Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "patch and bug report (from an other in fact)"
2005 Feb 07
1
Remote MWI via IAX?
We have a couple of Asterisk boxes with one being the main system with
everyone's voicemail and the other a slave used merely to link a couple
of remote phones to the main system using IAX.
How can one propagate message waiting indication from the main system to
the remote phones?
g.
2019 Jul 26
0
Define libvirt network portgroup with native untagged.
Hi,
I have created a libvirt network on top of a OVS bridge (named vlan-br)
which receives all VLAN tagged packets, i.e. connected to a trunk port. The
definition xml is below.
What I want to achieve in the portgroup definition 'trunk-native-1221' is
to allow 1221 as untagged/native but rest all VLAN as tagged. The following
portgroup definition works, but I don't want to enumerate
2009 Feb 20
1
Paravirtualized DomU clock stops after migrating back
Hi all,
I think this problem is well known, but I cannot say the same for the
solution..
A similar issue was discussed in this mailing list:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2008-08/msg01039.html
There are also two bug reports about it, which are marked as resolved,
somehow...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426861
2003 Apr 21
0
Health check
Hi
I have a quad processor Compaq Proliant 5500. The output
from dmesg seems strange (I have also sent a copy to
freebsd-smp to ask about smp issues) and there are also some
performance issues which I suspect are smp related. Could
anyone who fels so inclined please take a look at the output
and let me have any comments.
Thanks
_______________________________
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The
2003 Apr 23
2
Fw: Anyone please???? SMP & general health check!!
I put this to the smp list and to stable but have had no
takers from wither. nThere are both smp and other system
issues and I am just wondering if anyoe would be willing to
take a look at this output from dmesg and let me have some
advice
Thanks
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "vizion communication" <vizion@ixpres.com>
To: <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>
Sent:
2009 Apr 03
0
[Bridge] Interesting fragmentation behavior with gretap interface.
I'm trying to bridge a mix of 802.1q tagged and untagged Ethernet frames
through the new Ethernet over GRE functionality in kernel 2.6.28
The hosts handling the tunnel (192.168.200.6, 192.168.200.2) are
connected together through with a simple cross cable through their eth1
interface. The switches are connected to their respective eth0
interface, which is bridged with their respective gretap
2015 Jan 25
2
VLAN issue
On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port?
>
Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan.
A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet
header when the packet enters the VLAN network. When we trunk a VLAN we say
to the switch "pass packets on VLAN x but
2007 Apr 18
5
[Bridge] RFC: [PATCH] bridge vlan integration
Hi,
The attached patches enables the bridge to filter and forward packets
according to their IEEE 802.1q headers. The goals behind this change
include :
- Enable running STP on 802.1q tagged networks. STP packets
must be untagged. It isn't obvious how else to enable STP
with the current bridge and vlan code.
- Add native support for an untagged vlan. Currently an untagged
vlan can
2010 Apr 16
2
2.0beta4 doesn't respond to DONE after untagged FETCH during IDLE
Using K-9 Mail to IDLE on a test folder "MyIncTmp". When there is a
flag change on a message in the folder, which generates an untagged
FETCH, K-9 Mail responds with a DONE, but dovecot does not exit IDLE
state (LOG 1). However, if a new message is delivered, generating an
untagged EXISTS, K-9 Mail responds the same way, with a DONE, and
dovecot does exit IDLE state. (LOG 2) You
2015 Jan 24
3
VLAN issue
Andrew and Dennis are spot on.
Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and
not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
dennisml at conversis.de> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch
> port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).
2003 Aug 21
1
SCSI Tape and CDROM
Hi, All.
I'm trying to use HP Suresore 24e on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE (Mon
May 12 09:32:15 YEKST 2003).
The system is installed on Asus P2b-DS motherboard with
Adaptec aic7890 onboard scsi-controller.
I have 2 SCSI-3 HDDs attached to it:
da0: <IBM DDYS-T18350N S96H> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
da1: <IBM DDYS-T09170N S80D> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device
and I'trying to
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Very strange hotmail login error!
Hi All,
Very sorry for posting my question again, because I want to tell you
more details on my issue, and it is very important for us!
Now I am having trouble in Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN, I have the
following network:
Internet
|
Gateway ( One UPNP device)
|
| <--------- If insert one Ethernet bridge box in here ,
somethings changes
|
H u b
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN , hotmail login error
Hi All,
I posted this question several days before, as if no one reply, any
help, hint would be highly appreciated!
PLEASE SAVE ME!
Now I am having trouble in Ethernet bridge and 802.1Q VLAN, I have the
following network:
Internet
|
|
Gateway
|
| <--------- If insert one Ethernet bridge box in here
,somethings changes
|
H u b ( one normal
2015 Jan 25
0
VLAN issue
OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port?
Boris.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 6:53 PM, SilverTip257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Andrew and Dennis are spot on.
> Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and
> not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well.
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
> dennisml at
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Re: Sorry for bothering Beg for help
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:50:00 -0800
"kingz" <jzhang@cienettechnologies.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for bothering you!
>
> Now I am in deep trouble on Ethernet bridge and VLAN, I posted my issue,
> but no reply, so I only beg for your help!
>
> Could you give me any comment, hint, way to fix my issue? Thank you very
> much!
>
> The following
2015 Jan 24
0
VLAN issue
Hi Boris,
what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch
port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs). When I look at the
switchport coniguration here I get (among other things):
...
Port link-type: trunk
Tagged VLAN ID : 8, 1624
Untagged VLAN ID : 10
...
Here is my suspicion:
Your ports have an access link-type with an untagged VLAN ID of 48. That
would
2007 Aug 29
2
new to rails, quick (hopefully simple) question
I am brand new to rails and I am attempting to make my first web app.
I have quickly run into my first problem however that I can''t seem to
get by. It seems like it would be easy to get around (with my
knowledge of other languages besides ruby), but I can''t seem to get by
it.
Right now, I have a note model that contains attributes, :title
(string) :content (text) and :tags
2003 Nov 25
1
mbox format
I wish to know some implementation details about mbox.
When you you mbox format in IMAP, are you doing to keep the same message
UID across IMAP session if you know that any other program can modify
the mailbox as it wants, for example, two messages can be exchanged.
In this case, will the UID kept the same ?
If they keep their UID, how do you identify the messages ?
Thanks,
--
DINH V.
2004 Jan 06
3
SSL and STARTTLS
I wanted to enable SSL on some alternate ports so that a limited number
of people could try SSL access. But doing so enabled STARTTLS in
IMAP, so that all IMAP users got surprised (at least those whose
clients attempted to use it automatically).
e.g.:
# IP or host address where to listen in for SSL connections. Defaults
# to above non-SSL equilevants if not specified.
imaps_listen =
2015 Jan 25
0
VLAN issue
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Holway <andrew.holway at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2015 at 15:12, Boris Epstein <borepstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK... but why does it need to be a trunk port?
>>
>
> Because a trunk port will "trunk" the vlan.
>
> A VLAN is basically a 4 byte "tag" that gets injected into the packet