similar to: Dovecot 0.99.10.4 for Debian

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Dovecot 0.99.10.4 for Debian"

2004 Jul 06
1
Debian woody backport of 0.99.10.6 now available on backports.org
Well, the backports.org people finally installed my backport of the latest stable version of dovecot. Please remove the Braincells apt source form /etc/apt/sources.list and add these lines instead. deb http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot openldap2 postgresql openssl deb-src http://www.backports.org/debian stable dovecot (If you are using other backports you can merge dovecot etc.
2005 Nov 06
2
1.0alpha4 uploaded to Debian unstable
I finally got some free time and uploaded 1.0alpha4. It will arrive in the archive by tomorrow afternoon. Together with the most recent libssl0.9.8 upgrade I think this will fix the SSL problems users have been facing. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2004 Jul 30
2
Patch for 0.99.10.8
I uploaded 0.99.10.8 to Debian but I needed the patch below to get it to compile. --- dovecot-0.99.10.8.orig/src/auth/db-mysql.h +++ dovecot-0.99.10.8/src/auth/db-mysql.h @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ #ifndef __DB_MYSQL_H #define __DB_MYSQL_H -#include <mysql.h> +#include <mysql/mysql.h> +#include <mysql/errmsg.h> struct mysql_connection; struct mysql_request; -- Jaldhar H. Vyas
2004 Aug 09
3
Debian sarge release and dovecot
In what must surely be the first sign of the apocalypse, Debian is actually freezing in preperation for a new release. Probably the last day for uploads will be August 17. Is there likely to be another dovecot release by then? In the event of 0.99.10.9 being the released version, are there any other patches Debian users would like me to include? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at
2003 Mar 19
1
Dotlocking doesn't work?
A Debian developer had this to say: > >> Files in the above dir are group mail, and the dir is group mail. However, > > > all binaries in /usr/lib/dovecot are root/root. I have set them all to g+s, > > > and group mail, and now the imap process can lock the INBOX. > > > > > imap should be the only one that needs to be setgid mail. > > Actually,
2003 Feb 03
1
About the dovecot package (fwd)
Dear Timo, What do you think of this? Fyi, I've been getting the same thing lately and I'm wondering if gnutls is to blame? (i've had inexlicable SIGSEGVs in other apps before due to it.) Tomorrow I'll try with openssl but I was wondering if you had any other ideas? -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at debian.org> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
2004 Jun 20
1
Debian dovecot news
I uploaded 0.99.10.6 to sid. Owing to the importance of the dot lock fix, I've tried to have this pushed to sarge quickly. Let's see how that goes. I've prepared a backport of 0.99.10.6 to woody which should be showing up on www.backports.org soon hopefully. In the meantime, if you desperately need it and don't mind working out dependencies yourself, you can find it at
2003 Dec 16
3
Re: Bug#224092: Dovecot IMAP: detection of folders
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jeroen van Disseldorp wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.10.4-2 > Severity: normal > > When accessing a maildir with "all folders" instead of "only subscribed > folders", dovecot wrongfully reports its index-files (.imap.*) as mail > folders. When the client (KMail 1.5.2 in my case) checks for email, it > aborts halfway
2003 Mar 17
1
debian 0.99.8.1 packages available
I thought I'd mention it here because a lot of people have been waiting for me on this. My personal situation is getting saner now so I finally was able to package up 0.99.8.1. The package for sid was uploaded last night and should appear in the archive today. A backport for woody is available from http://www.braincells.com/open/ I have not included POP3, LDAP or SASL2 support for now as I
2003 Sep 05
1
Debian bug #201444: More verbose logging
I brought this up a while ago but the submitter is wondering if there has been any progress on this issue. He says: It would be extremely nice to have a little bit more detailed logging, and I believe it doesn't really require that much code. I use now a daemon which logs login (name, ip; as dovecot does), and logout (with name, logout reason if any special) with the numbers of
2004 Dec 13
1
latest debs
Just wondering: Has anyone, or is anyone planning to, build debs for 0.99.12? Jaldhar Vyas, are you still around and doing such things? Paul
2005 Aug 03
3
debs for 1.0?
