similar to: dovecot crash on sendfilev64 on solaris 8 (32bit) (WORKAROUND)

Hi, i'm running dovecot on a SMP sparc 32bit server with solaris 8(latest patch installed). Dovecot with ssl. Postfix+imap+maildrop . Dovecot work fine with every email and folders delivered by maildrop, but now i'm trying to move all my local folders (i'm using mutt and i'm storing my emails locally on my pc) to the imap server . The upload of an entire 12000 mails folders

It would be very nice to know about some good success without too much cpu issues on Nokia devices, i tried pjsip.org project on S60 FP1 E65 +200mhz ARM cpu with speex but don't had much luck in using it without having 100% cpu usage :( Please let us to know about your testing E65 CPU: http://www.nokia-tuning.net/index.php?s=processor Fabio Pietrosanti Jordan Dimov wrote: > Thank

Quoting "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists at infosecurity.ch>: > Speex it's too cpu expensive for general S60 usage, it would require a > lot of ASM optimization. Did a quick search and saw ARM CPUs with speeds above 100 MHz. That should actually be enough for Speex, at least for narrowband. > If you are using CSD, like for a secure telephony solution >

Hi Timo, We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP process to hang. Here's how it looks like if we issued a FETCH 40 FULL: * 40 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "09-Aug-2007 11:50:44 +0800" RFC822.SIZE 803392 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:09:09 +0800 (CST)" {64} 8???????x?C???W?[79?? !! Smart???z?Y???|?j????20????????????????

Hi, i was using rsync 2.4.5 for AIX 4.3 binary downloaded from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/AIX/ . I now compiled the latest 2.5.6 on AIX 4.3.3 and created a tarball to use like the one available from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/AIX/ . root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# uname -a AIX b50srv1 3 4 000B14FD4C00 root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# oslevel 4.3.3.0

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) a ?crit : > However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows > Mobile i will need to pay a quite expensive royalty for each peace of > software distributed (not sold, distributed!!!). This is exactly why I wrote Speex! > So, i am evaluating other codes and the only real alternative capable of > running on a 9.6kb/s link seems to

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > > I got the feedback that Speex require too much computation power to run > on Symbian OS and Windows Mobile devices doing encoding/decoding in > realtime with all the Narrowband-enabled features. > > I crawled the mailing list archive and the internet and i was not able > to

you can use the marker bit on the RTP. - farhan On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which > is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? > > I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the

Thank you, guys. Most smartphones in production today run at ~300MHz and above. So this shouldn't be a problem. I'll try to compile speex for Symbian (I see it's been ported, but the Symbian port is somewhat out of date?) and I'll run it on a pair of Nokia N76 phones. I'll let you know how it works out. If someone has any further advice in this direction, I would deeply

hi all, I can claim that our hotfoon service has run millions of mobile voip minutes using speex on mobile and desktops. it works! earlier you needed more powerful cpus (until the integer port), however now the cpus are much faster and the code complexity is much lower. my only regret is of not being able to write some demo apps for speex on win mob. I will surely deliver it in june to settle this

Dear all, i am currently evaluating which codec to be used for a "very narrowband" voice communication system (using either VoIP either GSM CSD) on mobile devices running Windows Mobile and Symbian OS. I had experience in using AMR-NB 4.75 with VAD on Symbian OS and all worked very well. However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows Mobile i will need

Is speex at this stage a good codec to use for real-time voice transmission over a direct CSD connection between two phones? Does anyone have any experience with using Speex on Nokia phones? If speex is not a good solution for this task, what would you recommend? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmission of VAD/CNG samples by specifying "outbound" in the communication channel only 1 bit instead of sending the whole VAD/CNG packet. I am doing the same for AMR

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > i am not criticizing the technology itself, but the fact that from the > point of view of the implementator that need to make a technological > choice while selecting a codec to be used for a mobile multimedia > application, speex does not provide affordable informations on > "supported platform".

Hi, after watching the security alerts for the centos kernel I've the impression that altought they are fixed fastly there are more alerts than for the vanilla one of the same version. Question: Are those alerts mostly specifically centos related or do they also affect the vanilla sources? -- mailintern at 123mail.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the

Hi guys, I am starting project to develop open implementation of some (naturally open codec) for simply designed embedded devices which can be used by small to big VoIP operators or hobbyists which wants to build their own small and low cost VoIP phone. Speex seems to be great choice. And greater will be if there should be some guys who want to help ;-). Altought I am experienced in C/ASM

Hi , I've some torubles with smb server provided with Debian 3.0 Woody - I can't see any machine in network neighbourhood, altought all machines are loging and mapping resources shared by server correctly. What exactly is needed to be installed with smb - any DNS or something like this? Maybe the question is not too clever, but when I've had my server on RH7.2 there was no such

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > No it isn't, you should definitely remove the 'idmap config' lines. OK, removed. Thanks. > You should only have the 'dsdb' line active in smb.conf when you need to > modify the schema, you should turn it off when not required. Ok. > > Clearly i've added 'logon *' options bacause i

Hi to all, I was looking in google and also in this mailing list, but I dont find the solution to my problem, so I subscribe me to the list in order to post this e-mail and find the solution. This is the scenario: GSM Phone ----- GSM Network ---- TDM2406E --- ASterisk 1.4.0 (*) -------- VoIP Provider ------- Sip Phone or H323 Phone The problem is that I am generating calls from SIP and also

Hi, I just tested in the lab the new CentOS 5.1 Xen and find out it breaks network connectivity, at least in my setup. It seems it is somehow making use of the 3.1 Xen version (altought I am not sure about that) but whatever changes it introduce is not documented at the location one would expect, the obvious new thing (at least for me) is this thing I will call out of guessing a virtual