similar to: 0.99.9.1 - "Panic: unreached" on large Maildir

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "0.99.9.1 - "Panic: unreached" on large Maildir"

2009 Sep 07
1
high imap load on large folders
Hello, i sync with imapsync from an archiopteryx-server to an dovecot-server, for testing until now. The dovecot is inside an VM. storage for mail is on an nfs-share, indexes are local. What i now see, is, on large folder( 58000 messages and more) the load on the imap-process is very high, and slowdown the transferprocess. Is there something, I can do. Whats cause the high load ind the
2002 Aug 07
1
Help/Note: Bug in samba-2.2.5/msdfs
Hi out there, we have detected a bug in Samba-2.2.5, full details are in the attached files, but apparently the follwing snippet is the most important part of it: [common] comment = Common Tree Rev 1.3 path = /var/samba/common/%a msdfs root = true read only = no public = no browseable = yes
2010 Aug 30
1
getdents() with 4KB buffer - seems slow (Maildir, large inbox)
Hi, I have a very large inbox (~146K mails) in Maildir format and dovecot seems to spend a lot of time rescanning the directory, especially when the server is loaded. I'm not sure whether this is triggered by Thunderbird or done regularly, but it takes longer when the server is loaded, so sometimes it seems that it is scanning continuously. Since it takes around 2000 getdents64() syscalls to
2000 Mar 08
0
why is samba so slow with many files in one directory? [LARGE MESSAGE]
Hubert Gr?nheidt wrote: > Maybe it'll help to be more precise: > We have currently 14 Mio files separated into 140 Directories, each > containing 100000 files. The naming-scheme is simple: <id>.<extension>; so > directory 00000001 contains files 0.<someext> to 99999.<someext>, directory > 00000002 contains files 100000.<someext> to
2004 Nov 26
0
Dovecot 1.0-test52 and LDAP authentication
Hi all! I have upgraded Dovecot 0.99.11 installation that's worked with LDAP to Dovecot 1.0-test52 and I can't get LDAP to work. I noticed the /etc/dovecot.conf is slightly different, so I have adjusted changes. If I use the standard auth (passw & pam) everything works fine, however when I user ldap for auth Dovecot starts but then dies: dovecot: Nov 26 14:14:36 Error: Auth process
2008 Jan 05
1
imap cores
Experts, (Now that I am able to run imap...) Here's what I am seeing with imap, it seems to die in the latest nightly. (tss, I am still trying to get dbx to work properly, maybe it won't, but I got some more details here.) ... 2 select "INBOX" * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted.
2008 Jan 17
1
convert plugin fails - drops root privileges then tries to create file in /
Hi I just tried to run the convert plugin as described at http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Convert (except with mail_location = maildir:~/Mail) It fails with an error message: Eopen(/.temp.falcon.endbracket.net.18618.8d5e0a038da6cf06) failed: Permission denied Error: imap dump-capability process returned 89 It looks like Dovecot execs /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap, which drops root privileges
2006 Oct 04
0
EXT3 and large directories (fwd)
(please reply on-list, so everybody can comment/help) Matt, thanks for the details, but apart from mount-option tuning and dir_index (which you've already enabled), I dunno why ls(1) would take *hours* to stat ~1M files... out of curiosity: are you able to try a newer kernel? does it change anything? Christian. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- The dir_index was enabled during
2015 Apr 23
0
Samba 4 slow write
Hello Ervin, The in-memory cache lookup could be added back into samba-4.1.6 by applying the attached patch, if it could be compiled with Louis how-to steps, perhaps got the chance to make U14.04 be stayed on samba-4. Here is my test, the test-bench is uploading 5000 files and each one is 1MB. The attached patch could improve 15% at case B). Case A) Original samba-4.1.6 will go through
2015 Apr 22
0
Samba 4 slow write
Hello Ervin, ? > Do you mean that this is the "normal" way? These geteuid and > getegid system calls are so slow? > >> ?% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall ?>> ? ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------------- ?>> ? 15.68 15.894980 4 4398791 getegid >> 15.57 15.783699 4
2007 Feb 02
1
lstats on all files in Maildir when opening an e-mail.
