similar to: Dovecot pop3 and Outlook Express timeout

/etc/postfix/main.cf.default: mailbox_delivery_lock = flock, dotlock Is flock equivalent to dovecot's fnctl locking? For mbox what type of locking settings should I be using? (No NFS, only local filesystem.) Warren Togami warren at togami.com

http://togami.com/~warren/archive/2003/evolution-1.4.4-crash.mbox I suspect that dovecot-0.99.10 is misserving this message in some way that is confusing some IMAP clients. This behavior causes evolution-1.4.4 to segfault, and squirrelmail-1.4.1 to be unable to read the message. The same message served by uw-imapd works works fine in both evolution and squirrelmail.

http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=160 This .src.rpm is dovecot with RH-specific default settings. I modified Jeremy Katz' dovecot-0.99.8.1 package a bit. When I upgraded from 0.99.8.1 it seemed to be broken until I looked at /var/log/maillog. There it indicated that the dovecot cache files were bad, so I erased /home/*/mail/.imap/ and it seemed to work subsequently. There are a

http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/dovecot/ dovecot-0.99.10.5 binary packages for FC1 and FC2 are available here. I need feedback from Fedora users with THESE ACTUAL BINARIES before pushing them to official updates. Note: This does not solve the SSL related crash issue. That requires a patch to OpenSSL or kernel. I am still trying to convince the maintainers to patch it. Warren Togami

Is anyone using squirrelmail with dovecot? After a few minor tweaks squirrelmail seems to work great, but I can't seem to get rid of the "./" folder. SquirrelMail implements some workaround hacks for specific IMAP server quirks. The default setting is: $imap_server_type = 'uw'; What settings do you folks use? Thanks, Warren Togami warren at togami.com

PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 32116 dovecot 19 0 1464 1464 1212 R 99.9 0.1 60:58 0 imap-login service dovecot stop ps -ef |grep imap-login |grep -v grep dovecot 32116 1 98 01:27 ? 01:01:33 imap-login /etc/dovecot.conf: auth_userdb = passwd uth_passdb = pam I think this was triggered while I attempted to login to IMAP with the

I am currently using Squirrelmail and Dovecot with this setting: default_mail_env = mbox:%h/mail/:INBOX=%h/mail/INBOX It works well, however folder subscriptions in Squirrelmail annoyingly end up with "./" prefixes because Squirrelmail refuses to work without overriding the folder namespace. All of my other IMAP clients work fine without setting that option. Squirrelmail's

* Attached is a mbox file that triggers Bug #1 and #2. * Go here if you want to test dovecot for RH9: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=160 * If somebody has a different IMAP server than dovecot, could you please test how Evolution reacts to reading this message? Bug #1 dovecot and #2 evolution-1.2.3 ===================================== I am using dovecot-0.99.9-test3 on RH9, reading

So there's your answer, Rick. How persistent are you? :-) Michael ----- Forwarded message from Warren Togami <warren at togami.com> ----- >So, Warren, how'd you do it? :) 3 months of harassing them and several NDA and licensing agreements I had to sign. Good luck... Warren ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is

Offer Expires April 30, 2003 X-Rcpt-To: <warren at togami.com> Get a 0% Intro APR* on Purchases and Balance Transfers You?ve been selected for a special No-Annual-Fee Discover? Card with all of these privileges: ? 0% Intro APR on Purchases and Balance Transfers* ? No Annual Fee ? Up to 2% Cashback Bonus? award* ? Up to $50,000 Credit Limit Start Saving Today ? APPLY NOW! It's fast,

ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: COPY 99:99 "INBOX.SPAM" Reason Given: [TRYCREATE] Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX.SPAM Running latest stable version of squirrelmail, dovecot, qmail and vpopmail with Maildir storage in virtual users. One of my users reports seeing this yesterday, then it went away for a few hours, then early in the next day it happened again on the same

Anyone with SSL problems, please try 0.99.10-test4 or included patch. If it fixes it, I'll make it faster by caching the generated keys. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ssl.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 937 bytes Desc: not available URL:

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :) - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12). So, what's left is to make PAM work well..

FYI, forwarded from the Fedora development list: ------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: Saturday, January 15, 2005 7:16 PM -1000 From: Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> To: John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list at redhat.com> Subject: Proposed dovecot update changes John,

One more bugfix since rc2: - Maildir: synchronization might have sometimes set wrong flags to messages, or crash completely Quite rare because we were lucky before :) And list of all the changes one more time: v0.99.10.5 2003-12-27 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> + MySQL authentication, patch by Matthew Reimer + --with-moduledir configure option - mbox: APPEND reversed given

greetings, have been google foo for week or so. used to be super easy to upgrade spamassassin on CentOS dist. just grab the tarball and put in right spot and rpmbuild -tb spamassassin-3.somethingsomething.tar.gz then rpm or yum install and done would take just a few minutes. Yet... in regards to EL4 / CentOS 4 and spamassassin, it appears the end of the road for .spec in SA tarball

Hey, > So there's your answer, Rick. How persistent are you? :-) Now I understand this may not be a quickie project. I will report back on progress from time to time. Rick --- centos-request at caosity.org wrote: > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:13:56 -0400 > From: Michael Jennings <mej at caosity.org> > To: centos at caosity.org > Subject: Re:

Hi Warren, you can try to configure with the following export CFLAGS="-m64" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64" LLVM: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit --enable-targets=host-only make LLVM-GCC: ../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/ --enable-languages=c,c++

Hi Warren, You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this: > Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested. > Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2. But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should use the binaries unless absolutely necessary. -bw On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Hi all,