similar to: Maildir Sub folder was not fetch as start

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches similar to: "Maildir Sub folder was not fetch as start"

2002 Jun 21
0
Username for Share-level Not working.
Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.
2002 Jun 21
0
Username for Share-level Not working. (re-send)
Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.
2014 Feb 05
1
ldb segment fault. Problem on joining as a DC member.
Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version
2014 Aug 04
1
Join AD DC Fail (LDAP_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS)
Dear All, Any suggestion to the message below? Thank You. amtbsrv02 ~ # samba-tool domain join amtb-workgroup DC -Uadministrator --realm=KL01.AMTB-M.ORG.MY --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Finding a writeable DC for domain 'amtb-workgroup' Found DC amtbserver.kl01.amtb-m.org.my Password for [AMTB-WORKGROUP\administrator]: workgroup is AMTB-WORKGROUP realm is kl01.amtb-m.org.my checking
2014 Oct 07
1
CDTB On Samba 4.1.12 As Member files server.
Hello all, I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start... I follow this guide by steve which is nice. The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running... Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but same subnet This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all have the same name. I'm only planing 3
2013 Dec 03
4
Samba 4 DNS name Planing
Dear All, Can help to advise if there are any name planing for dns? e.g: I've a domain amtb-m.org should my samba4 server be ad.amtb-m.org? OR should I create another non-reachable internal domain e.g: ad.amtb-m.lan For them? What is the benefit on this or that? Any documentation about that? Thank you.
2014 Mar 12
1
Strange GID and UID with winbindd + Samba AD DC
Dear All, I've some strange entry on my getent as shown below. It seem that There are some strange value UID/GID 4294967295 <-- what number is this? I get this info from my Domain member which serving as a files server. Also some different GID from Samba AD DC E.g wbinfo from AD DC (default configuration after classical migratation) --> AD DC have no winbind configuration. wbinfo
2014 Nov 04
1
Strange DNS Entry that is not present record
Dear All, I was doing my sql server migration and found some strand dns input... Under host -l The mysqlsrv was with the following ip.(Haproxy not done yet will do it later when fixed this) mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.14 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.28 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.32 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address
2014 Aug 27
1
Samba 4.1.11 member server (Files server) bugs
Dear All, Anyone have any hints on bugs affecting samba 4.1.11 acting as a member server? I've some complain about Office 2013/365 They said that network share are not available and force to exit and documentation recovery are not possible. (But as I can see the network are still working fine...) The same configuration on samba 3.6.x are working without problem. Below are my configuration
2014 Oct 18
1
Office Words 2013 Crash from time to time
Dear All, I've been upgrade from 3.6.x to 4.1.x (Member server) All Win 7 Pro 64. While in 3.6.x there is no such report on the issue,just people complain about the slowness While in 4.1.x there are random report on this issue not everyone but more to a particular person... That seem to be happening from 4.1.6, 4.1.11 and 4.1.12 And I've really no idea why or how. Any suggestion to
2015 Mar 09
0
Missing DNS entry on Win RAST but show on ldbedit
Dear All, Need some advise on a Missing DNS entry I've a missing DNS entry where it will now show on the RAST tools but still it can be query... I try ldbedit and it show below Do you think I should delete this record and recreate it again? or there is a better way. Thank You Regards, Min Wai ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb --show-binary --cross-ncs -b
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The
2016 Aug 03
1
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section
2016 Jul 24
0
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hi, That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Hello Sébastien Le Ray, > > The PC reply the following... > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user > name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: > a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain
2002 Nov 09
2
Windows Client Sharing Problem (Access Denied)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greeting, ~ I've setup my Red Hat 7.3 With samba 2.2.5 to be a PDC. Which at the same time, I'm having the same problem like *problems on windows part <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103675771200004&r=1&w=2>*. Accessing from windows to Linux always not a problem. But I'm having a problem to access it reverse. (from Linux
2006 Feb 15
3
[Bug 1158] Setting the environment in authorized_keys does not work
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158 Summary: Setting the environment in authorized_keys does not work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org
2016 Jul 24
0
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hi, Do you have any specific error message in Windows events log concerning GPO? Regards Le 24/07/2016 à 05:40, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Dear All, > I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO > are having issue > > Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate > success fully. > > When I run samba-tool ntacl
2004 Aug 21
2
Dovecot stop accepting command When reading disk quota (soft)
Hello all, I've face some problem here and I think it should be the way. 1) I'm running Dovecot version 0.99.10.4 (fc1 release) on RH9 2) One of the users have reach the soft disk quota limits 3) Dovecot stop the users from deleting email. What I think was, dovecot should let the user continue to use the services until it reach the hard limits, but pop up message each and every time ;).