Hi, 0.99 is running nicely on my sarges, but I need pop3_uidl_format = %f for Courier compatibility. I can't find any debs more recent than test22 of over a year ago (those are at http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/). Even though google turns up http://hemma.tobbe.nu/debian/mini-dinstall/incoming/dovecot_1.0.test46-1_i386.changes searching for dovecot on packages.debian.org (any
2003 Oct 02
2
Patches
As the freeze for Debian sarge slowly approaches I want to make sure the Dovecot packages are in as good condition as possible. I see there have been a number of patches since 0.99.10. I have added the following patches: * segfault when user home directory is empty * Proper PAM service name * Make suid work on 2.6 kernels Any other patches thatI ought to add. Or better yet, will there be a
2004 Mar 30
2
dovecot not reconnecting to ldap after ldap restart
I upgraded dovecot two weeks ago from 0.99.10-0.rc2 to 0.99.10.4-1woody1 (both from the woody backport packages from braincells.com). Dovecot is using LDAP on a separate machine for authentication. (through stunnel if it matters) At 4:00 am, the LDAP server stops, dumps the ldap database, and then starts back up. Because the LDAP server is stopped, anyone who tries to authenticate during
2005 Jul 22
1
Re: Bug#319504: Bug in 0.99.14 mbox handling - mail UIDs are renumbered without bumping UIDVALIDITY
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, David McBride wrote: > Package: dovecot-imapd > Version: 0.99.14-1 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I think I've identified a bug in Dovecot 0.99.14 as packaged and > distributed by Debian Sarge. I believe the bug lies in the original > Dovecot source, not with any modifications made by Debian. > > Specifically, this bug deals with
2003 Sep 05
3
Dovecot not starting
Hello everybody, sorry for stupid qustion, but I have following problem: I succesfully installed Dovecot on Debian (from source). Now I want to run it. I tryed: # /usr/local/dovecot/sbin/dovecot # but nothing happened: # ps -Af | grep dove ....... ps -Af | grep dove # What is wrong? I want Dovecot to serve POP3 over SSL. Many thanks and sorry again :o)
2004 Feb 29
1
severe problem
I have debian knoppix and postfix + dovecot imap My problem is the following: Feb 29 18:51:14 cybserv imap-login: Login: xx at xxx.xx [xx.xx.xx.xx] Feb 29 18:51:14 cybserv dovecot: child 13959 (imap) killed with signal 11 Feb 29 18:52:41 cybserv imap-login: Disconnected [xx.xxx.xx.xx] Feb 29 18:52:41 cybserv dovecot: child 13952 (login) killed with signal 11 I'm using the debian package
2004 Mar 02
2
Dovecot failing silently on startup
I'm puzzled... I'm running the Debian package of Dovecot 0.99.10.4 on a Debian (testing) server, and it's basically doing nothing on startup for an extended period. After a while (maybe 10 minutes or more) it all suddenly starts working, all without logging anything untoward. All the dovecot processes appear to start OK, and 'Dovecot starting up' is logged to the syslog. If
2003 Apr 30
0
Debian packages for 0.99.9
I uploaded the new version to sid today. Apart from the new version a big change is that it has now been split into 4 pieces. dovecot-imapd and dovecot-pop3d are the imap server and the pop3 server rspectively. They are seperate so you can install one without the other. dovecot-common contains the files they both use. dovecot is just a dummy to ensure smooth upgrades for users of older
2002 Dec 18
1
0.99.4 uploaded to Debian
Hi, I'm the Debian maintainer of UW-Imap. Like many I'm somewhat frustrated with the limitations of it so I am very pleased to see that Dovecot is becoming a strong alternative. I have uploaded packages of 0.99.4 to the Debian unstable distribution (sid). Because this is a new package it has to be added by hand so it may be a while before it shows up in sid. In the mean time, I have