similar to: Mailing list problems fixed

Hey there, sorry to bug you, I've ran into a little problem conscerning a logcheck-rule I just wrote. I use logcheck and logcheck-database on Debian Etch. When logcheck reports me something I don't want it to, I normally write a rule to match that logentry and put it in a file called my_rules in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ ... that worked perfectly fine. Until that rule: Logcheck

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

Yes !! you totaly right.. When i make it, its gone within 1 month, the new mail setup is ready, and tested, only the migration todo ... But first snowboarding again next week.. :-)) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland penny > Verzonden: donderdag 7 januari 2016 15:00 > Aan: samba at

All i have is : smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated   I disabled the unknown restriction due to lots of customers of me are missing PTR records, which needs to be set bij the internet provider. So they got blocked, i had to remove these.   The Helo check is often on the IT department can adjust them selfs. And most spammers have incorrect helo’s

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.22a Severity: normal Thanks to the upgrade to Postfix 2.1 and deploying a newer logcheck ruleset on a busier server I've found a bunch more rules for Postfix. I've attached new rules files and patches are inline. The following patch is for violations.ignore.d: --- logcheck-postfix.orig 2004-06-21 20:11:14.000000000 +0100 +++ logcheck-postfix

Hi, I am trying to set up my own mail server (to get off Google) and I have a problem with mail delivery. I'm using Postfix as a SMTP front-end, and use the LMTP server included in dovecot to receive mail from postfix. I have a setup which works with the dovecot LDA, it involves calling dovecot-lda with the -d flag. Postfix computes the username by removing what's after the

Anything else I can provide ?? Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7. -------- Original message --------From: Larry Rosenman <larryrtx at gmail.com> Date: 11/1/16 1:37 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> Cc: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: doveadm index: can't index a different namespace? Nothing in them from what I can

Hi all, I had a big problem I did not figured out. It is solved, but I have questions about the matter. It's about Exim 4.72/CentOS 6. Connecting to Exim via "localhost" is denies relay Connecting to Exim via 127.0.0.1 accepts the relay "localhost" is in the local_domains domainlists "localhost" is resolving to 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts Why? [mihamina at

On 07/23/2018 06:28 PM, tdukes at palmettoshopper.com wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working > From: Nataraj <incoming-centos at rjl.com> > Date: Mon, July 23, 2018 9:01 pm > To: centos at centos.org > > On 07/23/2018 03:39 PM, TE Dukes wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Mail has come to an abrupt stop.

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.44 Severity: minor Tags: patch Please change the following line in violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix: -^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtp\[[0-9]+\]: [[:upper:]0-9]+: to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9.]{7,15}\], delay=[0-9]+, status=(deferred|bounced) \(host [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9.]{7,15}\] said: [45][0-9][0-9] .* \(in

I am getting this error: ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail-in.cbl.abuseat.org.: >>> DATA <<< 550 HELO for IP 24.123.23.170 was "unifiedpaging.messagenetsystems.com" 550 5.1.1 <helocheck at cbl.abuseat.org>... User unknown <<< 503-All RCPT commands were rejected with this error: <<< 503-HELO for IP

On 04.03.2018 16:25, Reio Remma wrote: > Hello! > > I'm having crashes with LMTP delivery when user is over quota on the > latest CentOS 7.4 with the latest Dovecot 2.3.0.1 from Dovecot repo. > > I see the issue has been fixed on January 17, but it doesn't seem to > have made it into 2.3.0.1 (I compared with the source from >

Hallo Liste, hallo Ralf, danke schon mal. Ja die Whitespaces sind beim Rausl?schen entstanden. Ich verstand das so, dass das nun durch die address_verify_map erledigt w?rde. Muss ich dann entsprechend einfach auf die verweisen? Ich versuchte gerade die address_verify_map = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache auf local_recipient_maps = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache verweisen zu lassen.

Hello, I'm setting up Dovecot 2.3.2.1 as a submission proxy to a Postfix backend server. Dovecot announces CHUNKING, but the Postfix backend does not support (or announce) it. HELO from Postfix: 220 backend.mydomain.com ESMTP Postfix (Ubuntu) ehlo test 250-backend.mydomain.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 104857600 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS

I upgraded to 1.2.28, same results. Here are the rules I added. ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ perdition\[[0-9]+\]: Connect: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[NOTICE\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ pure-ftpd: [^[:space:]]+ \[INFO\] ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ exact\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ slapd\[[0-9]+\]: ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11}

FreeBSD 11.2 Postfix 3.3.2 Dovecot 2.3.4 I am trying to use dovecot lmtp with postfix to verify authentication of incoming email and to avoid being a spam relay (an issue I was having using sendmail as my MTA). I am getting the following log message in /var/log/maillog: Mar 30 20:31:38 ns postfix/smtpd[40373]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

On 27/02/2023 4:13 am, Chris Candreva wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Ken Bass wrote: > >> doc.dovecot.org does not have a DNS entry. It worked a few days ago, but not now. > [chris at newpop ~]$ host doc.dovecot.org > doc.dovecot.org is an alias for talvi.dovecot.org. > talvi.dovecot.org has address 94.237.105.223 > talvi.dovecot.org has IPv6 address

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'd like to add the following rule to /etc/logcheck/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix : ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd?\[[0-9]+\]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]: 554 <[._[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\]>:

Hi list, I have been getting the following types of log messages Jan 30 08:22:33 ndgonline postfix/smtpd[30538]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[71.46.229.50]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [71.46.229.50]; from=<DWoodman at orangebankfl.com> to=<rkampen at ndgonline.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.floridianbank.com> a rdns check shows all is well