takes an undefined set of DIFFERENT length vectors -- e.g. say we have two lists: list1=c(1:10) list2=c(2:4) lists = data.frame(list1,list2) coerces those two to be the same length (recycling list2 to fill in the missing rows) -- what is a quick way of having each of those lists retain their

Background: We are a UW-IMAP shop, using mbox format. (!) We are in the process of upgrading to Dovecot, hopefully to 1.0 proper. :) One of the modifications we have been using in test versions of Dovecot involve the move of the user subscription file from: IMAP-root/.subscriptions to: $HOME/.mailboxlist Rather than having to make changes to Dovecot source code each time a new release

Hello, we like to use dovecot, but our old imapd used to store the paths of the folder in the file ~/.mailboxlist. This file contains something like this: mail/read mail/dovecot .netscape/imap/mailbox .Mail/foo Each line with a path to one mbox folder. And please pay attention that there is no path to the inbox, because this is stored on the server... Is there a way to use this

I am experimenting with some of the common r functions. I had a question re:using "gsub" (or some similar functions) on the contents of a list. I want to design a function that looks at "everything" contained din a list, and anytime it finds the text string "pattern" replace it with "x". I also wish to preserve the "structure" of the original

Dear R users, A co-worker and I are writing a function to facilitate graph plotting in R. The function makes use of a lot of lists in its defaults. However, we discovered that R does not necessarily preserve the defaults if we were to input them in the form of list() when initializing the function. For example, if you feed the function codes below into R: myfunction=function( list1=list

Im working on upgrading to dovecot-1.0.7 from version 1.0.3 which I installed using yum. I backed up my init.d stuff so everything still works. However, when I shutdown my old dovecot version and start the new, I get an empty mailbox when logging into mail. My current config for dovecot.conf on version 1.0.3 has this for my mailbox location:mail_location = mbox:~/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u

Hi R users: I got this code to generate a graphic for each member of a lists. list1<-list(A=data.frame(x=c(1,2),y=c(5,6)),B=data.frame(x=c(8,9),y=c(12,6))) names1<-names(list1) sapply(1:length(list1),function(i) with(list1[[i]],plot(x,y,type="l",main=paste("Graphic of",names1[i])))) Is there a more elegant solution for not to use two separate lists? I would like to

Hi, This has bugged me for a bit. First question is how to keep classes with rbind, and second question is how to properly return vecotrs instead of lists after turning an rbind of lists into a data.frame list1=list(a=2, b=as.Date("20090102", format="%Y%m%d")) list2=list(a=2, b=as.Date("20090102", format="%Y%m%d")) rbind(list1, list2) #this loses the

HI Eliza, You could do this: set.seed(15) mat1<-matrix(sample(1:800,124*12,replace=TRUE),nrow=12) # smaller dataset #Your codes ?list1<-list() ?for(i in 1:ncol(mat1)){ ? list1[[i]]<-t(apply(mat1,1,function(x) x[i]-x)) ? list1} ?x<-list1?? x<-matrix(unlist(x),nrow=12) x<-abs(x) ?y<-colSums(x, na.rm=FALSE) z<-matrix(y,ncol=10) ?z<-as.dist(z) ?z ?# ?? 1?? 2?? 3?? 4?? 5??

I have the following code: list1 <- list() for (i in list.files(pattern="filename1")){ x <- read.table(i) list1[[i]] <- x } list2 <- list() for (i in list.files(pattern="filename2*")){ x <- read.table(i) list2[[i]] <- x } anslist <- vector('list', length(list1)) for(i in 1:length(list1)) if (list1[[i]] & list2[[i]] >1)

I'm attempting to generalise a function that reads individual list components, in this case they are matrices, and converts them into 3 dimensional array. I can input each matrix individually, but want to do it for about 1,000 of them ... This works array2 <- abind(list1[[1]],list1[[2]],list1[[3]],along=3) This doesn't array2 <- abind(list1[[1:3]],along=3) This doesn't either

R-helpers: Say I have two lists of arbitrary elements, e.g.: list1=list(c(1:3),"R is fun!",c(3:6)) list2=list(c(10:5),c(5:3),c(13,5),"I am so confused") I would like to produce a single new list that is composed of all combinations of the "top level" of list1 and list2, e.g.: listcombo=list(list(list1[[1]],list2[[1]]),list(list1[[1]],list2[[2]]

Hi, I am wondering whether we can apply 'cbind/rbind' on many **equivalent** list objects. For example please consider following: > list1 <- list2 <- vector("list", length=2); names(list1) <- names(list2) <- c("a", "b") > list1[[1]] <- matrix(1:25, 5) > list1[[2]] <- matrix(2:26, 5) > list2[[1]] <- 10:14 > list2[[2]] <-

I am new to R, and I have been running into the following situation when I mistype a variable name in some code: > list1 <- list( a=1, b=2 ) > list2 <- list( a=1 ) > list2$b <- list1$c > list2 $a [1] 1 I would think at the point where I am trying to reference a field called "c" -- that does not exist -- in list1, there would be an error flagged. Instead, list1$c

Hi, I have two lists 1) List1- 30,000 rows and 104 columns 2) List2- a list of 14000 selected rownames  from List 1 Now, I want to extract all the 104 columns of List1  matching with the 14000 selected rownames from List2.  Psedocode will be something like this: match rownames(List2) with rownames(List1) extract selected matched 104 coloumns from (List1) strore in-> List3 So the