similar to: dovecot crash on sendfilev64 on solaris 8 (32bit)

Hi, related to my previous email i found that setting "mail_save_crlf = no" instead of yes make dovecot working. However if enabled on solaris 8 it doesn't work hanging on sendfilev64() call. I noticed that maildir file names are still different from maildrop and dovecot but now works. However moving bigger mailbox from local storage to remote imap server i receive

Hi Timo, We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP process to hang. Here's how it looks like if we issued a FETCH 40 FULL: * 40 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "09-Aug-2007 11:50:44 +0800" RFC822.SIZE 803392 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:09:09 +0800 (CST)" {64} 8???????x?C???W?[79?? !! Smart???z?Y???|?j????20????????????????

It would be very nice to know about some good success without too much cpu issues on Nokia devices, i tried pjsip.org project on S60 FP1 E65 +200mhz ARM cpu with speex but don't had much luck in using it without having 100% cpu usage :( Please let us to know about your testing E65 CPU: http://www.nokia-tuning.net/index.php?s=processor Fabio Pietrosanti Jordan Dimov wrote: > Thank

Quoting "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists at infosecurity.ch>: > Speex it's too cpu expensive for general S60 usage, it would require a > lot of ASM optimization. Did a quick search and saw ARM CPUs with speeds above 100 MHz. That should actually be enough for Speex, at least for narrowband. > If you are using CSD, like for a secure telephony solution >

I get this when I build --with-gnome: make[1]: Entering directory `/storage/build/R-0.64.1/src/include' make[1]: `FFDecl.h' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/storage/build/R-0.64.1/src/include' gcc -msupersparc -I../include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/local/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/local/lib/glib/include -I/usr/openwin/include

Dear all, i am currently evaluating which codec to be used for a "very narrowband" voice communication system (using either VoIP either GSM CSD) on mobile devices running Windows Mobile and Symbian OS. I had experience in using AMR-NB 4.75 with VAD on Symbian OS and all worked very well. However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows Mobile i will need

Hi all, i read about the TLS-RENEGOTIATION vulnerability: http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2009/11/understanding_the_tls_renegoti.html http://www.sslshopper.com/article-ssl-and-tls-renegotiation-vulnerability-discovered.html www.phonefactor.com/sslgapdocs/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf Does the Asterisk 1.6/1.8 SIP/TLS implementation suffer from the TLS Renegotiation vulnerability or the

Hi, i was using rsync 2.4.5 for AIX 4.3 binary downloaded from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/AIX/ . I now compiled the latest 2.5.6 on AIX 4.3.3 and created a tarball to use like the one available from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/binaries/AIX/ . root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# uname -a AIX b50srv1 3 4 000B14FD4C00 root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# oslevel 4.3.3.0

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) a ?crit : > However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows > Mobile i will need to pay a quite expensive royalty for each peace of > software distributed (not sold, distributed!!!). This is exactly why I wrote Speex! > So, i am evaluating other codes and the only real alternative capable of > running on a 9.6kb/s link seems to

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > > I got the feedback that Speex require too much computation power to run > on Symbian OS and Windows Mobile devices doing encoding/decoding in > realtime with all the Narrowband-enabled features. > > I crawled the mailing list archive and the internet and i was not able > to

you can use the marker bit on the RTP. - farhan On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which > is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? > > I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the

Thank you, guys. Most smartphones in production today run at ~300MHz and above. So this shouldn't be a problem. I'll try to compile speex for Symbian (I see it's been ported, but the Symbian port is somewhat out of date?) and I'll run it on a pair of Nokia N76 phones. I'll let you know how it works out. If someone has any further advice in this direction, I would deeply

Hi all, i am not criticizing the technology itself, but the fact that from the point of view of the implementator that need to make a technological choice while selecting a codec to be used for a mobile multimedia application, speex does not provide affordable informations on "supported platform". Without arranging a test bed with a lot of devices and spending a lot of money i

hi all, I can claim that our hotfoon service has run millions of mobile voip minutes using speex on mobile and desktops. it works! earlier you needed more powerful cpus (until the integer port), however now the cpus are much faster and the code complexity is much lower. my only regret is of not being able to write some demo apps for speex on win mob. I will surely deliver it in june to settle this

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > i am not criticizing the technology itself, but the fact that from the > point of view of the implementator that need to make a technological > choice while selecting a codec to be used for a mobile multimedia > application, speex does not provide affordable informations on > "supported platform".

Is speex at this stage a good codec to use for real-time voice transmission over a direct CSD connection between two phones? Does anyone have any experience with using Speex on Nokia phones? If speex is not a good solution for this task, what would you recommend? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, as good? I am trying to make a call for the Unicall channels and after the exchange of signalling and sending of the digits asterisk locks up with the sending of the signalling "E" and the TELCO says that asterisk would have to send signalling "F", as to make for asterisk to send signalling "F"? The TELCO says that the signalling "E" is

Hello I've tried a bunch of things, but still get errors/warnings when using the IF() function: ============== TEST #1 exten => h,n,Set(WAV_FILE=${IF($[ ${STAT(e,/tmp/${CALLTIME}.wav)} ]?${CALLTIME}.wav)}) [Nov 26 21:52:34] WARNING[5074]: func_logic.c:107 acf_if: Syntax IF(<expr>?[<true>][:<false>]) ============== TEST #2 exten =>

Hi all, supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmission of VAD/CNG samples by specifying "outbound" in the communication channel only 1 bit instead of sending the whole VAD/CNG packet. I am doing the same for AMR