similar to: I am a fresh dovecot user.

Working on an RH9 box. Did not use yum. Downloaded the "dovecot-stable-latest.tar.gz". Uncompressed it, downloaded and installed gcc. Ran the following: ./configure make sudo make install Seemed to have done its thing. I'll admit I am not well versed in using "make" or compiling anything. When I install I usually use yum on fedora machines. This one being an RH9 machine

Hi, I'm currently busy setting up a machine for use as an internet kiosk. Here's what I aim to do. - There's only one user on the system, 'invite'. One (very simple) password. The machine is to be used publicly and freely. - To ensure some privacy, there's one detail though. The best thing would be that upon disconnection from the GNOME session, the user

I recommend using https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 if you can spare 1.1 GB of disk and bandwidth for the initial checkout and git repo itself. It's just a few minutes behind the svn master copies. I don't know of a better monorepo at present. Although everything is there, things such as clang and compiler-rt aren't actually built unless you saymlink them into the

Hi LLVM Devs, I recently finished working for Intel/Movidius, and thought that before I start working on some new LLVM project, that this would be a good time to discard all of my old practices (which began with v2.7, and has gathered crud over the years) and restart with a brand new fresh LLVM approach directly from head. In preparation for doing this, I would like to know what is the

Thanks Dean and Bruce. 1.1GB is a "lot" smaller than I expected, my worry was that it might be >60GB with the entire change histories to v1.0. Disk space is not a problem (at ~€80 per TB) just ISP download caps and 1.1GB is well under the radar :-) I will get Phabricator set up for collaboration. Thanks again for your help, MartinO -----Original Message----- From: Dean Michael

Yes, it's not bad. You can actually reduce the size of the .git directory to 597 MB by running "git repack -a -d -f --depth=250 --window=250". This takes less than 5 minutes on a 16 core Xeon. Unfortunately I've never found a way to get such a nicely packed repo into github such that it checks out for others as nicely as it was when I uploaded it :-( On Mon, May 14, 2018 at

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:48 PM Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I recommend using https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 if you can spare 1.1 GB of disk and bandwidth for the initial checkout and git repo itself. > It's just a few minutes behind the svn master copies. I don't know of a better monorepo at present. > Although

I have a situation like below: Samba servers in many cities; one "backup" server in the central location that fetches user profiles each night (changes really with rsync). Users work in many locations; sometimes one user can work in city A, and a day later he can work in city B. This means that they have problems with their profiles - user profile for city A will be different from

>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:08:51 -0600 James McTavish wrote: > > I'm getting ready to set up a new system, and I want to run wine with it > using a windows partition. I know wine works with win95 and 98 > (presumably 98se too) versions, however I can't find out if it will run > with windows 2000 anywhere. I'm going to have a windows 2000 partition > anyway (in

Morning all, I've managed to work my self into a corner and hoping someone can help me out I have OpenLDAP and Dovecot installed based on the following documents: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DovecotLDAP https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OpenLDAPServer When Dovecot is set up to log in without using LDAP, connections work fine. However as soon as I change the dovecot.conf to use

Apologies for resending this, I am not sure it made it through the first time.. --- Included below are my config files: sendmail.mc, dovecot.m4, dovecot.conf, dovecot-sql.conf. Whenever I try to send email into this system, it rejects it with user does not exist, however, the user does exist as far as dovecot (imap) is concerned, it is in the database. THANKS - Yossie # for i in

To use dovecot-postfix stack with thunderbird, do I put the configuration into /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/impad.protocol? That would seem to be how the stack is configured. "Thunderbird To use with Thunderbird, edit the file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf: protocol imap { ... login_greeting_capability = yes imap_client_workarounds = tb-extra-mailbox-sep }"

Included below are my config files: sendmail.mc, dovecot.m4, dovecot.conf, dovecot-sql.conf. Whenever I try to send email into this system, it rejects it with user does not exist, however, the user does exist as far as dovecot (imap) is concerned, it is in the database. THANKS - Yossie # for i in /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf /

Re: Per the discussions about spam on this list. Sending a confirming message to an unregistered poster is not a good idea. The return/reply-to addresses in spam is forged, and that is just adding to some victims e-mail. Filtering runs the risk that a legitimate message gets lost, and the sender does not realize it. Filtering is also the most expensive and innefficient way to deal with

Dear List, I cannot get public ssh keys to work in a fresh install of centos6.5 This might be a centos bug. I've googled for a solution. Mostly I found threads suggesting I debug sshd or run ssh -v for clues. Also I've seen threads suggesting I look at file and directory permissions. I dont think I should need to debug sshd after a fresh install. Also I think a fresh install should

Hi, first of all i want to thank you all that do this help. Without this i cold never put my own webserver. Now my question. I know when i have to install some software, they recommend a "fresh" install of centos, but my provider (we have server via internet and webmin) every fresh install says that i need to pay like 50$ ( alittle expensive for me). Im live i Costa RIca and here

For testing purposes, I am running Windows 7 on a VM (VMWare), reverting to "fresh install" Windows 7 frequently. This Windows 7 client, needs to access a share on a local Samba server (Samba 3.0.23a-1 running on Fedora Core 4). When I type \\sambahost\sharename, a prompt for the username and password will eventually appear (and let me authenticate successfully) but it takes almost

http://www.colgate.toothpaste-sample.com Get New Colgate Max Fresh Whitening Toothpaste. Cool Mint Flaor with Breath Strips. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Am 24.03.2014 14:13, schrieb Mau Z: > Hi All, > > I am trying to install extlinux on a fresh system. > > Here are my steps : > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > A) Create an ext2 partition. I did the following steps : > > 1) boot from CD > 2) Activate GParted > 3) Create Partition table on the "fresh disk" (/dev/sda). > 4) Create 1 ext2 partition

Before I submit as a bug, has anyone else encountered -- doing a fresh, clean install of CentOS-3 results in a resolv.conf with only my secondary nameserver listed and the search domain. The install works fine, the eth0 and eth1 (onboard e100's) are detected, all the right info entered, etc -- typical by the book textmode (not GUI) install that I'd normally do with RH9/RHEL3. Static