similar to: the most serius problems [part 2]

hi, I try to collect out most serious problem with dovecot. so I write a series of mails:-) the first on is the load. has anybody else use dovecot in a real enviromnt with at least hundreds of users and at least 50 concurrent user at the same time? it seems to me no one else just me. the weekend I move the whole mail system to a quad P4 with 1Gb ram and this server do nothing just imap.

hi, we use openvpn as for our vpn endpoints and we''ve got about 70-80 vpn connections which means we have tun0 - tun80 interface. i''d like to define one zone for all of our vpn connections how can I do that? actualy our local zone is 192.168.0.0/17 (not 16) and all of the vpn''s are in 192.168.128.0/17. our should i define somehow the local zone as 192.168.0.0/16? but in

hi, so the third problem is ssl. the imaps is still not working (and I assume the same apply to pop3s too). I already send the log file which was generated when verbose ssl is set. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, I'm just download the latest cvs and try to use imaps. in mozilla I've got the following message window: ----------------------------- mail.int.bppiac.hu received a message with incorrect Message Authentication Code. If the error occurs frequently, contact the website administrator. ----------------------------- and there is only one OK button:-) and this happens always. what can be

hi, we've got (and getting more) serious problem with load. I'm just calculate that ther is about 300 mailbox with 20Gb mails. and the whole system is _very_ slow and just getting slower and slower. it's a fast lan every client has 100Mb connection to the server with gigabit crad and gigabit switches. when I push the delete button in a mail I usualy have to wait 10,20 or 30

hi, it'd be useul if the centosplus and contrib directory can contain a small readme file or some kind of documentaion about the rpm inside. currently there is not any kind of such docs (ok johnny send a description about the kernel rpms, but if someone missed that email). eg the postfix rpm has the same description and changelog inside the rpm as the original ones. if someone just look into

hi, i create rule such action.AllowPostGrey: ----------------------------------------------- ###################################################################################### #TARGET SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE RATE USER/ # PORT PORT(S) LIMIT GROUP ACCEPT $A_IP $PORTAL_IP tcp 10023 ACCEPT

hi, it seem to me that dovecot support only v2 ldap protocol but openldap2.1 support only v3 (or you can enable v2 in the conf file, but it seems they wouldn't like to support it in the future). will dovecot support v3 ldap protocal? thanks. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, ok it's turn out that not just mozilla not able to put the sent mails into the Sent folder but our webmail frontend (SquirrelMail) can't do it. so those who are using the webmail no longer able to use the mail system:-((( -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

We have experianced a strang behavior with QuarkXPress files. These files can be opened/modified/saved by user a, user b can open/modify the file but saving is not possible. With all other applications open/modify/save files is possible. We use: SuSE8.1, Samba 2.2.5, reiserfs. Directories/files are set 2770 Thank you for your help Markus

may here someone can answer me... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.2 i386 and x86_64 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:31:20 +0200 From: Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org> References: <4860E6EB.5000906 at centos.org> Karanbir Singh wrote: > > We are

hi, it seems our latest liebertgxt2 patch still missing from the just released 2.6.0. i'm attached the patch to the 2.6.0. this patch: - add the possibility to properly shutdown the ups, - can be used through usb-serial adapter cable too. could you apply it to the source. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" -------------- next part

Is anyone using squirrelmail with dovecot? After a few minor tweaks squirrelmail seems to work great, but I can't seem to get rid of the "./" folder. SquirrelMail implements some workaround hacks for specific IMAP server quirks. The default setting is: $imap_server_type = 'uw'; What settings do you folks use? Thanks, Warren Togami warren at togami.com

hi, while all files is owned by nsd user and nsd run as nsd the nsd.db is still owned by root user (because the compiler run as root and create this file as root, ok i know just it'd be better if this file is owned by nsd too). another strange thing is that on the slave nsd i've got such messages: ----------------------------------------- zonec: reading zone "lfarkas.org".

hi, it''d be very useful to add some kind of "log everything" option to shorewall. currently the logging is useful if you know what you would like to log. but if you don''t know than it''s a problem... another problem that currently it''s not possible to log the nat table. at least i can''t find any way (can''t add logging into masq and

This article describes how to implement "Port Knocking" in Shorewall. http://shorewall.net/PortKnocking.html -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

hi, is dovecot are support all required feature for kolab imap server? the requirements can be found here: http://www.kolab.org/doc/kolabformat-2.0rc3-html/index.html ie. can i replace cyrus-imap with dovecot in a kolab server? thanks in advance. yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

hi, after i try to use dovecot with ldap i configure dovecot as: ------------------------ first_valid_uid = 499 last_valid_uid = 499 first_valid_gid = 499 last_valid_gid = 499 default_mail_env = maildir:/home/mail/%d/%n auth_userdb = static uid=499 gid=499 home=/home/users/%d/%n auth_passdb = ldap /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf ------------------------ but after this i've got the error in imap.log:

hi, in the masq file''s documentation, there is a sentence: "If you have a static IP on that interface, listing it here makes processing of output packets a little less expensive for the firewall." this realy means that SNAT to the primary address is less expensive than a MASQ rules in the netfilter? is this documented anywhere in iptables/netfilter? thanks. -- Levente

On 08/07/2015 01:04 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > 6.7 is there most places ... since we have more than 500 external > mirrors (right now 593) not all of them are updated. (looks like > 4% still are not completely updated) what about the src.rpms? it seems http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/ and http://vault.centos.org/6.7/cr/Source/ is empty and while