Hi, I'm running RC19 on a Solaris 10 SPARC box. It seems that whenever I open an e-mail in any folder via IMAP, dovecot appears to scan every other folder in the Maildir. A truss reveals that it is lstat-ing every e-mail in every directory. I'm sorry I am sending only a fragment of the truss, it's really too long... but is this behaviour expected? Cheers, Tan Shao Yi
2006 Mar 31
2
Small local dir refuses to sync, others AOK.
Hi guys, I'm having a problem rsyncing between two directories on local disk. I wish to sync the local directory /local/CA/eTrustDirectory/dxserver/ldif to the other local directory /local/CA/archive. 'rsync -vvvr --progress /local/CA/eTrustDirectory/dxserver/ldif /local/CA/archive' pauses at: make_file(4,ldif/MELLDRBIB11-ldsau004wm1/ldbau004v1_20060330.0204.raw)
2005 Mar 26
1
test65 "deliver" LDA bug
Hello. I've tried to implement dovecot's deliver LDA to my home mailserver. I've run into troubles :) dovecot-deliver.conf: -- snip -- mail = maildir:%h/Maildir:INBOX=maildir:%h/Maildir mbox_read_locks = flock mbox_write_locks = flock -- snip -- when i run: deliver -d bfg < email.txt dovecot delivers message to ~/Maildir/maildir/new It acctually creates "maildir"
2008 Dec 12
2
imap quota makes the Alarm clock expire
Hello list, I have a strange problem with dovecot and quota. The error message is not obvious... After a couple of seconds when I try to start dovceot, I get this: root at taleira:~# /etc/init.d/dovecot start Alarm clock If I uncomment the "imap_quota and quota" in dovecot.conf everything seem to work fine: protocol imap { listen = *:143 ssl_listen = *:993 # problem pa
2015 Apr 23
2
Samba 4 slow write
Hi Jones, many thanks again four your help and your time. Thanks for the patch too - I'll check it up. On my Ubuntu, there is a Samba 4.1.6. I'll install the samba source package, and will try to apply the patch, then - I hope - the package will be compiled as well. I'll notify to you about the result. (First, I need to upgrade that server.) Thanks again, Ervin On Thu, Apr
2003 Nov 02
2
dies on start-up: Auth process
I was digging through some of the archives and ran into someone who was having the same problem, but for completely different reasons....i think. dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:51 Info: Dovecot starting up dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: Auth process died too early - shutting down dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27673 (login) killed with signal 11 dovecot: Nov 02 07:58:52 Error: child 27672 (login)
2007 Dec 13
0
zpool version 3 & Uberblock version 9 , zpool upgrade only half succeeded?
We are currently experiencing a very huge perfomance drop on our zfs storage server. We have 2 pools, pool 1 stor is a raidz out of 7 iscsi nodes, home is a local mirror pool. Recently we had some issues with one of the storagenodes, because of that the pool was degraded. Since we did not succeed in bringing this storagenode back online (on zfs level) we upgraded our nashead from opensolaris b57
2004 Dec 07
1
smbd reads entire directory when creating files?
Apologies if this is a FAQ. We are saddled with some directories full of production image files that number in the hundreds of thousands to the millions. (Yes, I know this is bad.) They reside on a couple of Win 2003 boxes that are flaky and unreliable. I was hoping to copy them over to a Linux box running samba but it is taking forever. A strace on the smbd process receiving the files
2001 Nov 03
1
Samba swamps the server's CPU
Hi. I'm running Samba 2.2.2 and Linux 2.4.7 on a dual PPro-200/256KB server. The relevant NIC is an Intel EtherExpress PRO/100+. The problem I'm having is that certain programs will swamp the server; the load will spike immediately to 50% (i.e., 100% on one CPU) and performance will, naturally, bite. Having another active connection to the server at the same time causes _monster_
2002 May 24
1
Poor Performance
I have a big problem. I've looked at a bunch of documentation, both for Windows 2000/NT4, and Samba, and I have yet to find a solution. Anyway, here's the problem. We have a Unix File Server with ~2.6tb of online storage, performance is great over NFS to other Unix machines. However, using Samba, I get terrible performance. Samba ends up eating almost an entire processor by itself