similar to: what is the current state

hi, we've got (and getting more) serious problem with load. I'm just calculate that ther is about 300 mailbox with 20Gb mails. and the whole system is _very_ slow and just getting slower and slower. it's a fast lan every client has 100Mb connection to the server with gigabit crad and gigabit switches. when I push the delete button in a mail I usualy have to wait 10,20 or 30

Hi, May be it's not clear to everyone.. so this's just a quick notice to everyone. Don't use CentOS 7 as a developer workstation since currently there is not included any developer IDE. As eclipse was pulled out from the main distro and put into Red Hat Developer Toolset (which is imho a good idea not to use a 7 years old IDE). But Red Hat Developer Toolset is still not supported on

hi, I try to collect out most serious problem with dovecot. so I write a series of mails:-) the first on is the load. has anybody else use dovecot in a real enviromnt with at least hundreds of users and at least 50 concurrent user at the same time? it seems to me no one else just me. the weekend I move the whole mail system to a quad P4 with 1Gb ram and this server do nothing just imap.

hi, is dovecot are support all required feature for kolab imap server? the requirements can be found here: http://www.kolab.org/doc/kolabformat-2.0rc3-html/index.html ie. can i replace cyrus-imap with dovecot in a kolab server? thanks in advance. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, I still has a few other problem with dovecot and mozilla. - when I open mozilla mail I can only see the toplevel folders in the left handside folder list and when I close the imap folder and open it again (click on the arrow left to the imap server in the folder list) mozilla show me all folders and subfolders correctly (but not at the startup). it can be mozilla's bug, but

hi, the current cvs don't allow to login with mozilla just such messages: imap-login: Jun 25 01:29:30 Info: Aborted login [192.168.0.50] imap-login: Jun 25 01:29:39 Info: Aborted login [192.168.0.50] even the today afternoon messages was correct (or at least able to login to the imap). -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, we use openvpn as for our vpn endpoints and we''ve got about 70-80 vpn connections which means we have tun0 - tun80 interface. i''d like to define one zone for all of our vpn connections how can I do that? actualy our local zone is 192.168.0.0/17 (not 16) and all of the vpn''s are in 192.168.128.0/17. our should i define somehow the local zone as 192.168.0.0/16? but in

hi, it seem to me that dovecot support only v2 ldap protocol but openldap2.1 support only v3 (or you can enable v2 in the conf file, but it seems they wouldn't like to support it in the future). will dovecot support v3 ldap protocal? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, i create rule such action.AllowPostGrey: ----------------------------------------------- ###################################################################################### #TARGET SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) LIMIT GROUP ACCEPT $A_IP $PORTAL_IP tcp 10023 ACCEPT

hi, after a long time it seems the current packages which needed for kvm on centos-5 host seems to working (ie. worth to change). my repo: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/ contains the current set of rpms what we use (about a week): ----------------------------- libvirt-0.6.0-1 python-virtinst-0.400.1-1 virt-manager-0.6.1-1 virt-top-1.0.1-7.el5 virt-viewer-0.0.3-3

may here someone can answer me... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0200 From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org> References: <4860E6EB.5000906 at centos.org> Karanbir Singh wrote: > > We are

We have experianced a strang behavior with QuarkXPress files. These files can be opened/modified/saved by user a, user b can open/modify the file but saving is not possible. With all other applications open/modify/save files is possible. We use: SuSE8.1, Samba 2.2.5, reiserfs. Directories/files are set 2770 Thank you for your help Markus

hi, while all files is owned by nsd user and nsd run as nsd the nsd.db is still owned by root user (because the compiler run as root and create this file as root, ok i know just it'd be better if this file is owned by nsd too). another strange thing is that on the slave nsd i've got such messages: ----------------------------------------- zonec: reading zone "lfarkas.org".

hi, it seems our latest liebertgxt2 patch still missing from the just released 2.6.0. i'm attached the patch to the 2.6.0. this patch: - add the possibility to properly shutdown the ups, - can be used through usb-serial adapter cable too. could you apply it to the source. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -------------- next part

hi, in the masq file''s documentation, there is a sentence: "If you have a static IP on that interface, listing it here makes processing of output packets a little less expensive for the firewall." this realy means that SNAT to the primary address is less expensive than a MASQ rules in the netfilter? is this documented anywhere in iptables/netfilter? thanks. -- Levente

hi, it''d be very useful to add some kind of "log everything" option to shorewall. currently the logging is useful if you know what you would like to log. but if you don''t know than it''s a problem... another problem that currently it''s not possible to log the nat table. at least i can''t find any way (can''t add logging into masq and

hi, I'm just download the latest cvs and try to use imaps. in mozilla I've got the following message window: ----------------------------- mail.int.bppiac.hu received a message with incorrect Message Authentication Code. If the error occurs frequently, contact the website administrator. ----------------------------- and there is only one OK button:-) and this happens always. what can be

On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external > mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like > 4% still are not completely updated) what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while

hi, we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create it in a redundant way ie: - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still usable and consistent. - any server in this farm can see the same storage/filesystem. it's someting a big network raid5-6... storage where

hi, what is the current release versions for centos? it seems to a trivial question although: - centos/3 -> 3.4 why not to 3.5? - centos/4 -> 4.0 why not to 4.1? on the other hand # rpm -q centos-release centos-release-4-1.2 why not centos-release-4.1-2? in the current case we can't write in yum's repo file we can't write: .../centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ since $releasever is